Transcatheter arterial embolization outperforms surgery in reducing blood transfusions for postpartum vulvovaginal hematoma

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.016
Tsukasa Takahashi MD , Hasumi Tomita MD, PhD , Hirotaka Hamada MD, PhD , Mari Tadakawa MD, PhD , Noriyuki Iwama MD, PhD , Masatoshi Saito MD, PhD
{"title":"Transcatheter arterial embolization outperforms surgery in reducing blood transfusions for postpartum vulvovaginal hematoma","authors":"Tsukasa Takahashi MD ,&nbsp;Hasumi Tomita MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hirotaka Hamada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mari Tadakawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Noriyuki Iwama MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Masatoshi Saito MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>Postpartum vulvovaginal hematoma is a complication of </span>vaginal delivery<span> that may progress to life-threatening conditions. However, the management of hematomas, including conservative therapy, surgery, and arterial embolization, is yet to be standardized.</span></div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to: (1) evaluate hematoma features that can be treated conservatively, and (2) determine whether surgery or transcatheter arterial embolization is superior in reducing blood transfusion.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div><span>This cross-sectional study included postpartum women transferred to Tohoku University Hospital, Japan, between January 2016 and September 2023 for postpartum vulvovaginal hematomas. Notably, all patients except 1 underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The patients were classified into the following groups: (1) the conservative group who received neither surgery nor transcatheter arterial embolization and (2) the therapeutic intervention group who received surgery or transcatheter arterial embolization. The primary analysis included all patients. Variables for the choice of therapeutic intervention, including the </span>shock index<span><span><span>, hemoglobin concentration at arrival, hematoma size, and presence of extravasation, were assessed using a modified Poisson regression model. The secondary analysis included patients who received therapeutic intervention (ie, surgery or transcatheter arterial embolization). Variables for estimating the total amount of blood transfusion, including </span>shock index, hemoglobin concentration at arrival, hematoma size, type of intervention, and presence of extravasation, were analyzed using </span>multiple linear regression.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-seven cases were included in this study. Patients underwent conservative treatment (n=19), surgery (n=11), or transcatheter arterial embolization (n=27). In primary analysis, only the presence of extravasation was significantly associated with the choice of therapeutic intervention (adjusted risk ratio [95% confidence interval], 5.30 [1.53–18.37]). In the secondary analysis, the choice of surgery as a therapeutic option (unstandardized coefficient [95% confidence interval], 4.64 [1.15–8.13]; reference: transcatheter arterial embolization), lower hemoglobin concentration at arrival (−2.84 [−4.71 to −0.97]; 1 g/dL increment), and larger hematoma size (3.38 [1.23–5.53]; 100 cm<sup>3</sup> increments) were significantly associated with increased blood transfusion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>When a vulvovaginal hematoma does not exhibit extravasation, it can be treated conservatively regardless of size. When a therapeutic intervention is selected, transcatheter arterial embolization reduces the total amount of blood transfusion compared with surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"231 6","pages":"Pages 653.e1-653.e8"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937824004459","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Postpartum vulvovaginal hematoma is a complication of vaginal delivery that may progress to life-threatening conditions. However, the management of hematomas, including conservative therapy, surgery, and arterial embolization, is yet to be standardized.

Objective

This study aimed to: (1) evaluate hematoma features that can be treated conservatively, and (2) determine whether surgery or transcatheter arterial embolization is superior in reducing blood transfusion.

Study Design

This cross-sectional study included postpartum women transferred to Tohoku University Hospital, Japan, between January 2016 and September 2023 for postpartum vulvovaginal hematomas. Notably, all patients except 1 underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The patients were classified into the following groups: (1) the conservative group who received neither surgery nor transcatheter arterial embolization and (2) the therapeutic intervention group who received surgery or transcatheter arterial embolization. The primary analysis included all patients. Variables for the choice of therapeutic intervention, including the shock index, hemoglobin concentration at arrival, hematoma size, and presence of extravasation, were assessed using a modified Poisson regression model. The secondary analysis included patients who received therapeutic intervention (ie, surgery or transcatheter arterial embolization). Variables for estimating the total amount of blood transfusion, including shock index, hemoglobin concentration at arrival, hematoma size, type of intervention, and presence of extravasation, were analyzed using multiple linear regression.

