Shifting from the treat-to-target to the early highly effective treatment approach in patients with multiple sclerosis - real-world evidence from Germany.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2024-03-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864241237857
Steffeni Papukchieva, Ann-Sophie Stratil, Maria Kahn, Nils-Henning Neß, Maike Hollnagel-Schmitz, Vivien Gerencser, Julia Rustemeier, Markus Eberl, Benjamin Friedrich, Tjalf Ziemssen
{"title":"Shifting from the treat-to-target to the early highly effective treatment approach in patients with multiple sclerosis - real-world evidence from Germany.","authors":"Steffeni Papukchieva, Ann-Sophie Stratil, Maria Kahn, Nils-Henning Neß, Maike Hollnagel-Schmitz, Vivien Gerencser, Julia Rustemeier, Markus Eberl, Benjamin Friedrich, Tjalf Ziemssen","doi":"10.1177/17562864241237857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While evidence highlights the effectiveness of initiating disease-modifying therapy with a high-efficacy medication for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with poor prognostic factors, it remains unclear whether this approach has been adopted by a broad range of MS providers in Germany yet.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the adoption of the early highly effective treatment (EHT) compared to the treat-to-target treatment approach with the option of escalating treatment efficacy over time in Germany based on real-world evidence data.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Patient-level pharmacy dispensing data from the Permea platform were analysed from 2020 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 29,529 therapy beginners (>18 years) were included to analyse shifts in treatment approaches over time and switching behaviour. Medication classification adhered to the German Society of Neurology guidelines and designated fumarates, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide and interferons as low-efficacy category 1 medications; cladribine and S1P-modulators as medium-efficacy category 2 medications; and alemtuzumab, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and rituximab (off-label) as high-efficacy category 3 medications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results show that 70.0% of patients redeemed their first prescription for category 1 medication, 16.3% for category 2 and 13.7% for category 3 medications. The proportion of prescriptions filled shifted from 2020 to 2022 with a decrease of 14.7% for category 1 drugs and an increase of 12.5% for category 3 drugs. 93.2% of patients stayed on their initially prescribed medication category. 3.2% of category 1 and 3.7% of category 2 therapy beginners escalated to category 3 medication. 3.4% of category 3 medication users de-escalated their treatment to category 1 or category 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While most individuals started their treatment according to the treat-to-target approach and remained on their initially prescribed medication category, there has been a steadily increasing shift towards the EHT approach since 2020. These insights demonstrate that, while not officially recommended by German guidelines, MS providers increasingly adopt the EHT approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562864241237857"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10960977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864241237857","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While evidence highlights the effectiveness of initiating disease-modifying therapy with a high-efficacy medication for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with poor prognostic factors, it remains unclear whether this approach has been adopted by a broad range of MS providers in Germany yet.

Objective: To assess the adoption of the early highly effective treatment (EHT) compared to the treat-to-target treatment approach with the option of escalating treatment efficacy over time in Germany based on real-world evidence data.

Design: Patient-level pharmacy dispensing data from the Permea platform were analysed from 2020 to 2022.

Methods: In total, 29,529 therapy beginners (>18 years) were included to analyse shifts in treatment approaches over time and switching behaviour. Medication classification adhered to the German Society of Neurology guidelines and designated fumarates, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide and interferons as low-efficacy category 1 medications; cladribine and S1P-modulators as medium-efficacy category 2 medications; and alemtuzumab, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and rituximab (off-label) as high-efficacy category 3 medications.

Results: Our results show that 70.0% of patients redeemed their first prescription for category 1 medication, 16.3% for category 2 and 13.7% for category 3 medications. The proportion of prescriptions filled shifted from 2020 to 2022 with a decrease of 14.7% for category 1 drugs and an increase of 12.5% for category 3 drugs. 93.2% of patients stayed on their initially prescribed medication category. 3.2% of category 1 and 3.7% of category 2 therapy beginners escalated to category 3 medication. 3.4% of category 3 medication users de-escalated their treatment to category 1 or category 2.

Conclusion: While most individuals started their treatment according to the treat-to-target approach and remained on their initially prescribed medication category, there has been a steadily increasing shift towards the EHT approach since 2020. These insights demonstrate that, while not officially recommended by German guidelines, MS providers increasingly adopt the EHT approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症患者从 "靶向治疗 "转向 "早期高效治疗"--来自德国的真实证据。
背景:虽然有证据表明,对于预后不良的多发性硬化症(MS)患者,使用高效药物启动疾病改变疗法是有效的,但目前仍不清楚这种方法是否已被德国广泛的MS医疗机构所采用:目的:基于真实世界的证据数据,评估德国采用早期高效治疗(EHT)与按目标治疗(Treat-to-Target Treatment)方法的对比情况,以及随着时间推移疗效升级的选择:设计:分析 2020 年至 2022 年 Permea 平台的患者级药房配药数据:方法:共纳入 29529 名治疗开始者(年龄大于 18 岁),以分析治疗方法随时间的变化和转换行为。药物分类遵循德国神经病学会指南,将富马酸盐、醋酸格拉替雷、特立氟胺和干扰素定为低效1类药物;将克拉利宾和S1P调节剂定为中效2类药物;将阿利珠单抗、纳他珠单抗、奥凯利珠单抗、ofatumumab和利妥昔单抗(标签外)定为高效3类药物:结果显示,70.0%的患者首次处方兑换了第 1 类药物,16.3%兑换了第 2 类药物,13.7%兑换了第 3 类药物。从 2020 年到 2022 年,配药处方的比例发生了变化,第 1 类药物减少了 14.7%,第 3 类药物增加了 12.5%。93.2%的患者继续使用最初开具的药物类别。3.2%的第 1 类和 3.7%的第 2 类治疗初学者升级到第 3 类药物。3.4%的第 3 类用药者将治疗升级为第 1 类或第 2 类:虽然大多数人在开始治疗时采用的是 "按目标治疗 "方法,并继续使用最初开具的药物类别,但自 2020 年以来,向 "EHT "方法的转变在稳步增加。这些研究结果表明,尽管德国指南并未正式推荐,但多发性硬化症医疗机构越来越多地采用 EHT 方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
期刊最新文献
Chronic active lesions in multiple sclerosis: classification, terminology, and clinical significance. Early infarct growth rate is associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after endovascular thrombectomy. Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab treatment in refractory MOG-IgG related optic neuritis. Patient flow analysis with fast-track MRI for suspected stroke in the emergency department and associated non-comprehensive stroke center. A rare association of Guillain-Barré syndrome/Miller-Fisher syndrome overlap syndrome and Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 infection: trigger or exacerbating factor?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1