Proving new directed tile complexity lower bounds at temperature 1 by folding between 2D and just-barely 3D self-assembly

IF 1.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Natural Computing Pub Date : 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1007/s11047-024-09979-0
David Furcy, Scott M. Summers, Hailey Vadnais
{"title":"Proving new directed tile complexity lower bounds at temperature 1 by folding between 2D and just-barely 3D self-assembly","authors":"David Furcy, Scott M. Summers, Hailey Vadnais","doi":"10.1007/s11047-024-09979-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We study the problem of determining the size of the smallest tile set that uniquely self-assembles into a given target shape in Winfree’s abstract Tile Assembly Model (aTAM), an elegant theoretical model of DNA tile self-assembly. This problem is also known as the “directed tile complexity” problem. We prove two main results related to the directed tile complexity problem within a variant of the aTAM in which the minimum binding strength threshold (temperature) is set to 1. For our first result, self-assembly happens in a “just-barely 3D” setting, where self-assembling unit cubes are allowed to be placed in the <span>\\(z=0\\)</span> and <span>\\(z=1\\)</span> planes. This is the same setting in which Furcy, Summers and Withers (DNA 2021) recently proved lower and upper bounds on the directed tile complexity of a just-barely 3D <span>\\(k \\times N\\)</span> rectangle at temperature 1 of <span>\\(\\Omega \\left( N^{\\frac{1}{k}}\\right) \\)</span> and <span>\\(O\\left( N^{\\frac{1}{k-1}}+\\log N\\right) \\)</span>, respectively, the latter of which does not hold for <span>\\(k=2\\)</span>. Our first result closes this gap for <span>\\(k=2\\)</span> by proving an asymptotically tight bound of <span>\\(\\Theta (N)\\)</span> on the directed tile complexity of a just-barely 3D <span>\\(2 \\times N\\)</span> rectangle at temperature 1. Our proof uses a novel process by which a just-barely 3D assembly sequence is “unfolded” to an equivalent 2D assembly sequence. For our second result, we use the aforementioned lower bound by Furcy, Summers and Withers and a novel process that is complementary-in-spirit to our 3D-to-2D unfolding process, by which we “fold” a 2D tile assembly to an equivalent just-barely 3D assembly to prove a new lower bound on the directed tile complexity of a 2D <span>\\(k \\times N\\)</span> rectangle at temperature 1 of <span>\\(\\Omega \\left( \\frac{N^{\\frac{2}{k + (k \\bmod 2)}}}{k} \\right) \\)</span>. For fixed <i>k</i>, our new bound gives a nearly quadratic improvement over, and matches for general even values of <span>\\(k &lt; \\frac{\\log N}{\\log \\log N - \\log \\log \\log N}\\)</span> the state of the art lower bound on the directed tile complexity of a <span>\\(k \\times N\\)</span> rectangle at temperature 1 by Furcy, Summers and Wendlandt (DNA 2019) of <span>\\(\\Omega \\left( N^{\\frac{1}{k}}\\right) \\)</span>. While both of our results represent improvements over previous corresponding state of the art results, the proofs thereof are facilitated by novel examples of reasoning about tile self-assembly happening in 2D (just-barely 3D) as though it is happening in just-barely 3D (2D).</p>","PeriodicalId":49783,"journal":{"name":"Natural Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-024-09979-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study the problem of determining the size of the smallest tile set that uniquely self-assembles into a given target shape in Winfree’s abstract Tile Assembly Model (aTAM), an elegant theoretical model of DNA tile self-assembly. This problem is also known as the “directed tile complexity” problem. We prove two main results related to the directed tile complexity problem within a variant of the aTAM in which the minimum binding strength threshold (temperature) is set to 1. For our first result, self-assembly