The role of social and environmental sustainability on sportswear’s purchasing among European consumers

Michael Fuchs, Guillaume Bodet, Gregor Hovemann
{"title":"The role of social and environmental sustainability on sportswear’s purchasing among European consumers","authors":"Michael Fuchs, Guillaume Bodet, Gregor Hovemann","doi":"10.1108/ijsms-06-2023-0116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>While consumer preferences for sporting goods have been widely researched within sport management, literature is lacking on aspects of social and environmental sustainability. Accordingly, this study aims to investigate the role of social and environmental sustainability for purchase decisions of sportswear and compares them to the role of price and functionality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Based on a conjoint analysis among 1,012 Europeans, the authors conducted a two-step cluster analysis. First, the authors investigated the number of segments via Ward’s method. Second, the authors ran a k-means analysis based on part-worth utilities from the conjoint analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors identified four segments which differ in terms of preferred product attributes, willingness to pay, and sociodemographic, behavioral, and psychographic characteristics: undecided, sustainable, price-focused and function-oriented consumers. Based on this segmentation, the authors found that the importance of social and environmental sustainability is growing, but not among all consumers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The generalizability of the study is limited since it is not built on a sample representative for the included European countries, it focuses on a single product, and participants are potentially subject to a social desirability bias.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The consumer analysis comprises the uptake of attributes related to social and environmental sustainability. The authors thereby address a literature gap as previous research (thematizing sporting goods) in the sport management field has often neglected sustainability elements despite their rapidly growing importance within the sport sector.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":501000,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijsms-06-2023-0116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

While consumer preferences for sporting goods have been widely researched within sport management, literature is lacking on aspects of social and environmental sustainability. Accordingly, this study aims to investigate the role of social and environmental sustainability for purchase decisions of sportswear and compares them to the role of price and functionality.

Design/methodology/approach

Based on a conjoint analysis among 1,012 Europeans, the authors conducted a two-step cluster analysis. First, the authors investigated the number of segments via Ward’s method. Second, the authors ran a k-means analysis based on part-worth utilities from the conjoint analysis.

Findings

The authors identified four segments which differ in terms of preferred product attributes, willingness to pay, and sociodemographic, behavioral, and psychographic characteristics: undecided, sustainable, price-focused and function-oriented consumers. Based on this segmentation, the authors found that the importance of social and environmental sustainability is growing, but not among all consumers.

Research limitations/implications

The generalizability of the study is limited since it is not built on a sample representative for the included European countries, it focuses on a single product, and participants are potentially subject to a social desirability bias.

Originality/value

The consumer analysis comprises the uptake of attributes related to social and environmental sustainability. The authors thereby address a literature gap as previous research (thematizing sporting goods) in the sport management field has often neglected sustainability elements despite their rapidly growing importance within the sport sector.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会和环境可持续性对欧洲消费者购买运动服装的影响
目的虽然消费者对体育用品的偏好已在体育管理领域得到广泛研究,但缺乏有关社会和环境可持续性方面的文献。因此,本研究旨在调查社会和环境可持续性在体育用品购买决策中的作用,并将其与价格和功能的作用进行比较。设计/方法/途径作者在对 1012 名欧洲人进行联合分析的基础上,分两步进行了聚类分析。首先,作者通过 Ward 方法调查了细分市场的数量。研究结果作者确定了四个细分市场,它们在偏好的产品属性、支付意愿以及社会人口、行为和心理特征方面存在差异:未定消费者、可持续消费者、价格导向型消费者和功能导向型消费者。基于这种细分,作者发现社会和环境可持续发展的重要性正在增长,但并非在所有消费者中都是如此。研究局限性/影响研究的普遍性是有限的,因为它不是建立在对所包括的欧洲国家具有代表性的样本基础上,它侧重于单一产品,而且参与者可能会受到社会可取性偏差的影响。作者由此填补了文献空白,因为体育管理领域以往的研究(体育用品主题化)往往忽视了可持续发展要素,尽管这些要素在体育领域的重要性迅速增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pre-post examination of residents’ destination image toward mega event hosting country with strained bilateral relations Gender differences in the effects of nostalgia on conspicuous consumption and impulsive buying Digitalization in action sports: blessing or curse? Connecting event impact perceptions to sponsor-related behaviours among residents in the host city A machine learning approach to predict classification of fans’ attitudes toward sponsors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1