Results

Fifty-seven cases were included in this study. Patients underwent conservative treatment (n=19), surgery (n=11), or transcatheter arterial embolization (n=27). In primary analysis, only the presence of extravasation was significantly associated with the choice of therapeutic intervention (adjusted risk ratio [95% confidence interval], 5.30 [1.53–18.37]). In the secondary analysis, the choice of surgery as a therapeutic option (unstandardized coefficient [95% confidence interval], 4.64 [1.15–8.13]; reference: transcatheter arterial embolization), lower hemoglobin concentration at arrival (−2.84 [−4.71 to −0.97]; 1 g/dL increment), and larger hematoma size (3.38 [1.23–5.53]; 100 cm3 increments) were significantly associated with increased blood transfusion.

Conclusion

When a vulvovaginal hematoma does not exhibit extravasation, it can be treated conservatively regardless of size. When a therapeutic intervention is selected, transcatheter arterial embolization reduces the total amount of blood transfusion compared with surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经导管动脉栓塞术在减少产后外阴血肿输血量方面优于手术治疗。
背景:产后外阴阴道血肿是阴道分娩的一种并发症,有可能发展成危及生命的情况。然而,包括保守治疗、手术和动脉栓塞在内的血肿处理方法尚未标准化:本研究旨在 i) 评估可采取保守疗法的血肿特征,ii) 确定手术和经导管动脉栓塞在减少输血方面哪个更优:这项横断面研究纳入了 2016 年 1 月至 2023 年 9 月间因产后外阴血肿转入日本东北大学医院的产后妇女。值得注意的是,除一名患者外,其他患者均接受了造影剂增强计算机断层扫描。患者被分为 i) 既不接受手术也不接受经导管心房栓塞治疗的保守治疗组和 ii) 接受手术或经导管心房栓塞治疗的治疗干预组。主要分析包括所有患者。使用改良泊松回归模型评估了选择治疗干预的变量,包括休克指数、到达时的血红蛋白浓度、血肿大小和是否存在外渗。二次分析包括接受治疗干预(即手术或经导管心房栓塞)的患者。使用多元线性回归分析了用于估算输血总量的变量,包括休克指数、到达时的血红蛋白浓度、血肿大小、干预类型和是否存在外渗:本研究共纳入 57 例患者。患者分别接受了保守治疗(19 例)、手术治疗(11 例)或经导管动脉栓塞治疗(27 例)。在主要分析中,只有外渗的存在与治疗干预的选择有显著相关性(调整风险比[95% 置信区间],5.30 [1.53, 18.37])。在二次分析中,手术治疗选择(非标准化系数[95%置信区间],4.64 [1.15,8.13],参考:经导管心房栓塞术)、到达时血红蛋白浓度较低(-2.84 [-4.71,-0.97],1 g/dL 增量)和血肿较大(3.38 [1.23,5.53],100 cm3 增量)与输血量增加显著相关:结论:当外阴血肿未发生外渗时,无论大小均可采取保守治疗。结论:当外阴血肿没有发生外渗时,无论大小都可以采取保守治疗,如果选择治疗干预,经导管动脉栓塞与手术相比,可以减少输血总量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2237
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare. Focus Areas: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders. Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases. Content Types: Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles. Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology. Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field. Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews. Peer Review Process: All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
期刊最新文献
Clinical application of nanopore-based DNA sequencing for rapid, point-of-care, 24-chromosome aneuploidy testing of products of conception following a pregnancy loss. Cardiac structural, functional and energetic assessments during and after pregnancy in women with gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia and healthy pregnancy. Assessing Aspirin Dosing for Pre-eclampsia Prevention: Clarifying Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of birth defects mediated by multifetal pregnancy: evidence from the China Birth Cohort Study. DORA: Comparing 75 mg vs 150 mg aspirin in pregnant women at risk of pre-eclampsia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1