SIBs and the implications on the relationship between social enterprises and the public sector: a case study from the Netherlands

Valentina Patetta, Marta Enciso-Santocildes
{"title":"SIBs and the implications on the relationship between social enterprises and the public sector: a case study from the Netherlands","authors":"Valentina Patetta, Marta Enciso-Santocildes","doi":"10.1108/ijpsm-05-2023-0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The aim of this paper is to provide insights and knowledge about the motivations and implications for social enterprises' participation in SIBs, particularly in terms of collaboration and partnership with the public sector, as well as the different positions on this issue. The overall aim, therefore, is to show how social enterprises and public organisations have interacted in the context of SIBs and what has been achieved by participating.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This multiple case study approach applies qualitative methods like observations and semi-structured and unstructured interviews.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study shows that SIBs can be an option for financing social enterprises within a strategy of income diversification and resource dependency. Despite tensions and complexities, SIBs can renew the traditional funding relationship by adding innovation, strengthening the co-creation process and creating a stable relationship.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>Research findings may lack generalisability due to the specific context in which the case study is rooted.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The paper offers practical implications in terms of insights and suggestions for social enterprises and the public sector interested in developing the scheme.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper adds the voice and perspective of social enterprises on the relationship with the public sector within the framework of SIBs initiatives.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47437,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Sector Management","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Sector Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-05-2023-0132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this paper is to provide insights and knowledge about the motivations and implications for social enterprises' participation in SIBs, particularly in terms of collaboration and partnership with the public sector, as well as the different positions on this issue. The overall aim, therefore, is to show how social enterprises and public organisations have interacted in the context of SIBs and what has been achieved by participating.

Design/methodology/approach

This multiple case study approach applies qualitative methods like observations and semi-structured and unstructured interviews.

Findings

The study shows that SIBs can be an option for financing social enterprises within a strategy of income diversification and resource dependency. Despite tensions and complexities, SIBs can renew the traditional funding relationship by adding innovation, strengthening the co-creation process and creating a stable relationship.

Research limitations/implications

Research findings may lack generalisability due to the specific context in which the case study is rooted.

Practical implications

The paper offers practical implications in terms of insights and suggestions for social enterprises and the public sector interested in developing the scheme.

Originality/value

This paper adds the voice and perspective of social enterprises on the relationship with the public sector within the framework of SIBs initiatives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会企业投资机制及其对社会企业与公共部门之间关系的影响:荷兰案例研究
目的本文旨在提供有关社会企业参与社会投资机构的动机和影响的见解和知识,特别是在与 公共部门的合作和伙伴关系方面,以及在这一问题上的不同立场。因此,总体目标是说明社会企业和公共组织如何在社会投资机构的背景下进行互动,以及通过参与取得了哪些成果。研究结果该研究表明,在收入多元化和资源依赖的战略下,社会投资机构可以成为社会企业融资的一种选择。尽管存在紧张和复杂的关系,但社会企业投资银行可以通过增加创新、加强共同创造过程和创建稳定的关系来更新传统的资助关系。研究局限性/影响由于案例研究的具体背景,研究结果可能缺乏普遍性。原创性/价值本文补充了社会企业在社会企业投资银行倡议框架内与公共部门关系的声音和观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Public Sector Management (IJPSM) publishes academic articles on the management, governance, and reform of public sector organizations around the world, aiming to provide an accessible and valuable resource for academics and public managers alike. IJPSM covers the full range of public management research including studies of organizations, public finances, performance management, Human Resources Management, strategy, leadership, accountability, integrity, collaboration, e-government, procurement, and more. IJPSM encourages scholars to publish their empirical research and is particularly interested in comparative findings. IJPSM is open to articles using a variety of research methods and theoretical approaches.
期刊最新文献
Teleworking and work-family balance in public educational institutions Service satisfaction among a language minority: a randomized survey experiment on the satisfaction of Swedish-speaking Finns with early childhood education The effect of political environment on security and privacy of contact tracing apps evaluation The many roads to reform: a configurational analysis of the conditions supporting performance management implementation Blockchain for the circular economy, implications for public governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1