Patient-Centered Innovation: Involving Patients in Open Social Innovation.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001987
Olivia S Jung, Michael Anne Kyle, Paula McCree, Hiyam M Nadel
{"title":"Patient-Centered Innovation: Involving Patients in Open Social Innovation.","authors":"Olivia S Jung, Michael Anne Kyle, Paula McCree, Hiyam M Nadel","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000001987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Involving patients in the health-care delivery innovation has many benefits. Open social innovation (OSI) presents a fitting lens to examine and advance patient engagement in innovation. OSI offers a participatory approach to innovation, in which diverse groups of participants collaboratively generate ideas and scale solutions on complex social challenges.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study: (1) describes a pilot application of OSI, in which individuals serving on a hospital's patients and family advisory councils (PFACs) were invited to participate in an innovation contest; and (2) explores the extent to which patients' beliefs about their role in innovation relate to their participation in the contest.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>We conducted an innovation contest that invited PFAC members to share ideas that would improve patient experiences and then vote on and select the ideas that they wanted to see move forward. We measured patients' beliefs about their role in innovation in a survey before the contest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty individuals submitted 27 ideas. Patients who expressed preference for more involvement in innovation were more likely to participate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using OSI may help expand patient engagement in innovation, particularly among those who want to be more involved but do not feel authorized to voice ideas in traditional advisory committees.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>OSI spurred collaboration among patients, clinicians, quality improvement staff, hospital administrators, and other stakeholders in idea generation, elaboration, and implementation. More experimentation and research are needed to understand how OSI can be leveraged to capture patients' voice and incorporate them in care delivery innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":" ","pages":"314-318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990018/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001987","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Involving patients in the health-care delivery innovation has many benefits. Open social innovation (OSI) presents a fitting lens to examine and advance patient engagement in innovation. OSI offers a participatory approach to innovation, in which diverse groups of participants collaboratively generate ideas and scale solutions on complex social challenges.

Purpose: This study: (1) describes a pilot application of OSI, in which individuals serving on a hospital's patients and family advisory councils (PFACs) were invited to participate in an innovation contest; and (2) explores the extent to which patients' beliefs about their role in innovation relate to their participation in the contest.

Methodology/approach: We conducted an innovation contest that invited PFAC members to share ideas that would improve patient experiences and then vote on and select the ideas that they wanted to see move forward. We measured patients' beliefs about their role in innovation in a survey before the contest.

Results: Twenty individuals submitted 27 ideas. Patients who expressed preference for more involvement in innovation were more likely to participate.

Conclusions: Using OSI may help expand patient engagement in innovation, particularly among those who want to be more involved but do not feel authorized to voice ideas in traditional advisory committees.

Practical implications: OSI spurred collaboration among patients, clinicians, quality improvement staff, hospital administrators, and other stakeholders in idea generation, elaboration, and implementation. More experimentation and research are needed to understand how OSI can be leveraged to capture patients' voice and incorporate them in care delivery innovation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以患者为中心的创新:让患者参与开放式社会创新。
背景:让患者参与医疗服务创新有很多好处。开放式社会创新(OSI)为研究和推动患者参与创新提供了一个合适的视角。目的:本研究(1)描述了开放式社会创新的试点应用,在该应用中,一家医院的患者和家属咨询委员会(PFACs)成员受邀参加创新竞赛;(2)探讨了患者对其在创新中的作用的看法在多大程度上与他们参加竞赛有关:我们举办了一次创新竞赛,邀请 PFAC 成员分享可改善患者体验的想法,然后投票选出他们希望推进的想法。比赛前,我们通过调查了解了患者对自己在创新中的作用的看法:结果:共有 20 人提交了 27 个想法。表示希望更多地参与创新的患者更有可能参赛:结论:使用开放社会倡议可能有助于扩大患者在创新中的参与度,尤其是那些希望更多地参与创新,但又觉得自己无权在传统的咨询委员会中表达想法的患者:开放社会倡议促进了患者、临床医生、质量改进人员、医院管理者和其他利益相关者在想法的产生、阐述和实施方面的合作。需要进行更多的试验和研究,以了解如何利用开放社会倡议来捕捉患者的声音,并将其纳入医疗服务创新中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Nurse Practitioner Full Practice Authority on Chronic Condition-Related Readmissions and Emergency Department Visits in the United States. Risk for Acute Care Utilization in Housing-Insecure Adults: A National Study of a Hot Spotter Program in the US Veterans Health Administration. Persistent Frequent Emergency Department Use Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study of One Million Users. Psychiatric Medication Prescribing by Nurse Practitioners and Physician Associates for Medicare Beneficiaries. Predictive Accuracy of Natural Language Processing Extracted 3-Step Theory of Suicide Factor Scores Derived From Veterans' Clinical Progress Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1