Building Information Modeling/Building Energy Simulation Integration Based on Quantitative and Interpretative Interoperability Analysis

Carolina Fernandes Vaz, Luísa Lopes de Freitas Guilherme, A. C. F. Maciel, André Luis De Araujo, B. B. F. Da Costa, A. Haddad
{"title":"Building Information Modeling/Building Energy Simulation Integration Based on Quantitative and Interpretative Interoperability Analysis","authors":"Carolina Fernandes Vaz, Luísa Lopes de Freitas Guilherme, A. C. F. Maciel, André Luis De Araujo, B. B. F. Da Costa, A. Haddad","doi":"10.3390/infrastructures9050084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The integration between the building information modeling (BIM) methodology and the building energy simulation (BES) can contribute to a thermo-energetic analysis since the model generated and fed into BIM is exported to simulation software. This integration, also called interoperability, is satisfactory when the information flow is carried out without the loss of essential information. Several studies point out interoperability flaws between the methodologies; however, most of them occur in low-geometry-complexity models during quantitative experiments. The purpose of this research was to analyze the BIM/BES integration based on a quantitative and interpretative interoperability analysis of two buildings with complex geometries located on the UFU Campus (library and Building 5T) in Uberlândia, Brazil. To accomplish this, two geometries of each building were modeled, detailed, and simplified to analyze the data import, workflow, and model correction in the BES software. In the case of the library, the integration of Revit with DesignBuilder and IES-VE was analyzed, and in Block 5T, Revit was used with DesignBuilder and eQUEST. The BES software that presented the best integration with Revit for complex geometries was DesignBuilder, with the best performance being in the interpretative criteria. It was concluded that the simplification of complex geometries is essential for better data transfers. To determine the BES software that has better integration with BIM, a comprehensive evaluation is necessary, considering not only data transfers but also ease of working within BES software, the possibility of corrections in these, as well as the availability of tutorials and developer support.","PeriodicalId":502683,"journal":{"name":"Infrastructures","volume":"155 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infrastructures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9050084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration between the building information modeling (BIM) methodology and the building energy simulation (BES) can contribute to a thermo-energetic analysis since the model generated and fed into BIM is exported to simulation software. This integration, also called interoperability, is satisfactory when the information flow is carried out without the loss of essential information. Several studies point out interoperability flaws between the methodologies; however, most of them occur in low-geometry-complexity models during quantitative experiments. The purpose of this research was to analyze the BIM/BES integration based on a quantitative and interpretative interoperability analysis of two buildings with complex geometries located on the UFU Campus (library and Building 5T) in Uberlândia, Brazil. To accomplish this, two geometries of each building were modeled, detailed, and simplified to analyze the data import, workflow, and model correction in the BES software. In the case of the library, the integration of Revit with DesignBuilder and IES-VE was analyzed, and in Block 5T, Revit was used with DesignBuilder and eQUEST. The BES software that presented the best integration with Revit for complex geometries was DesignBuilder, with the best performance being in the interpretative criteria. It was concluded that the simplification of complex geometries is essential for better data transfers. To determine the BES software that has better integration with BIM, a comprehensive evaluation is necessary, considering not only data transfers but also ease of working within BES software, the possibility of corrections in these, as well as the availability of tutorials and developer support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于定量和解释性互操作性分析的建筑信息建模/建筑能耗模拟集成
建筑信息模型(BIM)方法与建筑能耗模拟(BES)之间的整合有助于热能分析,因为生成并输入 BIM 的模型可以导出到模拟软件中。当信息流在不丢失基本信息的情况下进行时,这种集成(也称为互操作性)是令人满意的。有几项研究指出了这些方法之间的互操作性缺陷;然而,这些缺陷大多发生在定量实验中的低几何复杂度模型中。本研究的目的是通过对位于巴西乌贝兰迪亚 Uberlândia 的 UFU 校园(图书馆和 5T 号楼)的两座几何形状复杂的建筑进行定量和解释性互操作性分析,来分析 BIM/BES 集成。为了实现这一目标,对每栋建筑的两个几何形状进行了建模、细化和简化,以分析 BES 软件中的数据导入、工作流程和模型校正。在图书馆中,分析了 Revit 与 DesignBuilder 和 IES-VE 的集成情况,而在 5T 区中,则使用了 Revit 与 DesignBuilder 和 eQUEST 的集成情况。在复杂几何图形方面,与 Revit 集成度最高的 BES 软件是 DesignBuilder,其最佳性能体现在解释性标准方面。结论是,复杂几何图形的简化对于更好地传输数据至关重要。要确定与 BIM 集成度更高的 BES 软件,有必要进行综合评估,不仅要考虑数据传输,还要考虑 BES 软件的易用性、修正的可能性以及教程和开发人员支持的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Pigment-Modified Clear Binders and Asphalts: An Approach towards Sustainable, Heat Harvesting, and Non-Black Pavements Traffic Flow Optimization at Toll Plaza Using Proactive Deep Learning Strategies Track Deterioration Model—State of the Art and Research Potentials Microstructural and Residual Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete Containing Waste Copper Slag as Fine Aggregate Exposed to Ambient and Elevated Temperatures Building Information Modeling/Building Energy Simulation Integration Based on Quantitative and Interpretative Interoperability Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1