Can Infants Retain Statistically Segmented Words and Mappings Across a Delay?

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1111/cogs.13433
Ferhat Karaman, Jill Lany, Jessica F. Hay
{"title":"Can Infants Retain Statistically Segmented Words and Mappings Across a Delay?","authors":"Ferhat Karaman,&nbsp;Jill Lany,&nbsp;Jessica F. Hay","doi":"10.1111/cogs.13433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Infants are sensitive to statistics in spoken language that aid word-form segmentation and immediate mapping to referents. However, it is not clear whether this sensitivity influences the formation and retention of word-referent mappings across a delay, two real-world challenges that learners must overcome. We tested how the timing of referent training, relative to familiarization with transitional probabilities (TPs) in speech, impacts English-learning 23-month-olds’ ability to form and retain word-referent mappings. In Experiment 1, we tested infants’ ability to retain TP information across a 10-min delay and use it in the service of word learning. Infants successfully mapped high-TP but not low-TP words to referents. In Experiment 2, infants readily mapped the same words even when they were unfamiliar. In Experiment 3, high- and low-TP word-referent mappings were trained immediately after familiarization, and infants readily remembered these associations 10 min later. In sum, although 23-month-old infants do not need strong statistics to map word forms to referents immediately, or to remember those mappings across a delay, infants are nevertheless sensitive to these statistics in the speech stream, and they influence mapping after a delay. These findings suggest that, by 23 months of age, sensitivity to statistics in speech may impact infants’ language development by leading word forms with low coherence to be poorly mapped following even a short period of consolidation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"48 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.13433","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infants are sensitive to statistics in spoken language that aid word-form segmentation and immediate mapping to referents. However, it is not clear whether this sensitivity influences the formation and retention of word-referent mappings across a delay, two real-world challenges that learners must overcome. We tested how the timing of referent training, relative to familiarization with transitional probabilities (TPs) in speech, impacts English-learning 23-month-olds’ ability to form and retain word-referent mappings. In Experiment 1, we tested infants’ ability to retain TP information across a 10-min delay and use it in the service of word learning. Infants successfully mapped high-TP but not low-TP words to referents. In Experiment 2, infants readily mapped the same words even when they were unfamiliar. In Experiment 3, high- and low-TP word-referent mappings were trained immediately after familiarization, and infants readily remembered these associations 10 min later. In sum, although 23-month-old infants do not need strong statistics to map word forms to referents immediately, or to remember those mappings across a delay, infants are nevertheless sensitive to these statistics in the speech stream, and they influence mapping after a delay. These findings suggest that, by 23 months of age, sensitivity to statistics in speech may impact infants’ language development by leading word forms with low coherence to be poorly mapped following even a short period of consolidation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婴儿能否跨越延迟保留统计分段的单词和映射?
婴儿对口语中有助于词形分割和立即映射到参照物的统计数据非常敏感。然而,这种敏感性是否会影响单词-参照物映射的形成和延迟保留,目前尚不清楚,而这正是学习者必须克服的两个现实挑战。我们测试了相对于熟悉语音中的过渡概率(TPs)而言,指代训练的时机如何影响 23 个月大的英语学习者形成和保持单词-指代映射的能力。在实验 1 中,我们测试了婴儿在延迟 10 分钟后保留 TP 信息并将其用于单词学习的能力。婴儿成功地将高TP词(而非低TP词)映射到了参照物上。在实验 2 中,即使是不熟悉的词,婴儿也能很容易地将其与相同的词对应起来。在实验 3 中,高词性和低词性单词与参照物的映射在熟悉后立即进行了训练,10 分钟后婴儿很容易记住这些联想。总之,虽然 23 个月大的婴儿不需要强大的统计量就能立即将词形映射到参照物上,也不需要在延迟后记住这些映射,但婴儿对语流中的这些统计量很敏感,它们会在延迟后影响映射。这些研究结果表明,到 23 个月大时,对语音中统计信息的敏感性可能会影响婴儿的语言发展,导致连贯性较低的词形在经过短时间的巩固后也不能很好地映射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Science
Cognitive Science PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Cognitive Science publishes articles in all areas of cognitive science, covering such topics as knowledge representation, inference, memory processes, learning, problem solving, planning, perception, natural language understanding, connectionism, brain theory, motor control, intentional systems, and other areas of interdisciplinary concern. Highest priority is given to research reports that are specifically written for a multidisciplinary audience. The audience is primarily researchers in cognitive science and its associated fields, including anthropologists, education researchers, psychologists, philosophers, linguists, computer scientists, neuroscientists, and roboticists.
期刊最新文献
ACKNOWLEDGING THE GAP WHILE BRIDGING IT: The Experimental Versus Theoretical Divide on the Cognitive Science Study of Language Do You Control Your Unconscious Action Impulses? Composition as Nonlinear Combination in Semantic Space: A Computational Characterization of Compound Processing The Less Meaningful the Understanding, the Faster the Feeling: Speech Comprehension Changes Perceptual Speech Tempo Virtual Partners Improve Synchronization in Human−Machine Trios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1