From Openness to Inclusion: Toward a Democratic Approach to Migration Policy

Nathan Pippenger
{"title":"From Openness to Inclusion: Toward a Democratic Approach to Migration Policy","authors":"Nathan Pippenger","doi":"10.1017/s153759272400001x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many theorists argue that justice in international migration requires states to maximize the openness of their borders, even when that can only be done by denying full political membership to some migrants. In contrast, this article contends that democratic ideals recommend inclusion as the guiding principle of migration policy, since full membership for all the state’s residents is the only way to preserve democratic self-rule, whereas the justice- and freedom-related goals associated with openness can be promoted via other means. I define full inclusion as involving not only formal rights, but also solidarity. Against accounts that define solidarity in terms of shared identity (i.e., a specific commonality), I argue that democratic solidarity requires intersubjective “identification” among members of the demos, oriented toward their shared future. This account suggests how migration policy might advance the practical goal of more open borders, along with other moral goals associated with calls for greater openness, without sacrificing important democratic ideals.","PeriodicalId":508086,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Politics","volume":"3 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s153759272400001x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many theorists argue that justice in international migration requires states to maximize the openness of their borders, even when that can only be done by denying full political membership to some migrants. In contrast, this article contends that democratic ideals recommend inclusion as the guiding principle of migration policy, since full membership for all the state’s residents is the only way to preserve democratic self-rule, whereas the justice- and freedom-related goals associated with openness can be promoted via other means. I define full inclusion as involving not only formal rights, but also solidarity. Against accounts that define solidarity in terms of shared identity (i.e., a specific commonality), I argue that democratic solidarity requires intersubjective “identification” among members of the demos, oriented toward their shared future. This account suggests how migration policy might advance the practical goal of more open borders, along with other moral goals associated with calls for greater openness, without sacrificing important democratic ideals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从开放到包容:以民主方式制定移民政策
许多理论家认为,国际移民的公正性要求国家最大限度地开放边界,即使只有通过剥夺某些移民的正式政治成员资格才能做到这一点。与此相反,本文认为,民主理想建议将包容作为移民政策的指导原则,因为所有国家居民的正式成员资格是维护民主自治的唯一途径,而与开放性相关的正义和自由目标则可以通过其他途径来促进。我将完全包容定义为不仅涉及正式权利,还涉及团结。与从共同身份(即特定的共性)角度定义团结的观点不同,我认为民主团结需要民主群体成员之间的主体间 "认同",面向共同的未来。这一观点提出了移民政策如何在不牺牲重要的民主理想的前提下,推进边境更加开放的实际目标,以及与呼吁更加开放相关的其他道德目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Estimating Disenfranchisement in US Elections, 1870–1970 Varieties of State-Building: Ecology, Clientelism, and Bureaucratic Rule in Chile From Openness to Inclusion: Toward a Democratic Approach to Migration Policy Varieties of Indoctrination: The Politicization of Education and the Media around the World Structure, Agency, and Structural Reform: The Case of the European Central Bank
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1