True and false memories for spatial location evoke more similar patterns of brain activity in males than females.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Memory Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1080/09658211.2024.2333505
Dylan S Spets, Jessica M Karanian, Scott D Slotnick
{"title":"True and false memories for spatial location evoke more similar patterns of brain activity in males than females.","authors":"Dylan S Spets, Jessica M Karanian, Scott D Slotnick","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2024.2333505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>True and false memories recruit a number of shared brain regions; however, they are not completely overlapping. Extensive sex differences have been identified in the brain during true memories and, recently, we identified sex differences in the brain during false memories. In the current fMRI study, we sought to determine whether sex differences existed in the location and extent of overlap between true and false memories. True and false memories activated a number of shared brain regions. Compared to females, males produced a greater number of overlapping brain regions (8 versus 2 activations for males and females, respectively) including the prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, and early/late visual processing cortices (including V1) in males and prefrontal and parietal cortices in females. Males had significantly higher similarity between true and false memory activation maps, revealed by our novel multi-voxel pattern correlation analysis. Moreover, higher similarity between true and false memory activation maps was associated with higher false memory rates. The current results suggest that true and false memories are more similar in males than females. The significant brain-behavior relationship also suggests that males may be more susceptible to false memory errors due to their highly similar true memory-false memory cortical representations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":" ","pages":"1349-1357"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2024.2333505","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

True and false memories recruit a number of shared brain regions; however, they are not completely overlapping. Extensive sex differences have been identified in the brain during true memories and, recently, we identified sex differences in the brain during false memories. In the current fMRI study, we sought to determine whether sex differences existed in the location and extent of overlap between true and false memories. True and false memories activated a number of shared brain regions. Compared to females, males produced a greater number of overlapping brain regions (8 versus 2 activations for males and females, respectively) including the prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, and early/late visual processing cortices (including V1) in males and prefrontal and parietal cortices in females. Males had significantly higher similarity between true and false memory activation maps, revealed by our novel multi-voxel pattern correlation analysis. Moreover, higher similarity between true and false memory activation maps was associated with higher false memory rates. The current results suggest that true and false memories are more similar in males than females. The significant brain-behavior relationship also suggests that males may be more susceptible to false memory errors due to their highly similar true memory-false memory cortical representations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与女性相比,男性对空间位置的真假记忆会唤起更相似的大脑活动模式。
真实记忆和虚假记忆需要使用一些共同的大脑区域,但它们并不完全重叠。在真实记忆过程中,我们发现大脑存在广泛的性别差异;最近,我们又发现在虚假记忆过程中,大脑也存在性别差异。在当前的 fMRI 研究中,我们试图确定真假记忆重叠的位置和程度是否存在性别差异。真假记忆激活了许多共同的大脑区域。与女性相比,男性产生了更多的重叠脑区(男性和女性分别为8个和2个),包括男性的前额叶皮层、顶叶皮层和早期/晚期视觉处理皮层(包括V1),以及女性的前额叶和顶叶皮层。我们的新型多象素模式相关分析表明,男性的真假记忆激活图之间的相似性明显更高。此外,真假记忆激活图的相似性越高,错误记忆率也越高。目前的研究结果表明,与女性相比,男性的真假记忆更为相似。大脑与行为之间的重要关系还表明,由于男性的真实记忆-虚假记忆皮层表征高度相似,他们可能更容易出现虚假记忆错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Memory
Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.
期刊最新文献
The influence of acute alcohol intoxication and hair visibility on delayed face recall. The contamination effect on recognition memory: adding evidence of an adaptive mnemonic tuning. Chronology versus centrality: uncovering age-related differences in order effects during the retrieval of autobiographical memories. Cultural life scripts as schema: recalling schema congruent and incongruent events from a hypothetical life story. Embracing strengths and avoiding weaknesses: a meta-analysis of the mnemic neglect effect.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1