Do You Control Your Unconscious Action Impulses?

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1111/cogs.70041
Yongchun Wang, Mingxiang Li, Meng Zou, Yunfei Gao, Jinlan Cao, Zhengqi Tang, Yonghui Wang
{"title":"Do You Control Your Unconscious Action Impulses?","authors":"Yongchun Wang,&nbsp;Mingxiang Li,&nbsp;Meng Zou,&nbsp;Yunfei Gao,&nbsp;Jinlan Cao,&nbsp;Zhengqi Tang,&nbsp;Yonghui Wang","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A crucial aspect of self-control is the voluntary inhibition of impulsive actions. Stimuli can elicit impulses (or preparation) to act not only in the presence but also in the absence of perceptual awareness, but whether people control action impulses elicited by unconscious stimuli remains unclear. This study used a masked prime version of the Go/NoGo/Free task and combined mathematical modeling of behavioral data to investigate whether people control the unconscious action impulses. In the experiment, when the subliminal prime stimulus triggers the unconscious action impulse, participants need to freely decide whether or not to perform the action. The results showed that the no-response rate was higher in Go-prime free-choice trials than in NoGo-prime free-choice trials, and there were marginally larger negative drift rates in the former than in the latter. The results suggest that people are more likely to make inhibitory decisions about unconscious action impulses. This finding provides support for a framework that extends the feedback loop model of intentional inhibition.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"49 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.70041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A crucial aspect of self-control is the voluntary inhibition of impulsive actions. Stimuli can elicit impulses (or preparation) to act not only in the presence but also in the absence of perceptual awareness, but whether people control action impulses elicited by unconscious stimuli remains unclear. This study used a masked prime version of the Go/NoGo/Free task and combined mathematical modeling of behavioral data to investigate whether people control the unconscious action impulses. In the experiment, when the subliminal prime stimulus triggers the unconscious action impulse, participants need to freely decide whether or not to perform the action. The results showed that the no-response rate was higher in Go-prime free-choice trials than in NoGo-prime free-choice trials, and there were marginally larger negative drift rates in the former than in the latter. The results suggest that people are more likely to make inhibitory decisions about unconscious action impulses. This finding provides support for a framework that extends the feedback loop model of intentional inhibition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我控制的一个重要方面是自愿抑制冲动行为。刺激不仅可以在有知觉意识的情况下引起行动冲动(或准备),也可以在没有知觉意识的情况下引起行动冲动,但人们是否能控制由无意识刺激引起的行动冲动仍不清楚。本研究使用了Go/NoGo/Free任务的遮蔽素材版本,并结合行为数据的数学建模来研究人们是否能控制无意识的行动冲动。在实验中,当潜意识素描刺激触发无意识行动冲动时,参与者需要自由决定是否执行该行动。结果显示,Go-prime 自由选择试验中的无反应率高于No-Go-prime 自由选择试验,前者的负漂移率略大于后者。结果表明,人们更有可能对无意识的行动冲动做出抑制性决定。这一发现为扩展有意抑制的反馈回路模型框架提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Science
Cognitive Science PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Cognitive Science publishes articles in all areas of cognitive science, covering such topics as knowledge representation, inference, memory processes, learning, problem solving, planning, perception, natural language understanding, connectionism, brain theory, motor control, intentional systems, and other areas of interdisciplinary concern. Highest priority is given to research reports that are specifically written for a multidisciplinary audience. The audience is primarily researchers in cognitive science and its associated fields, including anthropologists, education researchers, psychologists, philosophers, linguists, computer scientists, neuroscientists, and roboticists.
期刊最新文献
ACKNOWLEDGING THE GAP WHILE BRIDGING IT: The Experimental Versus Theoretical Divide on the Cognitive Science Study of Language Do You Control Your Unconscious Action Impulses? Composition as Nonlinear Combination in Semantic Space: A Computational Characterization of Compound Processing The Less Meaningful the Understanding, the Faster the Feeling: Speech Comprehension Changes Perceptual Speech Tempo Virtual Partners Improve Synchronization in Human−Machine Trios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1