Taxonomy of design for deconstruction options to enable circular economy in buildings

IF 12.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Resources Environment and Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100153
Giulia Pristerà , Davide Tonini , Marco Lamperti Tornaghi , Dario Caro , Serenella Sala
{"title":"Taxonomy of design for deconstruction options to enable circular economy in buildings","authors":"Giulia Pristerà ,&nbsp;Davide Tonini ,&nbsp;Marco Lamperti Tornaghi ,&nbsp;Dario Caro ,&nbsp;Serenella Sala","doi":"10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The construction sector, due to its significant environmental impacts, is a focus area for the promotion of a shift towards the circular economy within the EU. A spotlight has been cast on the necessity to reduce construction and demolition waste and prioritise reuse and high-quality recycling. This work centres on selective demolition and design for deconstruction (DfD) as means of achieving these goals. A literature review is carried out, with the two-fold aim of assessing the state of the art in life cycle assessment studies on this topic and developing a taxonomy of applicable selective demolition and DfD solutions, framing it within the context of policy development in the EU. Available measures are identified for different building structural typologies (concrete, timber, masonry, steel), at the material and element level, providing a comprehensive overview of current and developing technologies. A taxonomy is proposed to support users in the identification of available measures and to link the effects thereof in terms of circularity. A literature-based quantitative assessment of current and potential reuse material rates is provided, together with the greenhouse gases (GHG) emission savings associated with reuse, in order to describe the present situation and highlight the potential for improvement. Reuse potential is found to vary between 0%–80%, depending on material and source; current European reuse rates are estimated &lt;15%. In terms of C-footprint, reuse appears beneficial in most cases. The additional GHG savings from reuse relative to alternative end-of-life options span from 1.30 (gypsum) to 5464 (expanded polystyrene) kg CO<sub>2-eq.</sub> per tonne of material managed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34479,"journal":{"name":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100153"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916124000069/pdfft?md5=d974fd32e559238ecae5dd354d711bc2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666916124000069-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916124000069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The construction sector, due to its significant environmental impacts, is a focus area for the promotion of a shift towards the circular economy within the EU. A spotlight has been cast on the necessity to reduce construction and demolition waste and prioritise reuse and high-quality recycling. This work centres on selective demolition and design for deconstruction (DfD) as means of achieving these goals. A literature review is carried out, with the two-fold aim of assessing the state of the art in life cycle assessment studies on this topic and developing a taxonomy of applicable selective demolition and DfD solutions, framing it within the context of policy development in the EU. Available measures are identified for different building structural typologies (concrete, timber, masonry, steel), at the material and element level, providing a comprehensive overview of current and developing technologies. A taxonomy is proposed to support users in the identification of available measures and to link the effects thereof in terms of circularity. A literature-based quantitative assessment of current and potential reuse material rates is provided, together with the greenhouse gases (GHG) emission savings associated with reuse, in order to describe the present situation and highlight the potential for improvement. Reuse potential is found to vary between 0%–80%, depending on material and source; current European reuse rates are estimated <15%. In terms of C-footprint, reuse appears beneficial in most cases. The additional GHG savings from reuse relative to alternative end-of-life options span from 1.30 (gypsum) to 5464 (expanded polystyrene) kg CO2-eq. per tonne of material managed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现建筑循环经济的解构设计方案分类法
由于对环境的重大影响,建筑行业是欧盟推动向循环经济转变的重点领域。减少建筑和拆除废物、优先考虑再利用和高质量回收利用的必要性已成为焦点。这项工作以选择性拆除和解构设计(DfD)为中心,将其作为实现这些目标的手段。我们进行了文献综述,目的有两个:一是评估有关该主题的生命周期评估研究的最新进展;二是根据欧盟的政策发展情况,对适用的选择性拆除和 DfD 解决方案进行分类。针对不同的建筑结构类型(混凝土、木材、砖石、钢材),在材料和元素层面确定了可用的措施,全面概述了当前和正在开发的技术。提出了一种分类法,以支持用户识别可用措施,并将其效果与循环性联系起来。对当前和潜在的材料再利用率以及与再利用相关的温室气体(GHG)减排量进行了基于文献的定量评估,以描述现状并强调改进的潜力。根据材料和来源的不同,重复利用的潜力介于 0%-80% 之间;目前欧洲的重复利用率估计为 15%。就碳足迹而言,再利用在大多数情况下都是有益的。相对于其他报废方案,再利用可额外减少的温室气体排放量从每吨材料管理 1.30(石膏)到 5464(发泡聚苯乙烯)千克二氧化碳当量不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Resources Environment and Sustainability Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
Household energy use and barriers in clean transition in the Tibetan Plateau Enhancing the performance of runoff prediction in data-scarce hydrological domains using advanced transfer learning Unveiling driving disparities between satisfaction and equity of ecosystem services in urbanized areas Unraveling the impact of global change on glomalin and implications for soil carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems Appropriately delayed flooding before rice transplanting increases net ecosystem economic benefit in the winter green manure-rice rotation system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1