Pregnant racialised migrants and the ubiquitous border: The hostile environment as a technology of stratified reproduction.

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1177/02610183231223951
Gwyneth Lonergan
{"title":"Pregnant racialised migrants and the ubiquitous border: The hostile environment as a technology of stratified reproduction.","authors":"Gwyneth Lonergan","doi":"10.1177/02610183231223951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores the impact of the 'hostile environment' on racialised migrant women's experiences of pregnancy and childbirth in England, arguing that the 'hostile environment' functions as a technology of 'stratified reproduction.' First coined by Shellee Colen, the concept of stratified reproduction describes the dynamic by which some individuals and groups may be supported in their reproductive activities, while others are disempowered and discouraged. This paper locates the stratified reproduction produced by the 'hostile environment' as intertwined with wider gendered and racialised discourses around British citizenship which have been 'designed to fail' racialised residents of the UK. Drawing on interviews with racialised migrant mothers in the north of England, this paper analyses how the proliferation and intensification of immigration controls interacts with gender, race, class, and other social regimes to differentially allocate the resources necessary for a safe and healthy pregnancy and childbirth, and how this is experienced materially by pregnant migrants.</p>","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"44 2","pages":"222-241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10948320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183231223951","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the impact of the 'hostile environment' on racialised migrant women's experiences of pregnancy and childbirth in England, arguing that the 'hostile environment' functions as a technology of 'stratified reproduction.' First coined by Shellee Colen, the concept of stratified reproduction describes the dynamic by which some individuals and groups may be supported in their reproductive activities, while others are disempowered and discouraged. This paper locates the stratified reproduction produced by the 'hostile environment' as intertwined with wider gendered and racialised discourses around British citizenship which have been 'designed to fail' racialised residents of the UK. Drawing on interviews with racialised migrant mothers in the north of England, this paper analyses how the proliferation and intensification of immigration controls interacts with gender, race, class, and other social regimes to differentially allocate the resources necessary for a safe and healthy pregnancy and childbirth, and how this is experienced materially by pregnant migrants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
怀孕的种族移民和无处不在的边境:作为分层生殖技术的敌对环境。
本文探讨了 "敌对环境 "对英国种族化移民妇女怀孕和分娩经历的影响,认为 "敌对环境 "是一种 "分层生殖 "技术。分层再生产 "这一概念最早由谢莉-科伦(Shellee Colen)提出,它描述了这样一种动态:一些个人和群体在生育活动中可能会得到支持,而另一些个人和群体则被剥夺了权利并受到阻碍。本文将 "敌对环境 "产生的分层再生产与围绕英国公民身份的更广泛的性别和种族话语交织在一起,这些话语 "旨在使 "英国的种族居民 "失败"。本文通过对英格兰北部种族化移民母亲的访谈,分析了移民控制的扩散和加强如何与性别、种族、阶级和其他社会制度相互作用,从而对安全、健康的怀孕和分娩所需的资源进行不同的分配,以及怀孕移民如何从物质上体验到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Critical Social Policy provides a forum for advocacy, analysis and debate on social policy issues. We publish critical perspectives which: ·acknowledge and reflect upon differences in political, economic, social and cultural power and upon the diversity of cultures and movements shaping social policy; ·re-think conventional approaches to securing rights, meeting needs and challenging inequalities and injustices; ·include perspectives, analyses and concerns of people and groups whose voices are unheard or underrepresented in policy-making; ·reflect lived experiences of users of existing benefits and services;
期刊最新文献
Distanciation as a technology of control in the UK hostile environment. Pregnant racialised migrants and the ubiquitous border: The hostile environment as a technology of stratified reproduction. Bordering social reproduction: The welfare/immigration regimes of Quebec and Ontario in Canada Diminishing returns of growth? Economic performance, needs satisfaction and ecological impacts of OECD welfare states A cure-all for energy poverty? Thinking critically about energy advice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1