The Taste Liking Questionnaire (TasteLQ) – A tool for assessment of taste liking in the Danish population

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105176
Sara Haydar , Camilla Cederbye Karlsson , Allan Linneberg , Line Lund Kårhus , Lars Ängquist , Torben Hansen , Wender Bredie , Niels Grarup
{"title":"The Taste Liking Questionnaire (TasteLQ) – A tool for assessment of taste liking in the Danish population","authors":"Sara Haydar ,&nbsp;Camilla Cederbye Karlsson ,&nbsp;Allan Linneberg ,&nbsp;Line Lund Kårhus ,&nbsp;Lars Ängquist ,&nbsp;Torben Hansen ,&nbsp;Wender Bredie ,&nbsp;Niels Grarup","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to develop and validate a Taste Liking Questionnaire (<em>TasteLQ</em>) to measure the liking of taste and oral sensations represented by food items in the Danish adult population. Food items adapted to the Danish culture were selected to represent five basic tastes (sweet, salty, sour, bitter, umami), fat sensation and two oral sensations (astringency and pungency). The reliability and validity of the <em>TasteLQ</em> were assessed in a multi-step process. The list of selected items was refined by an expert panel and subsequently clustered based on taste and sensation intensity ratings confirming their singularity for each modality. <em>TasteLQ</em> was found to be clear and quick to complete with a good test–retest reliability. In a hedonic liking evaluation (n = 38), moderate agreement was found between questionnaire-based taste liking scores and direct measurements of taste liking. Construct validity of each intensity-derived modality was evaluated in Danish participants (n = 7,201). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed one, two, and three-factor structures with adequate fit of the tested models. The majority of identified factors displayed an acceptable to good internal consistency reliability. Factor analysis led to the exclusion of four items consequently yielding a final 44-item questionnaire. In conclusion, <em>TasteLQ</em> is a valid and feasible tool to measure taste and sensation liking in Danish adults. The questionnaire can be implemented in large-scale studies from which valuable insight to the role of taste liking in food choice, eating behavior, and disease risk factors can be gained.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000788/pdfft?md5=1eb43a2d68d4c07a0020df026b0b1d9b&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324000788-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000788","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate a Taste Liking Questionnaire (TasteLQ) to measure the liking of taste and oral sensations represented by food items in the Danish adult population. Food items adapted to the Danish culture were selected to represent five basic tastes (sweet, salty, sour, bitter, umami), fat sensation and two oral sensations (astringency and pungency). The reliability and validity of the TasteLQ were assessed in a multi-step process. The list of selected items was refined by an expert panel and subsequently clustered based on taste and sensation intensity ratings confirming their singularity for each modality. TasteLQ was found to be clear and quick to complete with a good test–retest reliability. In a hedonic liking evaluation (n = 38), moderate agreement was found between questionnaire-based taste liking scores and direct measurements of taste liking. Construct validity of each intensity-derived modality was evaluated in Danish participants (n = 7,201). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed one, two, and three-factor structures with adequate fit of the tested models. The majority of identified factors displayed an acceptable to good internal consistency reliability. Factor analysis led to the exclusion of four items consequently yielding a final 44-item questionnaire. In conclusion, TasteLQ is a valid and feasible tool to measure taste and sensation liking in Danish adults. The questionnaire can be implemented in large-scale studies from which valuable insight to the role of taste liking in food choice, eating behavior, and disease risk factors can be gained.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口味偏好问卷(TasteLQ)--丹麦人口味偏好评估工具
本研究旨在开发和验证口味喜好问卷(TasteLQ),以测量丹麦成年人对食品所代表的口味和口腔感觉的喜好程度。根据丹麦文化选择的食物代表了五种基本味道(甜、咸、酸、苦、鲜)、脂肪感觉和两种口腔感觉(涩和辛)。对 TasteLQ 的信度和效度进行了多步骤评估。专家小组对所选项目清单进行了完善,随后根据味觉和感觉强度评级对项目进行了分组,确认了每种模式的单一性。结果表明,TasteLQ 非常清晰,填写快捷,测试-再测试的可靠性也很高。在一项享乐型喜好评估(n = 38)中,基于问卷的味觉喜好评分与味觉喜好的直接测量结果基本一致。对丹麦参与者(n = 7,201)的每种强度衍生模式的结构有效性进行了评估。探索性和确认性因子分析显示,测试模型具有充分拟合的单、双和三因子结构。大多数确定的因子显示出可接受到良好的内部一致性可靠性。因子分析排除了 4 个项目,最终得出 44 个项目的问卷。总之,TasteLQ 是测量丹麦成年人味觉和感觉喜好的有效而可行的工具。该问卷可用于大规模研究,从中可获得有关口味喜好在食物选择、饮食行为和疾病风险因素中的作用的宝贵见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Snack attack: What factors affect American snacking behavior? Themes and sentiments in conversations about food waste on Twitter: Proposal of a framework using neural topic modeling Health Star Rating Labels: A systematic review and future research agenda Momentum for organic food purchase intention and actual adoption- moderating effects of social media influencer and celebrity endorser Segmenting and profiling seaweed consumers: A cross-cultural comparison of Australia, the United Kingdom and Croatia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1