Exploring the impact of computer-mediated emotional interactions on human facial and physiological responses

Nastaran Saffaryazdi , Nikita Kirkcaldy , Gun Lee , Kate Loveys , Elizabeth Broadbent , Mark Billinghurst
{"title":"Exploring the impact of computer-mediated emotional interactions on human facial and physiological responses","authors":"Nastaran Saffaryazdi ,&nbsp;Nikita Kirkcaldy ,&nbsp;Gun Lee ,&nbsp;Kate Loveys ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Broadbent ,&nbsp;Mark Billinghurst","doi":"10.1016/j.teler.2024.100131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Remote communication has become pervasive, yet its impact on human emotions, empathy, and physiological responses remains unclear. This study addresses this gap by investigating how emotional video-mediated conversations differ from face-to-face interactions, focusing on behavioral and physiological responses. We create a multimodal dataset of Electrodermal Activity (EDA) signals, Photoplethysmography (PPG) signals, and facial videos from two people conversing about emotional topics in face-to-face and remote video-mediated conditions. We use a series of repeated measures ANOVA with aligned rank transform to compare face-to-face to remote conversation in terms of heart rate activity, electrodermal activity, and facial action units. We also explore how subjective empathy between people varies in these two conditions. Our findings reveal significant differences in physiological responses between face-to-face and remote conversation and variations in perceived empathy based on interaction setting, highlighting the nuanced influence of communication channels. We also show that we can recognize emotions more accurately when we pre-train a random forest classifier with one condition’s data (an increase of 20% to 45% for various modalities). Finally, we discuss the research findings and limitations and offer insights for optimizing human–computer interaction and understanding human emotional responses in an increasingly tech-mediated world.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101213,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics Reports","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503024000173/pdfft?md5=515cec607dad2682767200b6724b6187&pid=1-s2.0-S2772503024000173-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503024000173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote communication has become pervasive, yet its impact on human emotions, empathy, and physiological responses remains unclear. This study addresses this gap by investigating how emotional video-mediated conversations differ from face-to-face interactions, focusing on behavioral and physiological responses. We create a multimodal dataset of Electrodermal Activity (EDA) signals, Photoplethysmography (PPG) signals, and facial videos from two people conversing about emotional topics in face-to-face and remote video-mediated conditions. We use a series of repeated measures ANOVA with aligned rank transform to compare face-to-face to remote conversation in terms of heart rate activity, electrodermal activity, and facial action units. We also explore how subjective empathy between people varies in these two conditions. Our findings reveal significant differences in physiological responses between face-to-face and remote conversation and variations in perceived empathy based on interaction setting, highlighting the nuanced influence of communication channels. We also show that we can recognize emotions more accurately when we pre-train a random forest classifier with one condition’s data (an increase of 20% to 45% for various modalities). Finally, we discuss the research findings and limitations and offer insights for optimizing human–computer interaction and understanding human emotional responses in an increasingly tech-mediated world.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索以计算机为媒介的情感互动对人类面部和生理反应的影响
远程通信已变得无处不在,但它对人类情感、移情和生理反应的影响仍不清楚。本研究针对这一空白,研究了以视频为媒介的情感对话与面对面互动的不同之处,重点关注行为和生理反应。我们创建了一个多模态数据集,其中包括在面对面和远程视频媒介条件下两个人就情感话题进行对话时的皮电活动(EDA)信号、光电压力计(PPG)信号和面部视频。我们使用一系列重复测量方差分析和对齐秩变换,从心率活动、皮电活动和面部动作单元方面对面对面交谈和远程交谈进行比较。我们还探讨了在这两种情况下人与人之间的主观共鸣是如何变化的。我们的研究结果表明,面对面交谈和远程交谈之间的生理反应存在显著差异,而感知到的共鸣也会因互动环境的不同而不同,这凸显了交流渠道的细微影响。我们的研究还表明,当我们用一种情况的数据预先训练随机森林分类器时,我们可以更准确地识别情绪(各种模式的识别率提高了 20% 到 45%)。最后,我们讨论了研究结果和局限性,并为优化人机交互和理解人类在日益以技术为媒介的世界中的情绪反应提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A review on the use of immersive technology in space research Model to explain use of E-Government service change ALZENET: Deep learning-based early prediction of Alzheimer's disease through magnetic resonance imaging analysis The mediating role of attitude towards the technology in shaping artificial intelligence usage among professionals Research on smart city construction in the context of public culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1