Good-case early-stopping latency of synchronous byzantine reliable broadcast: the deterministic case

IF 1.3 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS Distributed Computing Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1007/s00446-024-00464-6
Timothé Albouy, Davide Frey, Michel Raynal, François Taïani
{"title":"Good-case early-stopping latency of synchronous byzantine reliable broadcast: the deterministic case","authors":"Timothé Albouy, Davide Frey, Michel Raynal, François Taïani","doi":"10.1007/s00446-024-00464-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper considers the good-case latency of Byzantine Reliable Broadcast (BRB), i.e., the time taken by correct processes to deliver a message when the initial sender is correct. This time plays a crucial role in the performance of practical distributed systems. Although significant strides have been made in recent years on this question, progress has mainly focused on either asynchronous or randomized algorithms. By contrast, the good-case latency of deterministic synchronous BRB under a majority of Byzantine faults has been little studied. In particular, it was not known whether a good-case latency below the worst-case bound of <span>\\(t+1\\)</span> rounds could be obtained. This work answers this open question positively and proposes a deterministic synchronous Byzantine reliable broadcast that achieves a good-case latency of <span>\\(\\textsf{max} (2,t+3-c)\\)</span> rounds (or equivalently <span>\\(\\textsf{max} (2,f+t+3-n)\\)</span>), where <i>t</i> is the upper bound on the number of Byzantine processes, <span>\\(f\\le t\\)</span> the number of effectively Byzantine processes, and <span>\\(c=n-f\\)</span> the number of effectively correct processes. The proposed algorithm does not put any constraint on <i>t</i>, and assumes an authenticated setting, in which individual processes can sign the messages they send, and verify the authenticity of the signatures they receive.</p>","PeriodicalId":50569,"journal":{"name":"Distributed Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Distributed Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-024-00464-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper considers the good-case latency of Byzantine Reliable Broadcast (BRB), i.e., the time taken by correct processes to deliver a message when the initial sender is correct. This time plays a crucial role in the performance of practical distributed systems. Although significant strides have been made in recent years on this question, progress has mainly focused on either asynchronous or randomized algorithms. By contrast, the good-case latency of deterministic synchronous BRB under a majority of Byzantine faults has been little studied. In particular, it was not known whether a good-case latency below the worst-case bound of \(t+1\) rounds could be obtained. This work answers this open question positively and proposes a deterministic synchronous Byzantine reliable broadcast that achieves a good-case latency of \(\textsf{max} (2,t+3-c)\) rounds (or equivalently \(\textsf{max} (2,f+t+3-n)\)), where t is the upper bound on the number of Byzantine processes, \(f\le t\) the number of effectively Byzantine processes, and \(c=n-f\) the number of effectively correct processes. The proposed algorithm does not put any constraint on t, and assumes an authenticated setting, in which individual processes can sign the messages they send, and verify the authenticity of the signatures they receive.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同步拜占庭可靠广播的良好情况早期停止延迟:确定性案例
本文考虑了拜占庭可靠广播(Byzantine Reliable Broadcast,BRB)的良好情况延迟,即当初始发送者正确时,正确进程传递信息所需的时间。这段时间对实际分布式系统的性能起着至关重要的作用。虽然近年来在这一问题上取得了长足进步,但进展主要集中在异步或随机算法上。相比之下,人们对大多数拜占庭故障下确定性同步 BRB 的良好情况延迟时间研究甚少。尤其是,人们还不知道能否获得低于最坏情况下的(t+1)轮的良好情况下的延迟。这项工作正面回答了这个开放性问题,并提出了一种确定性同步拜占庭可靠广播,它能实现 \(\textsf{max} (2,t+3-c)\) 轮的良好情况下的延迟(或等价于 \(\textsf{max} (2、t+3-n)),其中 t 是拜占庭进程数量的上限,(f\le t\ )是有效拜占庭进程的数量,(c=n-f\ )是有效正确进程的数量。所提出的算法对 t 不做任何限制,并假定了一个经过验证的环境,在这个环境中,各个进程可以对它们发送的信息进行签名,并验证它们收到的签名的真实性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Distributed Computing
Distributed Computing 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal Distributed Computing provides a forum for original and significant contributions to the theory, design, specification and implementation of distributed systems. Topics covered by the journal include but are not limited to: design and analysis of distributed algorithms; multiprocessor and multi-core architectures and algorithms; synchronization protocols and concurrent programming; distributed operating systems and middleware; fault-tolerance, reliability and availability; architectures and protocols for communication networks and peer-to-peer systems; security in distributed computing, cryptographic protocols; mobile, sensor, and ad hoc networks; internet applications; concurrency theory; specification, semantics, verification, and testing of distributed systems. In general, only original papers will be considered. By virtue of submitting a manuscript to the journal, the authors attest that it has not been published or submitted simultaneously for publication elsewhere. However, papers previously presented in conference proceedings may be submitted in enhanced form. If a paper has appeared previously, in any form, the authors must clearly indicate this and provide an account of the differences between the previously appeared form and the submission.
期刊最新文献
A wait-free queue with polylogarithmic step complexity Deterministic near-optimal distributed listing of cliques On implementing SWMR registers from SWSR registers in systems with Byzantine failures Asymmetric distributed trust Iterative approximate Byzantine consensus in arbitrary directed graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1