Effects of Yi Jin Bang versus conventional exercise therapy in people with subacromial pain syndrome: A randomized controlled trial

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jesf.2024.03.007
Jinde Liu, Stanley Sai-chuen Hui, Yijian Yang, Cindy Hui-ping Sit
{"title":"Effects of Yi Jin Bang versus conventional exercise therapy in people with subacromial pain syndrome: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Jinde Liu,&nbsp;Stanley Sai-chuen Hui,&nbsp;Yijian Yang,&nbsp;Cindy Hui-ping Sit","doi":"10.1016/j.jesf.2024.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/objective</h3><p>Previous studies have indicated that mind-body exercises can reduce pain and improve function for patients with musculoskeletal conditions. Yi Jin Bang is a novel home-based Chinese mind-body Qigong exercise for shoulder pain. However, few studies have evaluated its effects on subacromial pain syndrome. This study aimed to compare the effects of Yi Jin Bang with conventional exercises for subacromial pain syndrome.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Adults with subacromial pain syndrome (N = 105; mean [SD] age, 37 [16] years; 73 females [70%]; median [IQR] duration of symptoms, 12 [6–24] months) were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (n = 53) or the control group (n = 52). The experimental group performed home-based Yi Jin Bang exercises, whereas the control group performed home-based conventional exercises (stretching, strengthening, and motor control exercises). Both interventions were performed four times a week for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Secondary outcomes included current shoulder pain intensity, active shoulder range of motion, back scratch test, isometric shoulder strength, and health-related quality of life. Assessments were performed at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. The primary endpoint was week 16.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant between-group difference was observed in the SPADI score at week 16 (mean difference, Yi Jin Bang minus conventional exercise, 0.14, 95% confidence interval −2.96 to 3.24; <em>p</em> = 0.93).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There were no differences between Yi Jin Bang and conventional exercises in improving pain, disability, shoulder mobility, shoulder strength, and quality of life for people with subacromial pain syndrome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness","volume":"22 3","pages":"Pages 237-244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1728869X24000236/pdfft?md5=5b15ead0aef33753e5a4c1f83f4771f8&pid=1-s2.0-S1728869X24000236-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1728869X24000236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objective

Previous studies have indicated that mind-body exercises can reduce pain and improve function for patients with musculoskeletal conditions. Yi Jin Bang is a novel home-based Chinese mind-body Qigong exercise for shoulder pain. However, few studies have evaluated its effects on subacromial pain syndrome. This study aimed to compare the effects of Yi Jin Bang with conventional exercises for subacromial pain syndrome.

Methods

Adults with subacromial pain syndrome (N = 105; mean [SD] age, 37 [16] years; 73 females [70%]; median [IQR] duration of symptoms, 12 [6–24] months) were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (n = 53) or the control group (n = 52). The experimental group performed home-based Yi Jin Bang exercises, whereas the control group performed home-based conventional exercises (stretching, strengthening, and motor control exercises). Both interventions were performed four times a week for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Secondary outcomes included current shoulder pain intensity, active shoulder range of motion, back scratch test, isometric shoulder strength, and health-related quality of life. Assessments were performed at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. The primary endpoint was week 16.

Results

No significant between-group difference was observed in the SPADI score at week 16 (mean difference, Yi Jin Bang minus conventional exercise, 0.14, 95% confidence interval −2.96 to 3.24; p = 0.93).

Conclusion

There were no differences between Yi Jin Bang and conventional exercises in improving pain, disability, shoulder mobility, shoulder strength, and quality of life for people with subacromial pain syndrome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
易筋经与传统运动疗法对肩峰下疼痛综合征患者的影响:随机对照试验
以往的研究表明,意念体操可以减轻肌肉骨骼疾病患者的疼痛并改善其功能。易筋棒是一种治疗肩部疼痛的新型家用中医意念气功锻炼方法。然而,很少有研究评估其对肩峰下疼痛综合征的影响。本研究旨在比较易筋棒与传统锻炼对肩峰下疼痛综合征的效果。患有肩峰下疼痛综合征的成人(人数 = 105;平均 [SD] 年龄,37 16 岁;女性 73 [70%];中位数 [IQR] 症状持续时间,12 [6-24] 个月)被随机分配到实验组(人数 = 53)或对照组(人数 = 52)。实验组在家中进行易筋经锻炼,而对照组在家中进行常规锻炼(伸展、强化和运动控制锻炼)。两种干预措施均为每周四次,持续 16 周。主要结果是肩部疼痛和残疾指数(SPADI)。次要结果包括当前肩部疼痛强度、肩部主动活动范围、背部划痕测试、等长肩部力量以及与健康相关的生活质量。评估在基线和第 4、8、12 和 16 周进行。主要终点是第 16 周。在第16周时,SPADI评分没有观察到明显的组间差异(易筋经与传统锻炼的平均差异为0.14,95%置信区间为-2.96至3.24;=0.93)。在改善肩峰下疼痛综合征患者的疼痛、残疾、肩部活动度、肩部力量和生活质量方面,易筋经和传统锻炼方法没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness is the official peer-reviewed journal of The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness (SCSEPF), the Physical Fitness Association of Hong Kong, China (HKPFA), and the Hong Kong Association of Sports Medicine and Sports Science (HKASMSS). It is published twice a year, in June and December, by Elsevier. The Journal accepts original investigations, comprehensive reviews, case studies and short communications on current topics in exercise science, physical fitness and physical education.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance A longitudinal study to COVID-19 infection among university students: Physical fitness changes and psychological responses Ameliorated lipid distribution in prediabetes - Effects of 12 weeks traditional Chinese YiJinJing exercise plus TheraBand: A randomized controlled trial Dose-response relationship between leisure-time physical activity patterns and phenotypic age acceleration in American adults: A cross-sectional analysis Effects of 8 weeks of rhythmic physical activity on gross motor movements in 4-5-year-olds: A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1