Evaluation of the accuracy of a UWB tracker for in-home positioning for older adults

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Medical Engineering & Physics Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104155
Linna Qian , Andrew Chan , Joanne Cai , Justin Lewicke , Geoff Gregson , Michael Lipsett , Adriana Rios Rincón
{"title":"Evaluation of the accuracy of a UWB tracker for in-home positioning for older adults","authors":"Linna Qian ,&nbsp;Andrew Chan ,&nbsp;Joanne Cai ,&nbsp;Justin Lewicke ,&nbsp;Geoff Gregson ,&nbsp;Michael Lipsett ,&nbsp;Adriana Rios Rincón","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The population of older adults is rapidly growing. In-home monitoring systems have been used to support aging-in-place. Ambient sensors or wearable localizers can be used but may be too low resolution, while camera systems are invasive to privacy. Ultra-wideband (UWB) localization offers precise positioning by placing anchors throughout the house and wearing a tag that is tracked by the anchors. In this study, the accuracy of UWB for indoor tracking was evaluated in a motion capture gait lab and in a mock condo in the Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital. First, the configuration of UWB was tested, changing factors related to sampling time, anchor placement and line-of-sight. Comparing these factors to the configurations recommended by the manufacturer guidelines, accuracies remained within 14 cm. We then performed static and dynamic accuracy tests, with dynamic testing comprised of rolling and walking motions. In the motion capture lab, we found localization accuracies of 7.0 ± 11.1 cm while in the mock condo, we found accuracies of 27.3 ± 12.9 cm. Dynamic testing with rolling motions had an average of 19.1 ± 1.6 cm while walking was 20.5 ± 4.2 cm. The mean accuracy of UWB is within the 30 cm target for indoor localization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324000560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The population of older adults is rapidly growing. In-home monitoring systems have been used to support aging-in-place. Ambient sensors or wearable localizers can be used but may be too low resolution, while camera systems are invasive to privacy. Ultra-wideband (UWB) localization offers precise positioning by placing anchors throughout the house and wearing a tag that is tracked by the anchors. In this study, the accuracy of UWB for indoor tracking was evaluated in a motion capture gait lab and in a mock condo in the Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital. First, the configuration of UWB was tested, changing factors related to sampling time, anchor placement and line-of-sight. Comparing these factors to the configurations recommended by the manufacturer guidelines, accuracies remained within 14 cm. We then performed static and dynamic accuracy tests, with dynamic testing comprised of rolling and walking motions. In the motion capture lab, we found localization accuracies of 7.0 ± 11.1 cm while in the mock condo, we found accuracies of 27.3 ± 12.9 cm. Dynamic testing with rolling motions had an average of 19.1 ± 1.6 cm while walking was 20.5 ± 4.2 cm. The mean accuracy of UWB is within the 30 cm target for indoor localization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估用于老年人居家定位的 UWB 跟踪器的准确性
老年人口正在迅速增长。居家监控系统已被用于支持居家养老。可以使用环境传感器或可穿戴定位器,但分辨率可能太低,而摄像系统则会侵犯隐私。超宽带(UWB)定位通过在房屋各处放置锚点和佩戴由锚点跟踪的标签来提供精确定位。本研究在格伦罗斯康复医院的运动捕捉步态实验室和模拟公寓中评估了超宽带室内跟踪的准确性。首先,测试了 UWB 的配置,改变了与采样时间、锚位置和视线相关的因素。将这些因素与制造商指南推荐的配置进行比较后,准确度保持在 14 厘米以内。然后,我们进行了静态和动态精度测试,动态测试包括滚动和行走运动。在动作捕捉实验室中,我们发现定位精度为 7.0 ± 11.1 厘米,而在模拟公寓中,我们发现定位精度为 27.3 ± 12.9 厘米。滚动运动动态测试的平均精确度为 19.1 ± 1.6 厘米,而步行测试的平均精确度为 20.5 ± 4.2 厘米。UWB 的平均精确度在室内定位的 30 厘米目标范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Engineering & Physics
Medical Engineering & Physics 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS) using echo amplitudes of the therapeutic focused transducer 3D bioheat transfer mapping reveals nanomagnetic particles effectiveness in radiofrequency hyperthermia breast cancer treatment comparing to experimental study Bone ingrowth in randomly distributed porous interbody cage during lumbar spinal fusion A method of nucleus image segmentation and counting based on TC-UNet++ and distance watershed Integrated analysis of clinical indicators and mechanical properties in cancellous bone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1