Is there hyper-raising in European Portuguese?

IF 0.3 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Probus Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1515/probus-2024-2005
Anabela Gonçalves, Madalena Colaço
{"title":"Is there hyper-raising in European Portuguese?","authors":"Anabela Gonçalves, Madalena Colaço","doi":"10.1515/probus-2024-2005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several languages allow for hyper-raising, a structure in which a DP that is interpreted as the subject of a finite complement clause is spelled-out as the subject of the matrix clause. Hyper-raising challenges certain core concepts of syntactic theory related to movement and locality. Various proposals have been made for analysing these structures, the main difference being whether the final position of the DP results from movement or not. It has often been assumed that European Portuguese, in contrast to Brazilian Portuguese, does not allow hyper-raising, or only allows it in very limited contexts. In this paper, we present empirical data extracted from written corpora and experimental results attesting to the production and acceptance of hyper-raising structures by a number of native speakers of European Portuguese. We contribute to identifying the contexts that favour hyper-raising in this variety and outline a preliminary analysis to explain what leads these speakers to produce and accept hyper-raising, while many others systematically reject it. In our proposal, this difference results from the properties of the embedded functional heads T and C, and the way in which their formal features are checked. Specifically, we propose that those speakers dissociate Case features from person-number features.","PeriodicalId":45039,"journal":{"name":"Probus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probus","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2024-2005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several languages allow for hyper-raising, a structure in which a DP that is interpreted as the subject of a finite complement clause is spelled-out as the subject of the matrix clause. Hyper-raising challenges certain core concepts of syntactic theory related to movement and locality. Various proposals have been made for analysing these structures, the main difference being whether the final position of the DP results from movement or not. It has often been assumed that European Portuguese, in contrast to Brazilian Portuguese, does not allow hyper-raising, or only allows it in very limited contexts. In this paper, we present empirical data extracted from written corpora and experimental results attesting to the production and acceptance of hyper-raising structures by a number of native speakers of European Portuguese. We contribute to identifying the contexts that favour hyper-raising in this variety and outline a preliminary analysis to explain what leads these speakers to produce and accept hyper-raising, while many others systematically reject it. In our proposal, this difference results from the properties of the embedded functional heads T and C, and the way in which their formal features are checked. Specifically, we propose that those speakers dissociate Case features from person-number features.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲葡萄牙语是否存在过度提高?
有几种语言允许超提升,在这种结构中,被解释为有限补语从句主语的 DP 被拼写为矩阵从句的主语。超提升结构对句法理论中与移动和位置相关的某些核心概念提出了挑战。人们为分析这些结构提出了各种建议,主要区别在于 DP 的最终位置是否因移动而产生。人们通常认为,与巴西葡萄牙语相比,欧洲葡萄牙语不允许超提升,或者只允许在非常有限的语境中使用超提升。在本文中,我们介绍了从书面语料中提取的实证数据,以及一些以欧洲葡萄牙语为母语的人产生和接受超提升结构的实验结果。我们有助于确定该语种中有利于超提升的语境,并概述了一项初步分析,以解释是什么导致这些母语葡萄牙语者产生并接受超提升,而其他许多母语葡萄牙语者则系统地拒绝超提升。根据我们的建议,这种差异源于嵌入功能词头 T 和 C 的属性,以及检查其形式特征的方式。具体地说,我们认为这些说话人将案例特征与人称特征区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Probus
Probus Multiple-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Probus is intended as a platform for the discussion of historical and synchronic research in the field of Latin and Romance linguistics, with special emphasis on phonology, morphology, syntax, language acquisition and sociolinguistics. The journal aims to keep its readers abreast of the developments in Romance linguistics by encouraging problem-oriented contributions that combine the solid empirical foundations of philological and linguistic work with the insights provided my modern theoretical approaches.
期刊最新文献
Null objects, null nominal anaphora and antilogophoricity Nondeictic accusative and dative clitics and their variant forms in European and Brazilian Portuguese D-features or ellipsis in null subject licensing? Evidence from Brazilian and European Portuguese A gradient typology of gerund clauses: revisiting the internal and external syntax of Portuguese gerund clauses Agree, agreement dissociation and subject ellipsis. Towards a new characterization of the Null Subject Parameter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1