Gut Microbiota and Symptom Expression and Severity in Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

Biological research for nursing Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1177/10998004241242102
Stephanie Sealschott, Rita Pickler, Christine Fortney, Michael Bailey, Brett Loman
{"title":"Gut Microbiota and Symptom Expression and Severity in Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.","authors":"Stephanie Sealschott, Rita Pickler, Christine Fortney, Michael Bailey, Brett Loman","doi":"10.1177/10998004241242102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Problem:</b> Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) affecting neonates with fetal exposure to opioids, is defined by expression and severity of symptoms. The pathophysiology behind symptoms variability is lacking. The study aims were to examine (a) differences in gut microbiota of neonates with and without NAS, (b) the relationships between gut microbiota and symptom expression and NAS severity, and (c) the changes in the neonate gut microbiota diversity during the course of NAS treatment. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional observational design was used to examine differences in microbiota and a longitudinal, repeated measures approach was used to determine relationships between gut microbiota and NAS symptoms. Symptom data were collected using the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring Tool and the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale. Stool samples were collected for microbiome analyses with 16S rRNA microbiome sequencing. <b>Results:</b> Differences in alpha and beta diversity between neonates with and without NAS were seen. Relative abundance results revealed 18 taxa were different in neonates with NAS compared to neonates without NAS. No differences were found in alpha or beta diversity in neonates with NAS between enrollment and hospital discharge. There was increased abundance of <i>Escherichia-Shigella</i> and <i>Bacteriodes</i> genera related to higher symptom scores. <b>Discussion:</b> Differences in alpha and beta diversity between neonates with and without NAS may be due to differences in birth mode and type of feeding. The findings of specific increased bacteria related to increased symptoms in the neonates with NAS may also be influenced by birth mode and type of feeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":93901,"journal":{"name":"Biological research for nursing","volume":" ","pages":"460-468"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological research for nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004241242102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem: Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) affecting neonates with fetal exposure to opioids, is defined by expression and severity of symptoms. The pathophysiology behind symptoms variability is lacking. The study aims were to examine (a) differences in gut microbiota of neonates with and without NAS, (b) the relationships between gut microbiota and symptom expression and NAS severity, and (c) the changes in the neonate gut microbiota diversity during the course of NAS treatment. Methods: A cross-sectional observational design was used to examine differences in microbiota and a longitudinal, repeated measures approach was used to determine relationships between gut microbiota and NAS symptoms. Symptom data were collected using the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring Tool and the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale. Stool samples were collected for microbiome analyses with 16S rRNA microbiome sequencing. Results: Differences in alpha and beta diversity between neonates with and without NAS were seen. Relative abundance results revealed 18 taxa were different in neonates with NAS compared to neonates without NAS. No differences were found in alpha or beta diversity in neonates with NAS between enrollment and hospital discharge. There was increased abundance of Escherichia-Shigella and Bacteriodes genera related to higher symptom scores. Discussion: Differences in alpha and beta diversity between neonates with and without NAS may be due to differences in birth mode and type of feeding. The findings of specific increased bacteria related to increased symptoms in the neonates with NAS may also be influenced by birth mode and type of feeding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肠道微生物群与新生儿戒断综合征的症状表现和严重程度。
问题:新生儿禁欲综合征(NAS)影响胎儿暴露于阿片类药物的新生儿,根据症状的表现和严重程度来定义。目前尚缺乏症状变化背后的病理生理学。本研究旨在探讨:(a) 患有和未患 NAS 的新生儿肠道微生物群的差异;(b) 肠道微生物群与症状表现和 NAS 严重程度之间的关系;(c) 在治疗 NAS 的过程中新生儿肠道微生物群多样性的变化。研究方法采用横断面观察设计研究微生物群的差异,采用纵向重复测量方法确定肠道微生物群与 NAS 症状之间的关系。使用芬尼根新生儿戒断评分工具和新生儿疼痛躁动与镇静量表收集症状数据。收集的粪便样本通过 16S rRNA 微生物组测序进行微生物组分析。结果患有和未患有 NAS 的新生儿在 alpha 和 beta 多样性方面存在差异。相对丰度结果显示,与未患 NAS 的新生儿相比,患 NAS 的新生儿中有 18 个分类群不同。患有 NAS 的新生儿在入院和出院期间的阿尔法和贝塔多样性均无差异。埃希氏菌属(Escherichia-Shigella)和杆菌属(Bacteriodes)的丰度增加与症状评分较高有关。讨论:患有和未患有 NAS 的新生儿在阿尔法和贝塔多样性方面的差异可能是由于出生方式和喂养类型的不同造成的。在患有 NAS 的新生儿中,与症状增加有关的特定细菌增加的发现也可能受到出生方式和喂养类型的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association Between Serum Albumin and the Length of Hospital Stay Among Patients With Acute Heart Failure. L-Shaped Associations Between Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index and Hearing Loss: A Cross-Sectional Study From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The Effects of Aquatic Exercise Training on Functional and Hemodynamic Responses in Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Melatonin in Human Milk: A Scoping Review. Plant-Based Diets and Cardiovascular Disease in Older Adults: An Integrative Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1