Using Acuity to Predict Oncology Infusion Center Daily Nurse Staffing and Outcomes.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Clinical journal of oncology nursing Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1188/24.CJON.181-187
Pamela F Tobias, Zachary Oliver, Yue Huang, Christopher Bayne, Lisa Fidyk
{"title":"Using Acuity to Predict Oncology Infusion Center Daily Nurse Staffing and Outcomes.","authors":"Pamela F Tobias, Zachary Oliver, Yue Huang, Christopher Bayne, Lisa Fidyk","doi":"10.1188/24.CJON.181-187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outpatient oncology infusion centers (OICs) use acuity to quantify the complexity and intensity of care to improve staffing levels and equitable patient assignments. OIC interviews revealed inconsistent measurement of acuity and a mixture of use cases. No publications measured objective operational benefits beyond surveyed nurse satisfaction or compared different models of acuity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study assessed three acuity models across multiple centers to determine whether acuity was superior to patient volumes or patient hours in predicting the number of nurses needed to care for scheduled patients in an OIC, as well as the effect on objective metrics of missed nurse lunch breaks and patient wait times. A secondary end point was used to identify a superior model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Classification machine learning models were built to assess the predictive value of three acuity models compared to patient hours and patient visits.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>None of the tested acuity models were found to have statistically significant improvement to the prediction of needed OIC nurse staffing, patient wait times, or missed nurse lunch breaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":10350,"journal":{"name":"Clinical journal of oncology nursing","volume":"28 2","pages":"181-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical journal of oncology nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1188/24.CJON.181-187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Outpatient oncology infusion centers (OICs) use acuity to quantify the complexity and intensity of care to improve staffing levels and equitable patient assignments. OIC interviews revealed inconsistent measurement of acuity and a mixture of use cases. No publications measured objective operational benefits beyond surveyed nurse satisfaction or compared different models of acuity.

Objectives: This study assessed three acuity models across multiple centers to determine whether acuity was superior to patient volumes or patient hours in predicting the number of nurses needed to care for scheduled patients in an OIC, as well as the effect on objective metrics of missed nurse lunch breaks and patient wait times. A secondary end point was used to identify a superior model.

Methods: Classification machine learning models were built to assess the predictive value of three acuity models compared to patient hours and patient visits.

Findings: None of the tested acuity models were found to have statistically significant improvement to the prediction of needed OIC nurse staffing, patient wait times, or missed nurse lunch breaks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用急性期预测肿瘤输液中心的日常护士配备和结果。
背景:门诊肿瘤输液中心(OICs)使用急性程度来量化护理的复杂性和强度,以提高人员配备水平和病人分配的公平性。对门诊肿瘤输液中心的访谈显示,对严重程度的测量并不一致,使用情况也多种多样。除调查护士满意度外,没有出版物对客观的运营效益进行衡量,也没有对不同的敏锐度模型进行比较:本研究评估了多个中心的三种严重程度模型,以确定严重程度是否优于病人数量或病人小时数,从而预测在 OIC 中护理排班病人所需的护士人数,以及对护士错过午休时间和病人等待时间等客观指标的影响。方法:建立分类机器学习模型来评估护士对病人的护理情况:方法:建立分类机器学习模型,以评估三种敏锐度模型与患者就诊时间和就诊人次相比的预测价值:结果:没有发现任何一个经过测试的严重程度模型在预测所需的 OIC 护士人员配备、病人等待时间或错过的护士午休时间方面有明显的统计学改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing (CJON) is an official publication of the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) and is directed to the practicing nurse specializing in the care of patients with an actual or potential diagnosis of cancer. CJON is a vehicle to promote the mission of ONS, which is to advance excellence in oncology nursing and quality cancer care. The CJON mission is twofold: to provide practical information necessary to care for patients and their families across the cancer continuum and to develop publication skills in oncology nurses.
期刊最新文献
Assessing and Treating Causes of Depressed Mood in Patients With Cancer. Bloodless Medicine in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Bolusing IV Administration Sets With Monoclonal Antibodies Reduces Cost and Chair Time: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Confusing Genomic Terms: The Importance of Being Precise. Consistent Nursing Presence Through Questionably Unprecedented Times.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1