Impacts of institutional pressures and internal abilities on green performance of transport and logistics companies

IF 7.2 3区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Logistics Management Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1108/ijlm-09-2023-0382
Haerold Dean Layaoen, Ahmad Abareshi, Muhammad Dan-Asabe Abdulrahman, Babak Abbasi
{"title":"Impacts of institutional pressures and internal abilities on green performance of transport and logistics companies","authors":"Haerold Dean Layaoen, Ahmad Abareshi, Muhammad Dan-Asabe Abdulrahman, Babak Abbasi","doi":"10.1108/ijlm-09-2023-0382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Transport and logistics companies (TLCs) have adopted green practices to reduce their emission and waste in support of environmental protection requirements. However, not all green practices of TLCs have resulted in green performance (GP) because of inherent variations in internal abilities and external factors affecting firms in different operational environments. Using institutional (INT) and resource-based view (RBV) theories we develop a model that shows how institutional pressures and internal abilities impact TLCs’ GP.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p> Underpinned by INT and RBV theories, this study utilised structural equation modelling on a cross-sectional survey of 222 TLC firms operating in the Philippines.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p> The study reveals that TLCs’ regulatory compliance, social obligations and competitor pressures have significant direct effects on TLCs’ GP while supplier integration and resource capabilities serially mediate the relationships. The findings indicate that institutional pressures and internal abilities that shape firms’ environmental policies and procedures explain TLCs’ GP.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p> As a result of the cross-sectional nature of our data, findings may be time, population and prevailing situation dependent. The long-term validity of the research can be improved if longitudinal design is employed. We collected data from a single respondent considered as the best respondent. However, with time and resource availability, a jury of executives for each company would have been a better alternative respondent.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p> The findings of this research provide TLC managers, policymakers and other stakeholders with much-needed guidance for crafting policies and strategies for handling the challenges of caring for the planet and maintaining sustainable operations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p> Improving green practices of TLCs to enable waste and emission reductions is critical to the health and well-being of people and the planet. An environment free of pollution will result in fewer health challenges, fewer medical/insurance-related expenses, and, above all, enable a higher quality of life and a more productive workforce.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p> Studies have extensively explored the green practices of TLCs as well as the influences of both institutional pressures and internal abilities of TLCs on their green practices. This study identifies critical factors that significantly affect the GP of TLCs and provides a conceptual framework for a better understanding of the dynamics of strategic, tactical and operational issues that TCLs may face in their effort at greening the sector.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51424,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Logistics Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Logistics Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlm-09-2023-0382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Transport and logistics companies (TLCs) have adopted green practices to reduce their emission and waste in support of environmental protection requirements. However, not all green practices of TLCs have resulted in green performance (GP) because of inherent variations in internal abilities and external factors affecting firms in different operational environments. Using institutional (INT) and resource-based view (RBV) theories we develop a model that shows how institutional pressures and internal abilities impact TLCs’ GP.

Design/methodology/approach

Underpinned by INT and RBV theories, this study utilised structural equation modelling on a cross-sectional survey of 222 TLC firms operating in the Philippines.

Findings

The study reveals that TLCs’ regulatory compliance, social obligations and competitor pressures have significant direct effects on TLCs’ GP while supplier integration and resource capabilities serially mediate the relationships. The findings indicate that institutional pressures and internal abilities that shape firms’ environmental policies and procedures explain TLCs’ GP.

Research limitations/implications

As a result of the cross-sectional nature of our data, findings may be time, population and prevailing situation dependent. The long-term validity of the research can be improved if longitudinal design is employed. We collected data from a single respondent considered as the best respondent. However, with time and resource availability, a jury of executives for each company would have been a better alternative respondent.

Practical implications

The findings of this research provide TLC managers, policymakers and other stakeholders with much-needed guidance for crafting policies and strategies for handling the challenges of caring for the planet and maintaining sustainable operations.

Social implications

Improving green practices of TLCs to enable waste and emission reductions is critical to the health and well-being of people and the planet. An environment free of pollution will result in fewer health challenges, fewer medical/insurance-related expenses, and, above all, enable a higher quality of life and a more productive workforce.

Originality/value

Studies have extensively explored the green practices of TLCs as well as the influences of both institutional pressures and internal abilities of TLCs on their green practices. This study identifies critical factors that significantly affect the GP of TLCs and provides a conceptual framework for a better understanding of the dynamics of strategic, tactical and operational issues that TCLs may face in their effort at greening the sector.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度压力和内部能力对运输和物流公司绿色绩效的影响
目的运输和物流公司(TLCs)采用绿色做法减少排放和废物,以支持环保要求。然而,并不是所有的运输和物流公司的绿色实践都能带来绿色绩效(GP),这是因为在不同的运营环境中,公司的内部能力和外部因素存在固有的差异。利用制度(INT)和资源观(RBV)理论,我们建立了一个模型,说明制度压力和内部能力如何影响跨国公司的绿色绩效。 研究结果 研究结果表明,跨国公司的合规性、社会义务和竞争对手的压力对跨国公司的绿色绩效有显著的直接影响,而供应商整合和资源能力则在一定程度上调节了两者之间的关系。研究的局限性/影响 由于我们的数据具有横截面性质,研究结果可能与时间、人口和普遍情况有关。如果采用纵向设计,可以提高研究的长期有效性。我们从被视为最佳受访者的单一受访者那里收集数据。实际意义 本研究结果为跨国公司管理人员、政策制定者和其他利益相关者提供了亟需的指导,帮助他们制定政策和战略,应对爱护地球和保持可持续运营方面的挑战。一个没有污染的环境将减少健康挑战,降低医疗/保险相关费用,最重要的是提高生活质量和工作效率。本研究确定了对跨国公司全球环境计划产生重大影响的关键因素,并提供了一个概念框架,以便更好地理解跨国公司在努力实现行业绿色化的过程中可能面临的战略、战术和运营问题的动态变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Logistics Management (IJLM) is a scholarly publication that focuses on empirical research, with a particular emphasis on qualitative studies. The journal is committed to publishing articles that contribute original ideas to the field of logistics and supply chain management, which are presented in a clear and scientifically rigorous manner. All submissions undergo a rigorous, anonymous peer review process to ensure the quality and relevance of the research. IJLM serves as a platform for the development and examination of management theories and practices in logistics and supply chain management. The journal aims to bridge the gap between academic research and practical application, providing a forum for researchers, practitioners, and educators to share insights and knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Size matters: the influence of supplier size on buyer's usage of mediated power in positive and negative supplier-induced disruptions In search of profitable growth in volatile and unpredictable environments: the role of supply chain structural adaptability Toward gender equality in operations and supply chain management: a systematic review, research themes and future directions Impacts of institutional pressures and internal abilities on green performance of transport and logistics companies Contextualizing supply chain risk governance in critical infrastructure sectors: insights from the Swedish food system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1