happens in a “just-barely 3D” setting, where self-assembling unit cubes are allowed to be placed in the \(z=0\) and \(z=1\) planes. This is the same setting in which Furcy, Summers and Withers (DNA 2021) recently proved lower and upper bounds on the directed tile complexity of a just-barely 3D \(k \times N\) rectangle at temperature 1 of \(\Omega \left( N^{\frac{1}{k}}\right) \) and \(O\left( N^{\frac{1}{k-1}}+\log N\right) \), respectively, the latter of which does not hold for \(k=2\). Our first result closes this gap for \(k=2\) by proving an asymptotically tight bound of \(\Theta (N)\) on the directed tile complexity of a just-barely 3D \(2 \times N\) rectangle at temperature 1. Our proof uses a novel process by which a just-barely 3D assembly sequence is “unfolded” to an equivalent 2D assembly sequence. For our second result, we use the aforementioned lower bound by Furcy, Summers and Withers and a novel process that is complementary-in-spirit to our 3D-to-2D unfolding process, by which we “fold” a 2D tile assembly to an equivalent just-barely 3D assembly to prove a new lower bound on the directed tile complexity of a 2D \(k \times N\) rectangle at temperature 1 of \(\Omega \left( \frac{N^{\frac{2}{k + (k \bmod 2)}}}{k} \right) \). For fixed k, our new bound gives a nearly quadratic improvement over, and matches for general even values of \(k < \frac{\log N}{\log \log N - \log \log \log N}\) the state of the art lower bound on the directed tile complexity of a \(k \times N\) rectangle at temperature 1 by Furcy, Summers and Wendlandt (DNA 2019) of \(\Omega \left( N^{\frac{1}{k}}\right) \). While both of our results represent improvements over previous corresponding state of the art results, the proofs thereof are facilitated by novel examples of reasoning about tile self-assembly happening in 2D (just-barely 3D) as though it is happening in just-barely 3D (2D).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过二维和勉强三维自组装之间的折叠,证明温度为 1 时新的定向瓦片复杂性下限
我们研究的问题是,在 Winfree 的抽象瓦片组装模型(aTAM)中,如何确定能唯一自组装成给定目标形状的最小瓦片集的大小,这是一个优雅的 DNA 瓦片自组装理论模型。这个问题也被称为 "定向瓦片复杂性 "问题。在最小结合强度阈值(温度)设为 1 的 aTAM 变体中,我们证明了与定向瓦片复杂性问题相关的两个主要结果。对于我们的第一个结果,自组装发生在一个 "勉强三维 "的环境中,在这个环境中,自组装单元立方体被允许放置在 \(z=0\) 和 \(z=1\) 平面上。弗西、萨默斯和威瑟斯(DNA 2021)最近也是在这种情况下证明了在温度为1的情况下,有向瓦片复杂度的下限和上限,分别是(Omega \left( N^{\frac{1}{k}}right) \)和(O/left( N^{\frac{1}{k-1}}+\log N\right) \)、分别成立,而后者在(k=2)时并不成立。我们的第一个结果通过证明在温度为1的情况下,一个几乎是三维的(2乘以N)矩形的有向瓦片复杂度的渐近紧约束((\Theta (N)\)),缩小了(k=2)的这一差距。我们的证明使用了一个新颖的过程,通过这个过程,一个刚体三维装配序列被 "展开 "为一个等价的二维装配序列。对于我们的第二个结果,我们使用了 Furcy、Summers 和 Withers 的上述下限,以及一个与我们的三维到二维展开过程在精神上互补的新过程、通过这个过程,我们把一个二维瓦片组合 "折叠 "成一个等价的勉强算得上三维的组合,从而证明了一个温度为1的二维(k乘以N)矩形的有向瓦片复杂度的新下界(\Omega \left( \frac{N^{\frac{2}{k + (k bmod 2)}}}{k} )。\right) \)。对于固定的 k,我们的新边界比 \(k < 的一般偶数值有近乎二次方的改进,并且相匹配;\在温度为1的情况下,Furcy、Summers和Wendlandt(DNA 2019)提出的有向瓦片复杂度下限为(Omega \left( N^{\frac{1}{k}}\right) \)。虽然我们的这两个结果都代表了对之前相应技术水平结果的改进,但通过新颖的例子,我们可以推理出瓷砖自组装发生在二维(just-barely 3D ),就好像它发生在just-barely 3D (2D)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Natural Computing
Natural Computing Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
49
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal is soliciting papers on all aspects of natural computing. Because of the interdisciplinary character of the journal a special effort will be made to solicit survey, review, and tutorial papers which would make research trends in a given subarea more accessible to the broad audience of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Real-time computing and robust memory with deterministic chemical reaction networks Integrated dynamic spiking neural P systems for fault line selection in distribution network Reaction mining for reaction systems Melding Boolean networks and reaction systems under synchronous, asynchronous and most permissive semantics Distinguishing genelet circuit input pulses via a pulse detector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1