Qualitative Contributions to a Randomized Controlled Trial Addressing HIV/AIDS-Stigma in Medical Students.

IF 1.6 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Qualitative Report Pub Date : 2015-12-01 Epub Date: 2015-12-21
Melissa Marzán-Rodríguez, Nelson Varas-Díaz, Torsten Neilands
{"title":"Qualitative Contributions to a Randomized Controlled Trial Addressing HIV/AIDS-Stigma in Medical Students.","authors":"Melissa Marzán-Rodríguez, Nelson Varas-Díaz, Torsten Neilands","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Specialized training for healthcare professionals (HCP) in order to reduce HIV/AIDS related stigma must be part of a public health model for HIV/AIDS. Tested interventions to reduce HIV/AIDS related stigma among HCP have been mostly absent from these efforts. A qualitative approach was used to assess stigma reduction within a traditional randomized controlled design in order to better understand how our current stigma intervention worked and was understood by 2nd year medical students. After conducting a quantitative follow up survey one-year post intervention we conducted 20 in-depth qualitative interviews with a subsample of our intervention group participants as part of the overall evaluation process. Once the interviews were finished, we transcribed them and used NVivo (v.8) to organized the qualitative data. In the process of analyzing the qualitative data we identified core intervention areas participants described as useful for their training and development: (1) acquiring more HIV/AIDS-related knowledge, (2) increased skills for management of high stigma situations, and (3) the ability to identify socio-structural factors that foster HIV infection among clients. The gathered information is important in order to have a deep understanding of how attitudinal change happens as part of our intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51387,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Report","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Specialized training for healthcare professionals (HCP) in order to reduce HIV/AIDS related stigma must be part of a public health model for HIV/AIDS. Tested interventions to reduce HIV/AIDS related stigma among HCP have been mostly absent from these efforts. A qualitative approach was used to assess stigma reduction within a traditional randomized controlled design in order to better understand how our current stigma intervention worked and was understood by 2nd year medical students. After conducting a quantitative follow up survey one-year post intervention we conducted 20 in-depth qualitative interviews with a subsample of our intervention group participants as part of the overall evaluation process. Once the interviews were finished, we transcribed them and used NVivo (v.8) to organized the qualitative data. In the process of analyzing the qualitative data we identified core intervention areas participants described as useful for their training and development: (1) acquiring more HIV/AIDS-related knowledge, (2) increased skills for management of high stigma situations, and (3) the ability to identify socio-structural factors that foster HIV infection among clients. The gathered information is important in order to have a deep understanding of how attitudinal change happens as part of our intervention strategies.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对一项针对医学生的艾滋病毒/艾滋病污名化随机对照试验的定性贡献。
对医疗保健专业人员(HCP)进行专门培训,以减少与艾滋病毒/艾滋病相关的耻辱感,必须成为艾滋病毒/艾滋病公共卫生模式的一部分。在这些工作中,大部分都没有采用经过测试的干预措施来减少医护人员中与艾滋病相关的耻辱感。为了更好地了解我们目前的污名化干预措施是如何发挥作用的,以及二年级医学生是如何理解的,我们采用了一种定性方法来评估传统随机对照设计中的污名化减少情况。在对干预一年后的情况进行定量跟踪调查后,我们对干预组的部分参与者进行了 20 次深入的定性访谈,作为整体评估过程的一部分。访谈结束后,我们对访谈内容进行了转录,并使用 NVivo(v.8)对定性数据进行了整理。在分析定性数据的过程中,我们确定了参与者认为对其培训和发展有用的核心干预领域:(1) 获取更多与艾滋病相关的知识,(2) 提高处理高度污名化情况的技能,(3) 识别助长客户感染艾滋病的社会结构因素的能力。收集到的信息对于深入了解作为我们干预战略一部分的态度转变是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Qualitative Report
Qualitative Report SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
148
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
"We Live on an Island": Perspectives on Rural Family Caregivers for Adults with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias in the United States. Managing Student Suicidality on Campus: Perspectives from Diverse Student Affairs Staff. Access to Eye Care Before and After Vision Loss: A Qualitative Study Investigating Eye Care Among Persons Who Have Become Blind. Medication Exposure Patterns in Primary Care Patients Prescribed Pharmacogenetically Actionable Opioids. Medication Exposure Patterns in Primary Care Patients Prescribed Pharmacogenetically Actionable Opioids.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1