Evaluation of Syphilis Screening Results in Donors Applying to a Transfusion Center of a Tertiary Hospital

Y. Çekli
{"title":"Evaluation of Syphilis Screening Results in Donors Applying to a Transfusion Center of a Tertiary Hospital","authors":"Y. Çekli","doi":"10.18663/tjcl.1445369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: In blood banking, the significance of diagnosing syphilis, a condition caused by Treponema pallidum, cannot be overstated. It necessitates the adoption of the most appropriate algorithm for catching possible cases among donors, thereby minimizing donor loss. The World Health Organization in 2003, and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control in 2010, advised starting syphilis screenings with Treponemal tests. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of confirmatory tests conducted on blood donor candidates with reactive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) test results in syphilis screening. \nMaterial and Methods: In this retrospective study, 69,127 donors who applied as blood donors to the blood bank of a Training and Research Hospital between 2014 and 2021 were examined. Specimens from donor candidates who tested reactive in the syphilis screening test were dispatched to the Microbiology Reference Laboratory of the Turkey Public Health Institution for verification tests. The Fluorescent Treponemal Antibody Absorption (FTA-ABS) or Treponema Pallidum Hemagglutination Assay (TPHA) tests were utilized as the verification tests. \nResults: Reactive test results were obtained repeatedly in 128 donors (0.18%). As a confirmatory test, TPHA was administered to 32 donors, resulting in 11 positive outcomes (34.3%) (False positivity ratio = 65.7%). FTA-ABS was performed as a verification test on 96 donors, with 59 (61.4%) testing positive (False positivity ratio = 38.6%). Out of 48 donors with an ELISA signal-to-cutoff ratio above five, the FTA-ABS test was conducted on 42, yielding 41 positive and one negative result. \nConclusion: The study suggests that using FTA-ABS as a confirmatory test for ELISA-reactive donors improves syphilis detection accuracy.","PeriodicalId":510540,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.1445369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: In blood banking, the significance of diagnosing syphilis, a condition caused by Treponema pallidum, cannot be overstated. It necessitates the adoption of the most appropriate algorithm for catching possible cases among donors, thereby minimizing donor loss. The World Health Organization in 2003, and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control in 2010, advised starting syphilis screenings with Treponemal tests. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of confirmatory tests conducted on blood donor candidates with reactive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) test results in syphilis screening. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, 69,127 donors who applied as blood donors to the blood bank of a Training and Research Hospital between 2014 and 2021 were examined. Specimens from donor candidates who tested reactive in the syphilis screening test were dispatched to the Microbiology Reference Laboratory of the Turkey Public Health Institution for verification tests. The Fluorescent Treponemal Antibody Absorption (FTA-ABS) or Treponema Pallidum Hemagglutination Assay (TPHA) tests were utilized as the verification tests. Results: Reactive test results were obtained repeatedly in 128 donors (0.18%). As a confirmatory test, TPHA was administered to 32 donors, resulting in 11 positive outcomes (34.3%) (False positivity ratio = 65.7%). FTA-ABS was performed as a verification test on 96 donors, with 59 (61.4%) testing positive (False positivity ratio = 38.6%). Out of 48 donors with an ELISA signal-to-cutoff ratio above five, the FTA-ABS test was conducted on 42, yielding 41 positive and one negative result. Conclusion: The study suggests that using FTA-ABS as a confirmatory test for ELISA-reactive donors improves syphilis detection accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一家三甲医院输血中心对捐献者梅毒筛查结果的评估
目的:梅毒是由苍白螺旋体引起的一种疾病,在血库中,诊断梅毒的重要性怎么强调都不为过。这就需要采用最合适的算法来发现献血者中可能存在的病例,从而最大限度地减少献血者的损失。世界卫生组织和欧洲疾病预防与控制中心分别于2003年和2010年建议从特雷波纳试验开始进行梅毒筛查。本研究旨在调查在梅毒筛查中对酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)结果呈反应性的献血者候选人进行确证试验的结果。材料与方法:在这项回顾性研究中,对 2014 年至 2021 年期间向一家培训与研究医院血库申请献血的 69 127 名献血者进行了检查。梅毒筛查检测呈反应性的候选献血者标本被送往土耳其公共卫生机构的微生物参考实验室进行验证检测。验证试验采用荧光特雷波尼马抗体吸收试验(FTA-ABS)或苍白螺旋体血凝试验(TPHA)。结果128 名捐献者(0.18%)重复获得了反应性测试结果。作为确证试验,对 32 名捐献者进行了 TPHA 试验,结果有 11 人呈阳性(34.3%)(假阳性率 = 65.7%)。作为验证试验,对 96 名捐献者进行了 FTA-ABS,其中 59 人(61.4%)检测结果呈阳性(假阳性率 = 38.6%)。在酶联免疫吸附试验信号与截断比超过 5 的 48 名供体中,对 42 名供体进行了 FTA-ABS 试验,结果 41 人呈阳性,1 人呈阴性。结论研究表明,使用 FTA-ABS 作为 ELISA 反应供体的确证试验可提高梅毒检测的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Çocuklarda COVID-19 sonrası streptokokal tonsillofarenjit sıklığındaki değişiklikler Diagnostic Performance of Scoring Systems in Non-Biliary Acute Pancreatitis Prognosis: A Comparative Analysis of Ranson and Balthazar Scores Evaluation of Syphilis Screening Results in Donors Applying to a Transfusion Center of a Tertiary Hospital Akalazya Hastalarında Peroral Endoskopik Miyotominin Etkinliği ve Güvenliği Açık kalp ameliyatı geçiren ileri yaştaki hastalarda akut böbrek hasarı için risk faktörleri
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1