ADVANTAGES AND BARRIERS FOR USE OF EXCAVATED SEDIMENTS

B. Zlender, P. Jelušič
{"title":"ADVANTAGES AND BARRIERS FOR USE OF EXCAVATED SEDIMENTS","authors":"B. Zlender, P. Jelušič","doi":"10.14455/isec.2024.11(1).sus-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil excavation, including extraction from rivers, lakes, and marine sediments, can lead to a large surplus of clean or slightly contaminated excavated soil. All excavated soil is treated as waste until it is reused. Therefore, the reuse of excavated soil is an important part of sustainable construction, which also helps reduce carbon emissions and lower the cost of earthworks. The reuse of excavated soil is generally viewed positively, but there is a lack of uniform definition of construction waste and a lack of guidance and understanding of reuse. This article discusses the use of excavated soil and provides advice for good practice in the future, considering regulatory, economic, environmental, and implementation aspects. Regulatory aspects refer to the complex legislation and the lack of guidelines for reusing excavated soil. Economic aspects relate to integrated planning, including contracts for construction projects, and the interest of those involved in construction. The environmental aspect includes the impact of reused material on the soil. Logistical obstacles are discussed, which include both spatial and temporal problems due to difficulties in moving excavated soil, storing it, and coordinating supply and demand. Barriers to performing the work are related to the lack of standardization of tests to demonstrate that the geochemical and geotechnical quality of the excavated soil is suitable for reuse. Examples of the reuse of surface, river, lake, and marine soils and possible solutions to overcome the barriers to their use contributed to a proposal for increased use of excavated soils and sediments.","PeriodicalId":477265,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14455/isec.2024.11(1).sus-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil excavation, including extraction from rivers, lakes, and marine sediments, can lead to a large surplus of clean or slightly contaminated excavated soil. All excavated soil is treated as waste until it is reused. Therefore, the reuse of excavated soil is an important part of sustainable construction, which also helps reduce carbon emissions and lower the cost of earthworks. The reuse of excavated soil is generally viewed positively, but there is a lack of uniform definition of construction waste and a lack of guidance and understanding of reuse. This article discusses the use of excavated soil and provides advice for good practice in the future, considering regulatory, economic, environmental, and implementation aspects. Regulatory aspects refer to the complex legislation and the lack of guidelines for reusing excavated soil. Economic aspects relate to integrated planning, including contracts for construction projects, and the interest of those involved in construction. The environmental aspect includes the impact of reused material on the soil. Logistical obstacles are discussed, which include both spatial and temporal problems due to difficulties in moving excavated soil, storing it, and coordinating supply and demand. Barriers to performing the work are related to the lack of standardization of tests to demonstrate that the geochemical and geotechnical quality of the excavated soil is suitable for reuse. Examples of the reuse of surface, river, lake, and marine soils and possible solutions to overcome the barriers to their use contributed to a proposal for increased use of excavated soils and sediments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用挖掘沉积物的优势和障碍
土壤挖掘,包括从河流、湖泊和海洋沉积物中提取土壤,会导致大量剩余的清洁或轻微污染的挖掘土壤。在重新利用之前,所有挖掘出的土壤都被视为废物。因此,对挖掘出的土壤进行再利用是可持续建筑的重要组成部分,也有助于减少碳排放和降低土方工程成本。人们普遍对挖掘出的土壤的再利用持积极态度,但对建筑垃圾缺乏统一的定义,也缺乏对再利用的指导和理解。本文从监管、经济、环境和实施等方面出发,讨论了挖掘土的利用问题,并为今后的良好做法提供了建议。监管方面指的是复杂的立法和缺乏对挖掘出的土壤进行再利用的指导方针。经济方面涉及综合规划,包括建设项目合同以及参与建设者的利益。环境方面包括再利用材料对土壤的影响。还讨论了后勤方面的障碍,其中包括空间和时间方面的问题,因为挖掘出的土壤在运输、储存和供需协调方面存在困难。开展这项工作的障碍与缺乏标准化测试有关,这些测试可证明挖掘出的土壤的地球化学和岩土工程质量适合再利用。地表土、河流土、湖泊土和海洋土的再利用实例,以及克服其使用障碍的可能解决方案,有助于提出更多利用挖掘土和沉积物的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ASSESSMENT OF SPATIAL DATA OBTAINED BY MEANS OF THE USE OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) CHARACTERIZATION OF EARTH, LIME, AND GYPSUM MORTARS IN THE CONSTRUCTIONS OF THE 16TH, 17TH, AND 18TH CENTURIES LOGISTICS MODEL VS GOMPERTZ MODEL IN APPROXIMATION OF “S” CURVES IN WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS PROJECTS COMPARISON BETWEEN SMF AND SPSW STEEL BUILDING FOR MIXED-USE RESIDENCE USING THE AHP METHOD COMPARING THE WATER QUALITY OF STREAMS FEEDING A WATERSHED
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1