A Contrastive Study of the Translator’s Behaviour in English and Spanish Translations of Metaphors in Xi Jinping: The Governance of China

Jiang Chang, Luo Ying
{"title":"A Contrastive Study of the Translator’s Behaviour in English and Spanish Translations of Metaphors in Xi Jinping: The Governance of China","authors":"Jiang Chang, Luo Ying","doi":"10.18002/sin.v17i2.8235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the English and Spanish translations of metaphors in Xi Jinping: The Governance of China (I-III) within the theoretical framework of Translator Behavior Criticism. In the description of the translators’ behavioral tendencies and diachronic changes, differences are identified between the English and Spanish translating teams with regards to their philosophy of translation, which leads to an analysis of the social motivations of the translators’ behaviors within the field of political discourse translation in China. The following findings have been derived: 1) The Spanish translation is faithful to the form of expression of the ST, which suggests a translators’ behavioral tendency towards the “truth-seeking” principle. The English translation is freer since it upholds a semantic rather than formal equivalence to the ST, suggesting that the English translating team is more oriented towards the “utility-attaining” principle than their Spanish counterparts. 2) Observed from a diachronic perspective, the English translating team always maintained a balance between the two above-mentioned principles in translating the metaphors and their “truth-seeking” and “utility-attaining” behaviors were both enhanced in their translation of the third volume. The Spanish translating team always tilted towards the “truth-seeking” principle, demonstrating just a slight increase of “utility-attaining” behavior throughout their translation of the three volumes. 3) There is an evident difference between the English and Spanish translating teams regarding their “philosophy of faithfulness”. A “semantic” faithfulness with pragmatic concerns advocated by the former team is becoming the mainstream norm governing the current field of political discourse translation in China.","PeriodicalId":179379,"journal":{"name":"Sinología hispánica. China Studies Review","volume":"4 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sinología hispánica. China Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18002/sin.v17i2.8235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the English and Spanish translations of metaphors in Xi Jinping: The Governance of China (I-III) within the theoretical framework of Translator Behavior Criticism. In the description of the translators’ behavioral tendencies and diachronic changes, differences are identified between the English and Spanish translating teams with regards to their philosophy of translation, which leads to an analysis of the social motivations of the translators’ behaviors within the field of political discourse translation in China. The following findings have been derived: 1) The Spanish translation is faithful to the form of expression of the ST, which suggests a translators’ behavioral tendency towards the “truth-seeking” principle. The English translation is freer since it upholds a semantic rather than formal equivalence to the ST, suggesting that the English translating team is more oriented towards the “utility-attaining” principle than their Spanish counterparts. 2) Observed from a diachronic perspective, the English translating team always maintained a balance between the two above-mentioned principles in translating the metaphors and their “truth-seeking” and “utility-attaining” behaviors were both enhanced in their translation of the third volume. The Spanish translating team always tilted towards the “truth-seeking” principle, demonstrating just a slight increase of “utility-attaining” behavior throughout their translation of the three volumes. 3) There is an evident difference between the English and Spanish translating teams regarding their “philosophy of faithfulness”. A “semantic” faithfulness with pragmatic concerns advocated by the former team is becoming the mainstream norm governing the current field of political discourse translation in China.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
习近平用典》中隐喻的英西翻译中译者行为的对比研究:中国的治理
本研究在 "译者行为批评 "的理论框架下,对《习近平谈治国理政》(一至三)中隐喻的英文和西班牙文翻译进行了研究:中国的治理》(I-III)中隐喻的英语和西班牙语翻译。在对译者行为倾向和对时变化的描述中,发现英西翻译团队在翻译理念上的差异,进而分析中国政治话语翻译领域中译者行为的社会动因。得出以下结论:1)西文译文忠实于政治话语的表达形式,表明译者的行为倾向于 "求真 "原则。英译本则更为自由,因为它坚持了与 ST 的语义等同而非形式等同,这表明英语翻译团队比西班牙语翻译团队更倾向于 "实用性 "原则。2)从非同步角度观察,英译团队在翻译隐喻时始终在上述两个原则之间保持平衡,其 "求真 "和 "实用 "行为在第三卷的翻译中都得到了加强。西班牙文翻译团队在三卷的翻译过程中始终倾向于 "求真 "原则,"功利 "行为只是略有增加。3) 英语和西班牙语翻译团队在 "忠实哲学 "方面存在明显差异。前者所倡导的 "语义 "忠实与实用主义关切正在成为当前中国政治话语翻译领域的主流规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
El ChatGPT como agente conversacional en el aprendizaje de la lengua china para los hispanohablantes La Adaptación de la Generación 1.5 de los Inmigrantes Chinos en España El hilo del pensamiento paisajero en China: del Lago del Oeste a la civilización ecológica en el siglo XXI Análisis de la metáfora en el discurso político: un estudio comparativo de los presidentes chino y español Aproximación a la relación sino-europea a través de las diferentes traducciones de Historia del gran reino de la China de Juan González de Mendoza
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1