Size matters: the influence of supplier size on buyer's usage of mediated power in positive and negative supplier-induced disruptions

IF 7.2 3区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Logistics Management Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1108/ijlm-12-2023-0532
Yu (Jade) Chu, Yanji Duan
{"title":"Size matters: the influence of supplier size on buyer's usage of mediated power in positive and negative supplier-induced disruptions","authors":"Yu (Jade) Chu, Yanji Duan","doi":"10.1108/ijlm-12-2023-0532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>While size asymmetry in buyer–supplier relationships has been studied in non-disruption contexts, this research explores how supplier size influences positive and negative supply chain disruptions. Anchoring on the commitment-trust theory (CTT), we explore buyer commitment as a mediating variable and examine how buying firms' mediated power usage depends on different supplier sizes and types of supplier-induced disruptions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Through two scenario-based behavioral experiments, we discover different patterns in buyers' use of mediated power, contingent on the types of supplier-induced disruptions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>In negative disruptions, buyers prefer more mediated power with large suppliers to control uncertainties, using reward or coercive power strategies. In positive disruptions, we find opposite results, indicating different buyers' perceptions and actions are contingent on both the supplier size and the types of disruptions. These findings underscore the complex interplay between supplier size, buyer commitment and mediated power strategies, revealing that disruption type significantly shapes buyer responses.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This paper extends the CTT framework by considering new antecedents and outcomes. We also provide a more comprehensive understanding of buyer behavior when facing positive and negative supplier-induced disruptions. Our study has limitations. Through vignette-based behavioral experiments, there is a risk that scenarios may not accurately represent real-life situations and that decision-making dynamics could be oversimplified. Future research should incorporate nuanced measurements and conduct additional qualitative research for a comprehensive understanding.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study enriches the understanding of the buyer-supplier relationship by expanding the CTT framework for a more comprehensive picture. We also offer nuanced insights into size dynamics and disruption types, emphasizing tailored strategies in supply chain management. The findings underscore the importance of understanding these nuances to employ tailored strategy in a business-to-business (B2B) context, as mediated power is contingent on multiple factors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51424,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Logistics Management","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Logistics Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlm-12-2023-0532","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

While size asymmetry in buyer–supplier relationships has been studied in non-disruption contexts, this research explores how supplier size influences positive and negative supply chain disruptions. Anchoring on the commitment-trust theory (CTT), we explore buyer commitment as a mediating variable and examine how buying firms' mediated power usage depends on different supplier sizes and types of supplier-induced disruptions.

Design/methodology/approach

Through two scenario-based behavioral experiments, we discover different patterns in buyers' use of mediated power, contingent on the types of supplier-induced disruptions.

Findings

In negative disruptions, buyers prefer more mediated power with large suppliers to control uncertainties, using reward or coercive power strategies. In positive disruptions, we find opposite results, indicating different buyers' perceptions and actions are contingent on both the supplier size and the types of disruptions. These findings underscore the complex interplay between supplier size, buyer commitment and mediated power strategies, revealing that disruption type significantly shapes buyer responses.

Research limitations/implications

This paper extends the CTT framework by considering new antecedents and outcomes. We also provide a more comprehensive understanding of buyer behavior when facing positive and negative supplier-induced disruptions. Our study has limitations. Through vignette-based behavioral experiments, there is a risk that scenarios may not accurately represent real-life situations and that decision-making dynamics could be oversimplified. Future research should incorporate nuanced measurements and conduct additional qualitative research for a comprehensive understanding.

Originality/value

This study enriches the understanding of the buyer-supplier relationship by expanding the CTT framework for a more comprehensive picture. We also offer nuanced insights into size dynamics and disruption types, emphasizing tailored strategies in supply chain management. The findings underscore the importance of understanding these nuances to employ tailored strategy in a business-to-business (B2B) context, as mediated power is contingent on multiple factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规模很重要:供应商规模对买方在供应商引发的积极和消极干扰中使用中介力量的影响
目的虽然买方与供应商关系中的规模不对称已在非中断背景下进行了研究,但本研究探讨了供应商规模如何影响供应链的正负中断。以承诺-信任理论(CTT)为基础,我们探讨了作为中介变量的买方承诺,并研究了买方企业如何根据不同的供应商规模和供应商引发的中断类型来使用中介权力。在积极干扰中,我们发现了相反的结果,表明买方的看法和行动取决于供应商规模和干扰类型。这些发现强调了供应商规模、买方承诺和中介权力策略之间复杂的相互作用,揭示了干扰类型对买方反应的重要影响。我们还对买方在面对供应商引发的积极和消极干扰时的行为提供了更全面的理解。我们的研究存在局限性。通过基于小插曲的行为实验,场景可能无法准确代表现实生活中的情况,决策动态也可能被过度简化。未来的研究应纳入细微的测量方法,并开展更多的定性研究,以获得全面的理解。原创性/价值本研究通过扩展 CTT 框架,丰富了对买方与供应商关系的理解,从而获得更全面的信息。我们还对规模动态和干扰类型提出了细致入微的见解,强调了供应链管理中的定制战略。研究结果强调了了解这些细微差别对于在企业对企业(B2B)背景下采用定制战略的重要性,因为中介力量取决于多种因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Logistics Management (IJLM) is a scholarly publication that focuses on empirical research, with a particular emphasis on qualitative studies. The journal is committed to publishing articles that contribute original ideas to the field of logistics and supply chain management, which are presented in a clear and scientifically rigorous manner. All submissions undergo a rigorous, anonymous peer review process to ensure the quality and relevance of the research. IJLM serves as a platform for the development and examination of management theories and practices in logistics and supply chain management. The journal aims to bridge the gap between academic research and practical application, providing a forum for researchers, practitioners, and educators to share insights and knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Size matters: the influence of supplier size on buyer's usage of mediated power in positive and negative supplier-induced disruptions In search of profitable growth in volatile and unpredictable environments: the role of supply chain structural adaptability Toward gender equality in operations and supply chain management: a systematic review, research themes and future directions Impacts of institutional pressures and internal abilities on green performance of transport and logistics companies Contextualizing supply chain risk governance in critical infrastructure sectors: insights from the Swedish food system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1