Safety and feasibility of cystic duct control with suture ligation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Mohie El-Din M. Madany, Mansor M. Kabbash, H. A. Mostafa, Ahmed M. Maghraby, Mahmoud S. Ahmed
{"title":"Safety and feasibility of cystic duct control with suture ligation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy","authors":"Mohie El-Din M. Madany, Mansor M. Kabbash, H. A. Mostafa, Ahmed M. Maghraby, Mahmoud S. Ahmed","doi":"10.4103/ejs.ejs_2_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Securing the cystic duct in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) can be achieved through suturing ligation (intracorporeal or extracorporeal), clips, electrocautery, and ultramodern vessel sealing energy devices. Suturing ligation is a safe and a cost-effective measure in low-resource settings such as developing countries.\n \n \n \n The rationale of this current prospective study was to establish the safety and feasibility of intracorporeal suturing ligation for securing the cystic duct during LC in the local setting. Patients who were eligible for LC at the Aswan University Hospital’s General Surgery Department were included.\n \n \n \n In all, 260 patients were included in our study. Most of the participants were females, representing 92.69% of patients. The mean age of participants was 39.82±9.96 years, and 95.77% were overweight or obese. The mean±SD time for cystic duct ligation and closure was 3.03±0.64, and the median [interquartile range (IQR)] was 2.90 min (1.11 min). The mean±SD operative time was 88.19±27.81 min, and the median (IQR) was 84 min (31.75 min). Also, the mean±SD hospital stay was 1.11±0.55 days, and the median (IQR) was 1 day (0 day). There was no intraoperative significant bile duct injury, bile leak, or bleeding. No visceral injury was encountered. The success rate of the operation was 100%. None needed to be redone. No case needed conversion to open surgery. No bile leakage or other complication was seen during the follow-up period.\n \n \n \n In resource-constrained settings, suture ligation of the cystic duct is a safe technique with low rates of postoperative complications. Cystic duct control with intracorporeal suture ligation is an essential technique that can be learned, requiring knot-tying skills.\n","PeriodicalId":22550,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_2_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Securing the cystic duct in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) can be achieved through suturing ligation (intracorporeal or extracorporeal), clips, electrocautery, and ultramodern vessel sealing energy devices. Suturing ligation is a safe and a cost-effective measure in low-resource settings such as developing countries. The rationale of this current prospective study was to establish the safety and feasibility of intracorporeal suturing ligation for securing the cystic duct during LC in the local setting. Patients who were eligible for LC at the Aswan University Hospital’s General Surgery Department were included. In all, 260 patients were included in our study. Most of the participants were females, representing 92.69% of patients. The mean age of participants was 39.82±9.96 years, and 95.77% were overweight or obese. The mean±SD time for cystic duct ligation and closure was 3.03±0.64, and the median [interquartile range (IQR)] was 2.90 min (1.11 min). The mean±SD operative time was 88.19±27.81 min, and the median (IQR) was 84 min (31.75 min). Also, the mean±SD hospital stay was 1.11±0.55 days, and the median (IQR) was 1 day (0 day). There was no intraoperative significant bile duct injury, bile leak, or bleeding. No visceral injury was encountered. The success rate of the operation was 100%. None needed to be redone. No case needed conversion to open surgery. No bile leakage or other complication was seen during the follow-up period. In resource-constrained settings, suture ligation of the cystic duct is a safe technique with low rates of postoperative complications. Cystic duct control with intracorporeal suture ligation is an essential technique that can be learned, requiring knot-tying skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜胆囊切除术中通过缝合结扎控制胆囊管的安全性和可行性
在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中,可通过缝合结扎(体外或体外)、夹子、电灼和超现代化血管密封能量装置来固定胆囊管。在发展中国家等资源匮乏的环境中,缝合结扎是一种安全且具有成本效益的措施。 目前这项前瞻性研究的目的是确定体腔内缝合结扎术的安全性和可行性,以便在当地进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术时固定胆囊管。研究对象包括阿斯旺大学医院普通外科符合腹腔镜手术条件的患者。 共有 260 名患者参与了我们的研究。大部分参与者为女性,占患者总数的 92.69%。参与者的平均年龄为(39.82±9.96)岁,95.77%为超重或肥胖。膀胱导管结扎和闭合的平均±SD时间为(3.03±0.64)分钟,中位数[四分位数间距(IQR)]为2.90分钟(1.11分钟)。手术时间的平均值(±SD)为 88.19±27.81分钟,中位数(IQR)为84分钟(31.75分钟)。此外,平均(±SD)住院时间为 1.11±0.55天,中位数(IQR)为1天(0天)。术中没有出现明显的胆管损伤、胆漏或出血。无内脏损伤。手术成功率为 100%。无一例需要重新手术。没有一例需要转为开放手术。随访期间未发现胆漏或其他并发症。 在资源有限的情况下,缝合结扎胆囊管是一种安全的技术,术后并发症发生率较低。利用体腔内缝合结扎术控制胆囊管是一项可以学会的基本技术,需要打结技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the value of core biopsy for establishing tissue diagnosis compared to excisional biopsy in enlarged cervical lymph nodes Fibrin glue versus sutures for mesh fixation in open repair of inguinal hernia Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy in the management of grades 3 and 4 prolapsed hemorrhoids: A prospective randomized clinical study Solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura Correlating preoperative clinicopathological factors with skin and/ or nipple–areola complex tumor involvement in postmastectomy specimens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1