Predictive Value of Global Longitudinal Strain on the Recovery of Left Ventricular Function Following ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

A. Attar, Mahboobeh Zahed, Alireza Hosseinpour, Pouria Azami, Jahangir Kamalpour, Mahmood Zamirian
{"title":"Predictive Value of Global Longitudinal Strain on the Recovery of Left Ventricular Function Following ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction","authors":"A. Attar, Mahboobeh Zahed, Alireza Hosseinpour, Pouria Azami, Jahangir Kamalpour, Mahmood Zamirian","doi":"10.5812/semj-142307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Identifying reliable predictors for ventricular recovery at the outset is crucial for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the role of baseline global longitudinal strain (GLS) in predicting myocardial recovery following an acute infarction. Methods: We enrolled 60 consecutive patients diagnosed with STEMI and admitted to Al-Zahra Hospital for PCI from March 2022 to March 2023. Echocardiography was performed on all patients within 48 hours after revascularization to measure baseline parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and GLS. Follow-up echocardiography was conducted 6 months later to reassess LVEF. Results: At the 6-month follow-up, 38 (63.3%) patients showed a ≥ 5% improvement in LVEF, indicating ventricular recovery. The change in GLS was significantly different between the groups (recovered: -4.72 ± 2.00, not recovered: -2.41 ± 2.15, P < 0.001). A baseline GLS ≤ -4.5 and > -14.8 was predictive of either failure to recover or successful recovery of LVEF with 100% negative and positive predictive values, respectively. Baseline GLS values > -9.2 were predictive of LV recovery with 50% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity (P = 0.0002, AUC (95% confidence interval) = 0.697 (0.594, 0.799)). The type of revascularization was linked to better prediction outcomes, with patients undergoing primary and rescue PCIs more likely to recover during the follow-up period compared to those receiving deferred PCI after 24 hours (P = 0.032). Conclusions: While certain baseline GLS value thresholds may serve as predictors of LVEF recovery in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, further prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to establish more precise cut-off values.","PeriodicalId":507014,"journal":{"name":"Shiraz E-Medical Journal","volume":"49 41","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shiraz E-Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-142307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying reliable predictors for ventricular recovery at the outset is crucial for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the role of baseline global longitudinal strain (GLS) in predicting myocardial recovery following an acute infarction. Methods: We enrolled 60 consecutive patients diagnosed with STEMI and admitted to Al-Zahra Hospital for PCI from March 2022 to March 2023. Echocardiography was performed on all patients within 48 hours after revascularization to measure baseline parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and GLS. Follow-up echocardiography was conducted 6 months later to reassess LVEF. Results: At the 6-month follow-up, 38 (63.3%) patients showed a ≥ 5% improvement in LVEF, indicating ventricular recovery. The change in GLS was significantly different between the groups (recovered: -4.72 ± 2.00, not recovered: -2.41 ± 2.15, P < 0.001). A baseline GLS ≤ -4.5 and > -14.8 was predictive of either failure to recover or successful recovery of LVEF with 100% negative and positive predictive values, respectively. Baseline GLS values > -9.2 were predictive of LV recovery with 50% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity (P = 0.0002, AUC (95% confidence interval) = 0.697 (0.594, 0.799)). The type of revascularization was linked to better prediction outcomes, with patients undergoing primary and rescue PCIs more likely to recover during the follow-up period compared to those receiving deferred PCI after 24 hours (P = 0.032). Conclusions: While certain baseline GLS value thresholds may serve as predictors of LVEF recovery in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, further prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to establish more precise cut-off values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整体纵向应变对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死后左心室功能恢复的预测价值
背景:对于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者来说,从一开始就确定心室恢复的可靠预测指标至关重要。研究目的本研究旨在评估基线整体纵向应变(GLS)在预测急性心梗后心肌恢复中的作用。研究方法我们在 2022 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月期间连续招募了 60 名确诊为 STEMI 并入住 Al-Zahra 医院接受 PCI 治疗的患者。所有患者均在血管重建后 48 小时内进行了超声心动图检查,以测量基线参数,包括左室射血分数(LVEF)和 GLS。6 个月后进行随访超声心动图检查,以重新评估 LVEF。结果:在6个月的随访中,38名(63.3%)患者的LVEF改善了≥5%,表明心室恢复。两组患者的 GLS 变化有明显差异(恢复:-4.72 ± 2.00,未恢复:-2.41 ± 2.15,P < 0.001)。基线 GLS ≤ -4.5 和 > -14.8 可预测 LVEF 未能恢复或成功恢复,阴性预测值和阳性预测值分别为 100%。基线 GLS 值 > -9.2 可预测 LV 恢复,敏感性为 50%,特异性为 83.3%(P = 0.0002,AUC(95% 置信区间)= 0.697 (0.594, 0.799))。血管重建类型与更好的预测结果有关,与 24 小时后接受延迟 PCI 的患者相比,接受初治和抢救性 PCI 的患者在随访期间更有可能恢复(P = 0.032)。结论虽然某些基线 GLS 值阈值可作为接受初级 PCI 的 STEMI 患者 LVEF 恢复的预测指标,但仍需进一步开展更大规模的前瞻性研究,以确定更精确的临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Iranian Family Physicians’ Knowledge Toward Colorectal Cancer Screening, Risk Factors, and Sings and Symptoms Persian Mobile Apps for Diabetic Patients: App Review and Evaluation Study The Correlation Between Lighting Intensity, Eye Fatigue, Occupational Stress, and Sleep Quality in the Control Room Operators of Abadan Refinery Restricting Driving Privileges of Individuals with Mental Health Problems: A Legal Gap in Iran Artificial Intelligence in Diabetes Management: Revolutionizing the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus; a Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1