Laser hemorrhoidoplasty procedure versus harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy: a comparative study for the treatment of grades III and IV hemorrhoids

Ehab Loutfy, Hatem Elgohary, Mahmoud E. Elkashlan, Mohamed G. Abdelrahman, Wael Omar
{"title":"Laser hemorrhoidoplasty procedure versus harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy: a comparative study for the treatment of grades III and IV hemorrhoids","authors":"Ehab Loutfy, Hatem Elgohary, Mahmoud E. Elkashlan, Mohamed G. Abdelrahman, Wael Omar","doi":"10.4103/ejs.ejs_325_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Hemorrhoids are one of the most commonly presented diagnoses of colorectal diseases. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) and harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy (HSH) in the management of grades III and IV hemorrhoids, focusing on some postoperative complications.\n \n \n \n A randomized, controlled, clinical trial involving 34 patients with grades III and IV hemorrhoids was conducted at the General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, from June 2022 to March 2023. Ethical considerations were adhered to, and patients provided informed consent. The groups underwent either LHP or HSH, and comprehensive patient information was collected, including demographics and preoperative assessments. Postoperative care and follow-up evaluations assessed outcomes such as pain, bleeding, discharge, wound healing, incontinence, recurrence, and stenosis.\n \n \n \n Demographic distribution was similar between the LHP and HSH groups, with comparable operative times. Postoperative bleeding did not significantly differ between groups. HSH was associated with more early discharge, longer wound healing times, and significantly higher postoperative pain levels up to the third week. No significant differences were observed in stenosis, incontinence, or recurrence between the two groups.\n \n \n \n Both HSH and LHP techniques were found to be safe and effective for managing hemorrhoids. LHP demonstrated advantages, including lower postoperative pain levels, reduced seromucous discharge, and faster wound healing compared with HSH. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians in optimizing patient care during the management of hemorrhoids.\n","PeriodicalId":22550,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_325_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hemorrhoids are one of the most commonly presented diagnoses of colorectal diseases. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) and harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy (HSH) in the management of grades III and IV hemorrhoids, focusing on some postoperative complications. A randomized, controlled, clinical trial involving 34 patients with grades III and IV hemorrhoids was conducted at the General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, from June 2022 to March 2023. Ethical considerations were adhered to, and patients provided informed consent. The groups underwent either LHP or HSH, and comprehensive patient information was collected, including demographics and preoperative assessments. Postoperative care and follow-up evaluations assessed outcomes such as pain, bleeding, discharge, wound healing, incontinence, recurrence, and stenosis. Demographic distribution was similar between the LHP and HSH groups, with comparable operative times. Postoperative bleeding did not significantly differ between groups. HSH was associated with more early discharge, longer wound healing times, and significantly higher postoperative pain levels up to the third week. No significant differences were observed in stenosis, incontinence, or recurrence between the two groups. Both HSH and LHP techniques were found to be safe and effective for managing hemorrhoids. LHP demonstrated advantages, including lower postoperative pain levels, reduced seromucous discharge, and faster wound healing compared with HSH. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians in optimizing patient care during the management of hemorrhoids.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光痔疮成形术与谐波刀痔疮切除术:治疗 III 级和 IV 级痔疮的比较研究
痔疮是最常见的结直肠疾病诊断之一。本研究旨在评估和比较激光痔疮成形术(LHP)和谐波刀痔疮切除术(HSH)在治疗III级和IV级痔疮方面的效果,重点关注术后并发症。 2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 3 月,赫勒万大学医学院普外科开展了一项随机对照临床试验,34 名 III 级和 IV 级痔疮患者参与了试验。试验遵守了伦理道德,患者也提供了知情同意书。各组患者均接受了 LHP 或 HSH 手术,并收集了全面的患者信息,包括人口统计学和术前评估。术后护理和随访评估的结果包括疼痛、出血、出院、伤口愈合、大小便失禁、复发和狭窄。 LHP 组和 HSH 组的人口分布相似,手术时间相当。两组术后出血量无明显差异。HSH 组患者更容易提前出院,伤口愈合时间更长,术后第三周的疼痛程度明显更高。两组在狭窄、失禁或复发方面没有明显差异。 研究发现,HSH 和 LHP 技术都能安全有效地治疗痔疮。与 HSH 相比,LHP 显示出更多优势,包括术后疼痛程度更低、浆液性分泌物更少以及伤口愈合更快。这些研究结果为临床医生在痔疮治疗过程中优化患者护理提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the value of core biopsy for establishing tissue diagnosis compared to excisional biopsy in enlarged cervical lymph nodes Fibrin glue versus sutures for mesh fixation in open repair of inguinal hernia Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy in the management of grades 3 and 4 prolapsed hemorrhoids: A prospective randomized clinical study Solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura Correlating preoperative clinicopathological factors with skin and/ or nipple–areola complex tumor involvement in postmastectomy specimens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1