Analysis of E-Scooter Crashes in the City of Bari

Paola Longo, N. Berloco, S. Coropulis, P. Intini, V. Ranieri
{"title":"Analysis of E-Scooter Crashes in the City of Bari","authors":"Paola Longo, N. Berloco, S. Coropulis, P. Intini, V. Ranieri","doi":"10.3390/infrastructures9030063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The remarkable impact that e-scooters have had on the transportation system drives research on this phenomenon. The widespread use of e-scooters also poses several new safety issues, which should be necessarily studied. The aim of this paper points in this direction, investigating the main contributing factors, causes, and patterns of recorded e-scooter crashes, considering also different crash types and severity, using the City of Bari (Italy) as a case study. The crash dataset based on police reports and referring to the period July 2020–November 2022 (i.e., the first period of e-scooter implementation in the City of Bari) was investigated. Crashes were clustered according to several variables. No fatal crashes occurred, even though crashes mostly resulted in injuries (70%). Considering road type, divided roads were found to be less safe than undivided ones, due to higher mean speeds than on other roads and to a less constrained e-scooter driving behavior. Calm (off-peak) daytime hours seem to lead to more frequent e-scooter crashes with respect to both peak and nighttime hours, even if the latter hours are associated with an increased severity. Once controlled for exposure, season, lighting conditions, and the private/sharing ratio do not seem influential. E-scooters are more prone to be involved in single-vehicle and pedestrian crashes at segments than other vehicles, but they show similar crash trends than other vehicles (i.e., angle crashes) at intersections. As emerged from traffic surveys, not all e-scooter users were found to use cycle paths. Combining this information with crash data, it seems that not using cycle paths is considerably less safe than using them. Besides engineering measures and policies, awareness campaigns should be promoted to elicit safe users’ behavior and to tackle the several violations and misbehaviors emerging from the crash data.","PeriodicalId":502683,"journal":{"name":"Infrastructures","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infrastructures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9030063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The remarkable impact that e-scooters have had on the transportation system drives research on this phenomenon. The widespread use of e-scooters also poses several new safety issues, which should be necessarily studied. The aim of this paper points in this direction, investigating the main contributing factors, causes, and patterns of recorded e-scooter crashes, considering also different crash types and severity, using the City of Bari (Italy) as a case study. The crash dataset based on police reports and referring to the period July 2020–November 2022 (i.e., the first period of e-scooter implementation in the City of Bari) was investigated. Crashes were clustered according to several variables. No fatal crashes occurred, even though crashes mostly resulted in injuries (70%). Considering road type, divided roads were found to be less safe than undivided ones, due to higher mean speeds than on other roads and to a less constrained e-scooter driving behavior. Calm (off-peak) daytime hours seem to lead to more frequent e-scooter crashes with respect to both peak and nighttime hours, even if the latter hours are associated with an increased severity. Once controlled for exposure, season, lighting conditions, and the private/sharing ratio do not seem influential. E-scooters are more prone to be involved in single-vehicle and pedestrian crashes at segments than other vehicles, but they show similar crash trends than other vehicles (i.e., angle crashes) at intersections. As emerged from traffic surveys, not all e-scooter users were found to use cycle paths. Combining this information with crash data, it seems that not using cycle paths is considerably less safe than using them. Besides engineering measures and policies, awareness campaigns should be promoted to elicit safe users’ behavior and to tackle the several violations and misbehaviors emerging from the crash data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴里市电动滑板车碰撞事故分析
电动滑板车对交通系统产生的巨大影响推动了对这一现象的研究。电动滑板车的广泛使用也带来了一些新的安全问题,必须对此进行研究。本文的目的正是指向这一方向,以意大利巴里市为案例,调查记录在案的电动滑板车碰撞事故的主要促成因素、原因和模式,同时考虑不同的碰撞类型和严重程度。根据警方报告,对 2020 年 7 月至 2022 年 11 月期间(即巴里市实施电动摩托车的第一阶段)的碰撞数据集进行了调查。根据几个变量对事故进行了分类。尽管大部分事故都造成了人员伤亡(70%),但没有发生致命事故。考虑到道路类型,发现分隔道路的安全性低于未分隔道路,原因是平均车速高于其他道路,以及电动摩托车驾驶行为受到的限制较少。相对于高峰时段和夜间时段,平静的(非高峰时段)白天似乎会导致更频繁的电动摩托车碰撞事故,尽管夜间时段的严重程度会增加。一旦控制了暴露程度,季节、照明条件和私人/共享比例似乎都不会产生影响。与其他车辆相比,电动滑板车更容易在路段发生单车和行人碰撞事故,但与其他车辆相比,它们在交叉路口表现出类似的碰撞趋势(即角度碰撞)。交通调查显示,并非所有电动滑板车用户都使用自行车道。将这一信息与碰撞事故数据相结合,似乎不使用自行车道比使用自行车道更不安全。除工程措施和政策外,还应开展宣传活动,以激发用户的安全行为,并解决碰撞事故数据中出现的若干违规和不当行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Pigment-Modified Clear Binders and Asphalts: An Approach towards Sustainable, Heat Harvesting, and Non-Black Pavements Traffic Flow Optimization at Toll Plaza Using Proactive Deep Learning Strategies Track Deterioration Model—State of the Art and Research Potentials Microstructural and Residual Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete Containing Waste Copper Slag as Fine Aggregate Exposed to Ambient and Elevated Temperatures Building Information Modeling/Building Energy Simulation Integration Based on Quantitative and Interpretative Interoperability Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1