Locating Former Nazi Terror Sites: A Methodological 'How-To' for Archaeological Research and Heritage Management

Q2 Arts and Humanities Internet Archaeology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.11141/ia.66.11
Barbara Hausmair, Attila Dézsi
{"title":"Locating Former Nazi Terror Sites: A Methodological 'How-To' for Archaeological Research and Heritage Management","authors":"Barbara Hausmair, Attila Dézsi","doi":"10.11141/ia.66.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1980s, there have been increasing efforts by heritage offices in Germany and Austria, and many of the countries that were occupied by Nazi Germany during World War II, to locate places of former Nazi terror and, where possible, to protect them from further destruction in order to preserve them as places of remembrance for the victims of National Socialism. However, methodological considerations and approaches for locating, recording, and eventually assessing the 'heritage value' of former Nazi terror sites remain rather obscure, since little has been published on the methodological approaches taken by different institutions. This article presents a systematic workflow for recording former sites of Nazi terror, which was developed in the framework of the Natzweiler-Concentration-Camp-System-Project based at the Heritage Office of the State of Baden-Württemberg (Landesamt für Denkmalpflege im Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart). It aims to provide a methodological 'How-To' for creating archaeological inventories of former Nazi camps, associated sites and whole 'landscapes of destruction', hints at where to locate useful primary sources, but also to critically reflect on challenges encountered during the project and how they could be approached in the future.","PeriodicalId":38724,"journal":{"name":"Internet Archaeology","volume":"36 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.66.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since the 1980s, there have been increasing efforts by heritage offices in Germany and Austria, and many of the countries that were occupied by Nazi Germany during World War II, to locate places of former Nazi terror and, where possible, to protect them from further destruction in order to preserve them as places of remembrance for the victims of National Socialism. However, methodological considerations and approaches for locating, recording, and eventually assessing the 'heritage value' of former Nazi terror sites remain rather obscure, since little has been published on the methodological approaches taken by different institutions. This article presents a systematic workflow for recording former sites of Nazi terror, which was developed in the framework of the Natzweiler-Concentration-Camp-System-Project based at the Heritage Office of the State of Baden-Württemberg (Landesamt für Denkmalpflege im Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart). It aims to provide a methodological 'How-To' for creating archaeological inventories of former Nazi camps, associated sites and whole 'landscapes of destruction', hints at where to locate useful primary sources, but also to critically reflect on challenges encountered during the project and how they could be approached in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定前纳粹恐怖遗址的位置:考古研究和遗产管理的方法论 "指南
自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,德国和奥地利以及二战期间被纳粹德国占领的许多国家的遗 产管理部门越来越多地努力寻找前纳粹恐怖遗址,并在可能的情况下保护这些遗址免遭进 一步破坏,以便将其作为国家社会主义受害者的纪念场所加以保护。然而,对前纳粹恐怖遗址进行定位、记录并最终评估其 "遗产价值 "的方法论考虑因素和方法仍然相当模糊,因为关于不同机构所采用的方法论方法的出版物很少。本文介绍了记录前纳粹恐怖遗址的系统工作流程,该流程是在巴登-符腾堡州遗产办公室(Landesamt für Denkmalpflege im Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart)的纳茨魏勒集中营系统项目框架内开发的。该项目旨在为编制前纳粹集中营、相关遗址和整个 "毁灭景观 "的考古清单提供方法论上的 "如何做",提示在哪里可以找到有用的原始资料,同时对项目中遇到的挑战以及今后如何应对这些挑战进行批判性思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Archaeology
Internet Archaeology Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Open Archaeology, Open Source? Collaborative practices in an emerging community of archaeological software engineers The Ashwell Project: creating an online geospatial community Digitally Enlightened or Still in the Dark? Establishing a Sector-Wide Approach to Enhancing Data Synthesis and Research Potential in British Environmental Archaeology and Beyond 'All this in their ignorance they called civilisation': Analysing the Relationship between Nationalism and the Display of Roman Archaeology in Britain's National Museums Excavations at the Late Bronze Age site of Erimi-Pitharka, Cyprus (2022-2023 seasons): Regional production and storage in the Kouris Valley
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1