3D bioprinting of thermosensitive inks based on gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and fibrinogen: reproducibility and role of printing parameters

Q1 Computer Science Bioprinting Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00338
Federica Iberite , Maider Badiola-Mateos , Sara Loggini , Claudia Paci , Jacopo Ruspi , Daniele Iachetta , Andrea Mannini , Emanuele Gruppioni , Leonardo Ricotti
{"title":"3D bioprinting of thermosensitive inks based on gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and fibrinogen: reproducibility and role of printing parameters","authors":"Federica Iberite ,&nbsp;Maider Badiola-Mateos ,&nbsp;Sara Loggini ,&nbsp;Claudia Paci ,&nbsp;Jacopo Ruspi ,&nbsp;Daniele Iachetta ,&nbsp;Andrea Mannini ,&nbsp;Emanuele Gruppioni ,&nbsp;Leonardo Ricotti","doi":"10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Thermosensitive inks are considered an attractive option for the 3D bioprinting of different tissue types, yet comprehensive information on their reliability, preparation, and properties remains lacking.</p><p>This paper addresses this gap by presenting a twofold aim: firstly, characterizing the preparation, rheology, and printing aspects of two inks that have demonstrated success in skeletal muscle tissue engineering both <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em>. The first ink is composed of fibrinogen, gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and glycerol, while the second is a sacrificial ink made of gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and glycerol. Secondly, from this analysis, we demonstrate how thermosensitive and multicomponent inks can exhibit high variability and unpredictability. Thus, we emphasize the importance of thorough ink characterization to ensure the reproducibility and reliability of scientific outcomes.</p><p>We quantified the inherent variability in ink manufacturing and we proposed specific quality assessment criteria. We found storing the fibroink at 4 °C for one day did not alter fibroink properties, while significant changes were produced if the storage time was seven days. Cell viability within the fibroink was evaluated at different temperatures, identifying 9 °C as the optimal trade-off between cell viability and printability. Rheological analyses confirmed the shear-thinning behavior of both inks and identified their respective sol-gel transition temperatures. A systematic assessment of printing fidelity was performed, by varying pressure, speed, and needle offset. The methodology proposed in this study may be useful for the management of other thermosensitive bioinks, thus properly considering their inherent variability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37770,"journal":{"name":"Bioprinting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405886624000101/pdfft?md5=650af59cce4d7b452dfc5316032c8536&pid=1-s2.0-S2405886624000101-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioprinting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405886624000101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thermosensitive inks are considered an attractive option for the 3D bioprinting of different tissue types, yet comprehensive information on their reliability, preparation, and properties remains lacking.

This paper addresses this gap by presenting a twofold aim: firstly, characterizing the preparation, rheology, and printing aspects of two inks that have demonstrated success in skeletal muscle tissue engineering both in vitro and in vivo. The first ink is composed of fibrinogen, gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and glycerol, while the second is a sacrificial ink made of gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and glycerol. Secondly, from this analysis, we demonstrate how thermosensitive and multicomponent inks can exhibit high variability and unpredictability. Thus, we emphasize the importance of thorough ink characterization to ensure the reproducibility and reliability of scientific outcomes.

We quantified the inherent variability in ink manufacturing and we proposed specific quality assessment criteria. We found storing the fibroink at 4 °C for one day did not alter fibroink properties, while significant changes were produced if the storage time was seven days. Cell viability within the fibroink was evaluated at different temperatures, identifying 9 °C as the optimal trade-off between cell viability and printability. Rheological analyses confirmed the shear-thinning behavior of both inks and identified their respective sol-gel transition temperatures. A systematic assessment of printing fidelity was performed, by varying pressure, speed, and needle offset. The methodology proposed in this study may be useful for the management of other thermosensitive bioinks, thus properly considering their inherent variability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于明胶、透明质酸和纤维蛋白原的热敏油墨的三维生物打印:打印参数的可重复性和作用
热敏性油墨被认为是三维生物打印不同组织类型的一个有吸引力的选择,但有关其可靠性、制备和特性的全面信息仍然缺乏。本文通过提出两个方面的目标来填补这一空白:首先,描述两种油墨的制备、流变学和打印方面的特性,这两种油墨在体外和体内的骨骼肌组织工程中都取得了成功。第一种油墨由纤维蛋白原、明胶、透明质酸和甘油组成,第二种是由明胶、透明质酸和甘油组成的牺牲油墨。其次,通过分析,我们展示了热敏性和多组分油墨如何表现出高变异性和不可预测性。因此,我们强调了对油墨进行彻底表征的重要性,以确保科学成果的可重复性和可靠性。我们对油墨制造过程中固有的可变性进行了量化,并提出了具体的质量评估标准。我们发现,在 4 °C 下储存纤维链一天不会改变纤维链的特性,而储存七天则会产生显著变化。我们在不同温度下评估了纤维链接内的细胞存活率,发现 9 °C 是细胞存活率和可印刷性之间的最佳平衡点。流变分析证实了两种油墨的剪切稀化行为,并确定了它们各自的溶胶-凝胶转变温度。通过改变压力、速度和针的偏移量,对打印保真度进行了系统评估。本研究提出的方法可能有助于管理其他热敏性生物墨水,从而适当考虑其固有的可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bioprinting
Bioprinting Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Bioprinting is a broad-spectrum, multidisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of 3D fabrication technology involving biological tissues, organs and cells for medical and biotechnology applications. Topics covered include nanomaterials, biomaterials, scaffolds, 3D printing technology, imaging and CAD/CAM software and hardware, post-printing bioreactor maturation, cell and biological factor patterning, biofabrication, tissue engineering and other applications of 3D bioprinting technology. Bioprinting publishes research reports describing novel results with high clinical significance in all areas of 3D bioprinting research. Bioprinting issues contain a wide variety of review and analysis articles covering topics relevant to 3D bioprinting ranging from basic biological, material and technical advances to pre-clinical and clinical applications of 3D bioprinting.
期刊最新文献
3D and 4D printed materials for cardiac transplantation: Advances in biogenerative engineering Evolution of toxicity testing platforms from 2D to advanced 3D bioprinting for safety assessment of drugs Robust design optimization of Critical Quality Indicators (CQIs) of medical-graded polycaprolactone (PCL) in bioplotting Recent advances in the development of stereolithography-based additive manufacturing processes: A review of applications and challenges Optimizing biomaterial inks: A study on the printability of Carboxymethyl cellulose-Laponite nanocomposite hydrogels and dental pulp stem cells bioprinting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1