Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy in the management of grades 3 and 4 prolapsed hemorrhoids: A prospective randomized clinical study

Mark M. Fathy, Hazem A E. Mohamed, Ahmed F. Amer, Karim Almoaty
{"title":"Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy in the management of grades 3 and 4 prolapsed hemorrhoids: A prospective randomized clinical study","authors":"Mark M. Fathy, Hazem A E. Mohamed, Ahmed F. Amer, Karim Almoaty","doi":"10.21608/ejsur.2024.357129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hemorrhoids are a common anorectal condition causing disability and discomfort in symptomatic patients. Several less invasive techniques including stapled hemorrhoidectomy (SH) and Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DHL) with mucopexy have been introduced. In our study, we aim to compare these two techniques. Patients and Methods: We included patients with symptomatic grade 3 or 4 prolapsed piles, aged from 18 to 70 years, who underwent either SH or DHL with mucopexy at the General Surgery Department, Ain Shams University hospitals. We excluded patients with previous anal surgery, hemorrhoids accompanied by other anal conditions such as fissure, fistula, or anal stenosis, impaired anal sphincter function or fecal incontinence, recurrent or complicated hemorrhoids. Patients with debilitating disease or American Society of Anesthesiologists III or IV were also excluded. Results: From July 2021 to July 2023, 40 patients were prospectively included in our study. Twenty patients had DHL with mucopexy with a mean age of 35.3±8.8, while 20 patients underwent SH operation with a mean age 34.8±7.3. Both techniques were comparable with no significant difference between them regarding any of the postoperative anal symptoms, except pain, during 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months of follow-up. Longo (SH) operation has significantly higher early postoperative pain, using the visual analog scale score, compared with DHL (1 month, P=0.03 , 3 months, P=0.02 , and 6 months, P=0.04 ), but no significant difference in late postoperative pain visual analog scale scores. Conclusion: Both techniques are effective in the management of grade 3 or 4 hemorrhoidal disease, but DHL technique has less postoperative pain.","PeriodicalId":22550,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsur.2024.357129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hemorrhoids are a common anorectal condition causing disability and discomfort in symptomatic patients. Several less invasive techniques including stapled hemorrhoidectomy (SH) and Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DHL) with mucopexy have been introduced. In our study, we aim to compare these two techniques. Patients and Methods: We included patients with symptomatic grade 3 or 4 prolapsed piles, aged from 18 to 70 years, who underwent either SH or DHL with mucopexy at the General Surgery Department, Ain Shams University hospitals. We excluded patients with previous anal surgery, hemorrhoids accompanied by other anal conditions such as fissure, fistula, or anal stenosis, impaired anal sphincter function or fecal incontinence, recurrent or complicated hemorrhoids. Patients with debilitating disease or American Society of Anesthesiologists III or IV were also excluded. Results: From July 2021 to July 2023, 40 patients were prospectively included in our study. Twenty patients had DHL with mucopexy with a mean age of 35.3±8.8, while 20 patients underwent SH operation with a mean age 34.8±7.3. Both techniques were comparable with no significant difference between them regarding any of the postoperative anal symptoms, except pain, during 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months of follow-up. Longo (SH) operation has significantly higher early postoperative pain, using the visual analog scale score, compared with DHL (1 month, P=0.03 , 3 months, P=0.02 , and 6 months, P=0.04 ), but no significant difference in late postoperative pain visual analog scale scores. Conclusion: Both techniques are effective in the management of grade 3 or 4 hemorrhoidal disease, but DHL technique has less postoperative pain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多普勒引导下痔动脉结扎加粘膜环切术与痔钉环切术治疗3级和4级脱垂痔的对比:前瞻性随机临床研究
背景:痔疮是一种常见的肛门直肠疾病,会给有症状的患者造成残疾和不适。目前已经出现了几种创伤较小的技术,包括订书钉痔切除术(SH)和多普勒引导下痔动脉结扎术(DHL)加粘膜环切术。在我们的研究中,我们旨在比较这两种技术。患者和方法:我们纳入了在艾因夏姆斯大学医院普外科接受痔动脉结扎术或痔动脉结扎术加粘膜环切术的无症状 3 级或 4 级脱垂痔患者,他们的年龄在 18 岁至 70 岁之间。我们排除了曾接受过肛门手术的患者、痔疮伴有其他肛门疾病(如肛裂、肛瘘或肛门狭窄)的患者、肛门括约肌功能受损或大便失禁的患者、复发性或复杂性痔疮患者。患有衰弱性疾病或美国麻醉医师协会 III 级或 IV 级的患者也被排除在外。研究结果从 2021 年 7 月到 2023 年 7 月,我们共对 40 名患者进行了前瞻性研究。20例患者接受了DHL加粘膜覆盖术,平均年龄(35.3±8.8)岁;20例患者接受了SH手术,平均年龄(34.8±7.3)岁。在 1、3、6、12 和 18 个月的随访期间,这两种技术在除疼痛外的术后肛门症状方面均无明显差异,具有可比性。与 DHL 相比,Longo(SH)手术术后早期疼痛的视觉模拟量表评分明显更高(1 个月,P=0.03;3 个月,P=0.02;6 个月,P=0.04),但术后晚期疼痛的视觉模拟量表评分无明显差异。结论两种技术都能有效治疗 3 级或 4 级痔疮,但 DHL 技术的术后疼痛较轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the value of core biopsy for establishing tissue diagnosis compared to excisional biopsy in enlarged cervical lymph nodes Fibrin glue versus sutures for mesh fixation in open repair of inguinal hernia Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy in the management of grades 3 and 4 prolapsed hemorrhoids: A prospective randomized clinical study Solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura Correlating preoperative clinicopathological factors with skin and/ or nipple–areola complex tumor involvement in postmastectomy specimens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1