SDG LENS TO ASSESS INTERDISCIPLINARY SUSTAINABLE DESIGNS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS

Miguel Andrés Andrés Guerra, Holbeein Velásquez, Estefanía Cervantes
{"title":"SDG LENS TO ASSESS INTERDISCIPLINARY SUSTAINABLE DESIGNS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS","authors":"Miguel Andrés Andrés Guerra, Holbeein Velásquez, Estefanía Cervantes","doi":"10.14455/isec.2024.11(1).epe-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interdisciplinary and sustainable solutions are the long-awaited response to the multifaceted problems of the contemporary world. Multiple investigations suggest that the interaction of the medley of disciplines promotes sustainability thanks to its solutions, since there is a direct relationship between the interdisciplinary level of the team and the impact that the proposed solution and its development will have. The qualitative approach of this article helps to better understand the importance of developing interdisciplinary teams in sustainable solutions that compete with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Two different sustainable design proposals are examined and compared. Both designs specifically address SDGs 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 17. The results allude to the fact that interdisciplinary designs promote and maximize sustainability in multiple SDGs through the same solutions, making it a more efficient design with a greater impact on society and the world. The significance of this research and the practice of it will focus on understanding the individual contributions of each disciplinary member and their different observations in their area of study.","PeriodicalId":477265,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction","volume":"86 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14455/isec.2024.11(1).epe-09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interdisciplinary and sustainable solutions are the long-awaited response to the multifaceted problems of the contemporary world. Multiple investigations suggest that the interaction of the medley of disciplines promotes sustainability thanks to its solutions, since there is a direct relationship between the interdisciplinary level of the team and the impact that the proposed solution and its development will have. The qualitative approach of this article helps to better understand the importance of developing interdisciplinary teams in sustainable solutions that compete with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Two different sustainable design proposals are examined and compared. Both designs specifically address SDGs 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 17. The results allude to the fact that interdisciplinary designs promote and maximize sustainability in multiple SDGs through the same solutions, making it a more efficient design with a greater impact on society and the world. The significance of this research and the practice of it will focus on understanding the individual contributions of each disciplinary member and their different observations in their area of study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从可持续发展全球视角评估基础设施系统的跨学科可持续设计
跨学科和可持续的解决方案是对当今世界多方面问题期待已久的回应。多项调查表明,混合学科的互动能通过其解决方案促进可持续性,因为团队的跨学科水平与拟议解决方案及其发展所产生的影响之间存在直接关系。本文采用的定性方法有助于更好地理解在与可持续发展目标(SDGs)竞争的可持续解决方案中发展跨学科团队的重要性。本文对两个不同的可持续设计方案进行了研究和比较。这两个设计都特别针对可持续发展目标 3、7、8、9、10、11、12、13 和 17。研究结果表明,跨学科设计通过相同的解决方案促进并最大限度地实现多个可持续发展目标中的可持续性,使其成为对社会和世界产生更大影响的更高效的设计。这项研究和实践的意义将集中于了解每个学科成员的个人贡献以及他们在各自研究领域的不同观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ASSESSMENT OF SPATIAL DATA OBTAINED BY MEANS OF THE USE OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) CHARACTERIZATION OF EARTH, LIME, AND GYPSUM MORTARS IN THE CONSTRUCTIONS OF THE 16TH, 17TH, AND 18TH CENTURIES LOGISTICS MODEL VS GOMPERTZ MODEL IN APPROXIMATION OF “S” CURVES IN WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS PROJECTS COMPARISON BETWEEN SMF AND SPSW STEEL BUILDING FOR MIXED-USE RESIDENCE USING THE AHP METHOD COMPARING THE WATER QUALITY OF STREAMS FEEDING A WATERSHED
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1