Supply chain sustainability, risk and transformational tension: a systems perspective

IF 7.2 3区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Logistics Management Pub Date : 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1108/ijlm-04-2023-0132
Aysu Göçer, Sebastian Brockhaus, Stanley E. Fawcett, Ceren Altuntas Vural, A. Michael Knemeyer
{"title":"Supply chain sustainability, risk and transformational tension: a systems perspective","authors":"Aysu Göçer, Sebastian Brockhaus, Stanley E. Fawcett, Ceren Altuntas Vural, A. Michael Knemeyer","doi":"10.1108/ijlm-04-2023-0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Sustainability continues to be put forth as a strategic priority. However, sustainability efforts are often deemphasized for short-term profitability. This study explores the nuances in managerial decision-making related to adopting sustainability initiatives within food supply chains in an emerging economy. We identify a complex interaction between sustainability efforts and risk mitigation. We derive a model to explain conflicting company goals, managerial decisions and system design.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>We followed an exploratory research design with an inductive approach. We analyzed data from semi-structured interviews with 29 companies representing different tiers in Turkish food supply chains. We refined and validated the interview findings through a focus group with nine senior managers. We conducted open, focused and theoretical coding in an iterative and reflective manner to analyze the data and derive our results.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>From the data, three themes emerged, indicating that managers are pursuing different, often conflicting, goals concerning value creation, risk management and sustainability performance. Managers identified and commented on new risks brought on by sustainability initiatives. These sustainability-induced risks were seen as a threat to operational performance, a driver of increased costs and a negative impact on product quality and delivery performance. Trade-offs across operating, sustainability and risk management systems create transformational tension that confounds the sustainability adoption decision-making process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The data from the study was contrasted with a theoretical framework derived from systems theory, goal-setting theory of motivation and the theory of planned behavior. We identified four distinct decision paths that managers pursue. Increased awareness of transformational tension and how it influences managerial decision-making can enhance strategic sustainability system design and initiative success.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51424,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Logistics Management","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Logistics Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlm-04-2023-0132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Sustainability continues to be put forth as a strategic priority. However, sustainability efforts are often deemphasized for short-term profitability. This study explores the nuances in managerial decision-making related to adopting sustainability initiatives within food supply chains in an emerging economy. We identify a complex interaction between sustainability efforts and risk mitigation. We derive a model to explain conflicting company goals, managerial decisions and system design.

Design/methodology/approach

We followed an exploratory research design with an inductive approach. We analyzed data from semi-structured interviews with 29 companies representing different tiers in Turkish food supply chains. We refined and validated the interview findings through a focus group with nine senior managers. We conducted open, focused and theoretical coding in an iterative and reflective manner to analyze the data and derive our results.

Findings

From the data, three themes emerged, indicating that managers are pursuing different, often conflicting, goals concerning value creation, risk management and sustainability performance. Managers identified and commented on new risks brought on by sustainability initiatives. These sustainability-induced risks were seen as a threat to operational performance, a driver of increased costs and a negative impact on product quality and delivery performance. Trade-offs across operating, sustainability and risk management systems create transformational tension that confounds the sustainability adoption decision-making process.

Originality/value

The data from the study was contrasted with a theoretical framework derived from systems theory, goal-setting theory of motivation and the theory of planned behavior. We identified four distinct decision paths that managers pursue. Increased awareness of transformational tension and how it influences managerial decision-making can enhance strategic sustainability system design and initiative success.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应链可持续性、风险和转型张力:系统视角
目的可持续发展继续被列为战略重点。然而,可持续发展的努力往往因短期盈利而被忽视。本研究探讨了在新兴经济体的食品供应链中采取可持续发展措施的管理决策中存在的细微差别。我们发现可持续发展努力与风险缓解之间存在复杂的互动关系。我们得出了一个模型来解释公司目标、管理决策和系统设计之间的冲突。我们对代表土耳其食品供应链不同层级的 29 家公司的半结构式访谈数据进行了分析。我们通过与九名高级管理人员进行焦点小组讨论,完善并验证了访谈结果。我们以迭代和反思的方式进行了开放式、集中式和理论性编码,以分析数据并得出结果。管理人员发现并评论了可持续发展举措带来的新风险。这些由可持续发展引发的风险被视为对运营绩效的威胁、成本增加的驱动因素以及对产品质量和交付绩效的负面影响。在运营系统、可持续发展系统和风险管理系统之间权衡利弊,造成了转型过程中的紧张关系,使采用可持续发展措施的决策过程陷入困境。原创性/价值这项研究的数据与源自系统理论、激励目标设定理论和计划行为理论的理论框架进行了对比。我们发现了管理者所追求的四种不同的决策路径。提高对变革性张力及其如何影响管理决策的认识,可以增强可持续发展战略系统的设计,并提高计划的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Logistics Management (IJLM) is a scholarly publication that focuses on empirical research, with a particular emphasis on qualitative studies. The journal is committed to publishing articles that contribute original ideas to the field of logistics and supply chain management, which are presented in a clear and scientifically rigorous manner. All submissions undergo a rigorous, anonymous peer review process to ensure the quality and relevance of the research. IJLM serves as a platform for the development and examination of management theories and practices in logistics and supply chain management. The journal aims to bridge the gap between academic research and practical application, providing a forum for researchers, practitioners, and educators to share insights and knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Size matters: the influence of supplier size on buyer's usage of mediated power in positive and negative supplier-induced disruptions In search of profitable growth in volatile and unpredictable environments: the role of supply chain structural adaptability Toward gender equality in operations and supply chain management: a systematic review, research themes and future directions Impacts of institutional pressures and internal abilities on green performance of transport and logistics companies Contextualizing supply chain risk governance in critical infrastructure sectors: insights from the Swedish food system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1