{"title":"3D bioprinting of thermosensitive inks based on gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and fibrinogen: reproducibility and role of printing parameters","authors":"Federica Iberite , Maider Badiola-Mateos , Sara Loggini , Claudia Paci , Jacopo Ruspi , Daniele Iachetta , Andrea Mannini , Emanuele Gruppioni , Leonardo Ricotti","doi":"10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Thermosensitive inks are considered an attractive option for the 3D bioprinting of different tissue types, yet comprehensive information on their reliability, preparation, and properties remains lacking.</p><p>This paper addresses this gap by presenting a twofold aim: firstly, characterizing the preparation, rheology, and printing aspects of two inks that have demonstrated success in skeletal muscle tissue engineering both <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em>. The first ink is composed of fibrinogen, gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and glycerol, while the second is a sacrificial ink made of gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and glycerol. Secondly, from this analysis, we demonstrate how thermosensitive and multicomponent inks can exhibit high variability and unpredictability. Thus, we emphasize the importance of thorough ink characterization to ensure the reproducibility and reliability of scientific outcomes.</p><p>We quantified the inherent variability in ink manufacturing and we proposed specific quality assessment criteria. We found storing the fibroink at 4 °C for one day did not alter fibroink properties, while significant changes were produced if the storage time was seven days. Cell viability within the fibroink was evaluated at different temperatures, identifying 9 °C as the optimal trade-off between cell viability and printability. Rheological analyses confirmed the shear-thinning behavior of both inks and identified their respective sol-gel transition temperatures. A systematic assessment of printing fidelity was performed, by varying pressure, speed, and needle offset. The methodology proposed in this study may be useful for the management of other thermosensitive bioinks, thus properly considering their inherent variability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37770,"journal":{"name":"Bioprinting","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article e00338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405886624000101/pdfft?md5=650af59cce4d7b452dfc5316032c8536&pid=1-s2.0-S2405886624000101-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioprinting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405886624000101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Thermosensitive inks are considered an attractive option for the 3D bioprinting of different tissue types, yet comprehensive information on their reliability, preparation, and properties remains lacking.
This paper addresses this gap by presenting a twofold aim: firstly, characterizing the preparation, rheology, and printing aspects of two inks that have demonstrated success in skeletal muscle tissue engineering both in vitro and in vivo. The first ink is composed of fibrinogen, gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and glycerol, while the second is a sacrificial ink made of gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and glycerol. Secondly, from this analysis, we demonstrate how thermosensitive and multicomponent inks can exhibit high variability and unpredictability. Thus, we emphasize the importance of thorough ink characterization to ensure the reproducibility and reliability of scientific outcomes.
We quantified the inherent variability in ink manufacturing and we proposed specific quality assessment criteria. We found storing the fibroink at 4 °C for one day did not alter fibroink properties, while significant changes were produced if the storage time was seven days. Cell viability within the fibroink was evaluated at different temperatures, identifying 9 °C as the optimal trade-off between cell viability and printability. Rheological analyses confirmed the shear-thinning behavior of both inks and identified their respective sol-gel transition temperatures. A systematic assessment of printing fidelity was performed, by varying pressure, speed, and needle offset. The methodology proposed in this study may be useful for the management of other thermosensitive bioinks, thus properly considering their inherent variability.
热敏性油墨被认为是三维生物打印不同组织类型的一个有吸引力的选择,但有关其可靠性、制备和特性的全面信息仍然缺乏。本文通过提出两个方面的目标来填补这一空白:首先,描述两种油墨的制备、流变学和打印方面的特性,这两种油墨在体外和体内的骨骼肌组织工程中都取得了成功。第一种油墨由纤维蛋白原、明胶、透明质酸和甘油组成,第二种是由明胶、透明质酸和甘油组成的牺牲油墨。其次,通过分析,我们展示了热敏性和多组分油墨如何表现出高变异性和不可预测性。因此,我们强调了对油墨进行彻底表征的重要性,以确保科学成果的可重复性和可靠性。我们对油墨制造过程中固有的可变性进行了量化,并提出了具体的质量评估标准。我们发现,在 4 °C 下储存纤维链一天不会改变纤维链的特性,而储存七天则会产生显著变化。我们在不同温度下评估了纤维链接内的细胞存活率,发现 9 °C 是细胞存活率和可印刷性之间的最佳平衡点。流变分析证实了两种油墨的剪切稀化行为,并确定了它们各自的溶胶-凝胶转变温度。通过改变压力、速度和针的偏移量,对打印保真度进行了系统评估。本研究提出的方法可能有助于管理其他热敏性生物墨水,从而适当考虑其固有的可变性。
期刊介绍:
Bioprinting is a broad-spectrum, multidisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of 3D fabrication technology involving biological tissues, organs and cells for medical and biotechnology applications. Topics covered include nanomaterials, biomaterials, scaffolds, 3D printing technology, imaging and CAD/CAM software and hardware, post-printing bioreactor maturation, cell and biological factor patterning, biofabrication, tissue engineering and other applications of 3D bioprinting technology. Bioprinting publishes research reports describing novel results with high clinical significance in all areas of 3D bioprinting research. Bioprinting issues contain a wide variety of review and analysis articles covering topics relevant to 3D bioprinting ranging from basic biological, material and technical advances to pre-clinical and clinical applications of 3D bioprinting.