Adherence to ketogenic dietary therapies in epilepsy: A systematic review of literature

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition Research Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.nutres.2024.03.009
Lenycia de Cassya Lopes Neri , Monica Guglielmetti , Simona Fiorini , Ludovica Pasca , Martina Paola Zanaboni , Valentina de Giorgis , Anna Tagliabue , Cinzia Ferraris
{"title":"Adherence to ketogenic dietary therapies in epilepsy: A systematic review of literature","authors":"Lenycia de Cassya Lopes Neri ,&nbsp;Monica Guglielmetti ,&nbsp;Simona Fiorini ,&nbsp;Ludovica Pasca ,&nbsp;Martina Paola Zanaboni ,&nbsp;Valentina de Giorgis ,&nbsp;Anna Tagliabue ,&nbsp;Cinzia Ferraris","doi":"10.1016/j.nutres.2024.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Treatment adherence, defined as the degree to which the patient actively follows the plan of care, is very difficult for subjects undergoing ketogenic dietary therapies (KDTs). This is a relevant issue because adherence to dietary therapies is considered 1 of the primary determinants of the treatment's success. This paper aimed to review the literature evidence about KDT adherence according to age and diagnosis of patients. Performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses method, this systematic review included clinical trials and observational studies. The risk of bias was assessed by the RoB 2.0 Cochrane tool and the quality of evidence according to the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool system. Twenty-two articles were included, with more than half (<em>n</em> = 12) having average quality (2–3 stars). The studies’ heterogeneity in measuring adherence and diagnosis made it difficult to compare results. Mean adherence rates were 71.5%, 66%, and 63.9% for children, adolescents, and adults, respectively. Adherence and compliance rates varied according to the follow-up period (79.7%, 66.7%, and 37.7% at 6, 24, and 36 months, respectively). The most frequent reasons for low adherence were linked to inefficacy in seizure control, adverse effects, food refusal, difficulty in preparing KDT meals or diet restrictiveness, lack of motivation, poor parental compliance, or cost of the diet. To conclude, there is a lack of standardized tools to measure adherence. Several studies highlighted the families’ challenges in adhering to KDTs. These factors should be considered when creating strategies and resources on family education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19245,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0271531724000411/pdfft?md5=775303646c85e538fbe40dce62d897d9&pid=1-s2.0-S0271531724000411-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0271531724000411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment adherence, defined as the degree to which the patient actively follows the plan of care, is very difficult for subjects undergoing ketogenic dietary therapies (KDTs). This is a relevant issue because adherence to dietary therapies is considered 1 of the primary determinants of the treatment's success. This paper aimed to review the literature evidence about KDT adherence according to age and diagnosis of patients. Performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses method, this systematic review included clinical trials and observational studies. The risk of bias was assessed by the RoB 2.0 Cochrane tool and the quality of evidence according to the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool system. Twenty-two articles were included, with more than half (n = 12) having average quality (2–3 stars). The studies’ heterogeneity in measuring adherence and diagnosis made it difficult to compare results. Mean adherence rates were 71.5%, 66%, and 63.9% for children, adolescents, and adults, respectively. Adherence and compliance rates varied according to the follow-up period (79.7%, 66.7%, and 37.7% at 6, 24, and 36 months, respectively). The most frequent reasons for low adherence were linked to inefficacy in seizure control, adverse effects, food refusal, difficulty in preparing KDT meals or diet restrictiveness, lack of motivation, poor parental compliance, or cost of the diet. To conclude, there is a lack of standardized tools to measure adherence. Several studies highlighted the families’ challenges in adhering to KDTs. These factors should be considered when creating strategies and resources on family education.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坚持生酮饮食疗法治疗癫痫:文献系统回顾
对于接受生酮饮食疗法(KDTs)的受试者来说,坚持治疗是非常困难的,因为坚持饮食疗法被认为是治疗成功的一个主要决定因素。这是一个相关问题,因为坚持饮食疗法被认为是治疗成功的主要决定因素之一。本文旨在根据患者的年龄和诊断情况,回顾有关 KDT 依从性的文献证据。本系统综述根据系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目方法进行,包括临床试验和观察性研究。采用 RoB 2.0 Cochrane 工具评估了偏倚风险,并根据混合方法评估工具系统评估了证据质量。共纳入 22 篇文章,其中一半以上(n = 12)的文章质量一般(2-3 星)。这些研究在衡量依从性和诊断方面存在异质性,因此很难对结果进行比较。儿童、青少年和成人的平均依从率分别为 71.5%、66% 和 63.9%。随访期不同,依从性和依从率也不同(6、24 和 36 个月的依从性和依从率分别为 79.7%、66.7% 和 37.7%)。依从性低的最常见原因与癫痫控制效果不佳、不良反应、拒绝进食、难以准备 KDT 餐或饮食限制、缺乏动力、父母依从性差或饮食成本有关。总之,目前还缺乏标准化的工具来衡量依从性。一些研究强调了家庭在坚持 KDT 方面所面临的挑战。在制定家庭教育策略和资源时,应考虑这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition Research
Nutrition Research 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.20%
发文量
107
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nutrition Research publishes original research articles, communications, and reviews on basic and applied nutrition. The mission of Nutrition Research is to serve as the journal for global communication of nutrition and life sciences research on diet and health. The field of nutrition sciences includes, but is not limited to, the study of nutrients during growth, reproduction, aging, health, and disease. Articles covering basic and applied research on all aspects of nutrition sciences are encouraged, including: nutritional biochemistry and metabolism; metabolomics, nutrient gene interactions; nutrient requirements for health; nutrition and disease; digestion and absorption; nutritional anthropology; epidemiology; the influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on nutrition of the individual and the community; the impact of nutrient intake on disease response and behavior; the consequences of nutritional deficiency on growth and development, endocrine and nervous systems, and immunity; nutrition and gut microbiota; food intolerance and allergy; nutrient drug interactions; nutrition and aging; nutrition and cancer; obesity; diabetes; and intervention programs.
期刊最新文献
Increasing particle size of oat flours decreases postprandial glycemia and increases appetite in healthy adults Editorial office and Board Members David Kritchevsky Graduate Student Award for Nutrition Research Higher sweet beverage consumption was associated with increased gestational weight gain and birth weight: A Chinese cohort study Supplementation of spermidine at 40 mg/day has minimal effects on circulating polyamines: An exploratory double-blind randomized controlled trial in older men
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1