Robotic Telepresence and Face-to-Face Collaborative Nursing Simulation: A Correlational, Cross-Sectional Study

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101525
Kathleen M. Huun PhD , James E. Slaven MS
{"title":"Robotic Telepresence and Face-to-Face Collaborative Nursing Simulation: A Correlational, Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Kathleen M. Huun PhD ,&nbsp;James E. Slaven MS","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Mobile robotic telepresence provides an equitable opportunity for distance learners to collaborate with face-to-face counterparts through live simulation at a campus-based <em>point of learning</em>. The Technology Acceptance Model serves as the theoretical framework regarding ease of use and perceived usefulness of telepresence robots as the stress and anxiety of simulation and novel technologies can impact learning.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using peer/collaborative learning, waves of undergraduate nursing student dyads (distance/telepresence with face-to-face) provided patient care in multiroom simulations. The correlational, cross-sectional study surveyed students to assess a relationship between anxiety, use of new technology, and student satisfaction, and self-confidence in learning.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>State trait anxiety inventory scores were significantly higher in distance/telepresence students. The mean overall score for satisfaction/self-confidence in learning was favorable for all students.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Telepresence robots in simulation may increase learner acceptance and readiness to use such technology within their future practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Mobile robotic telepresence provides an equitable opportunity for distance learners to collaborate with face-to-face counterparts through live simulation at a campus-based point of learning. The Technology Acceptance Model serves as the theoretical framework regarding ease of use and perceived usefulness of telepresence robots as the stress and anxiety of simulation and novel technologies can impact learning.

Methods

Using peer/collaborative learning, waves of undergraduate nursing student dyads (distance/telepresence with face-to-face) provided patient care in multiroom simulations. The correlational, cross-sectional study surveyed students to assess a relationship between anxiety, use of new technology, and student satisfaction, and self-confidence in learning.

Results

State trait anxiety inventory scores were significantly higher in distance/telepresence students. The mean overall score for satisfaction/self-confidence in learning was favorable for all students.

Conclusion

Telepresence robots in simulation may increase learner acceptance and readiness to use such technology within their future practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人远程呈现与面对面协作护理模拟:一项相关的横断面研究
背景远程呈现移动机器人为远程学习者提供了一个公平的机会,使他们可以在校园内的学习点通过现场模拟与面对面的同行进行合作。技术接受模型是关于远程呈现机器人的易用性和感知有用性的理论框架,因为模拟和新技术带来的压力和焦虑会影响学习。方法利用同伴/协作学习,一波又一波的护理本科生二人组(远程/远程呈现与面对面)在多房间模拟中提供病人护理。这项相关的横断面研究对学生进行了调查,以评估焦虑、新技术的使用、学生满意度和学习自信心之间的关系。所有学生在学习满意度/自信心方面的平均总分都很高。结论在模拟教学中使用远程呈现机器人可能会提高学生的接受度,并使他们更愿意在未来的实践中使用这种技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
期刊最新文献
Embracing quick response technology to bring assessments to life during simulation Combining storytelling and a scenario re-enactment of Mt. Everest expeditions to practice cognitive and social skills Psychometric Testing of NASA-TLX to Measure Learners’ Cognitive Load in Individual and Group Nursing Simulations Becoming a team player: Evaluating a simulation interprofessional activity between third year nursing students and second year medical radiation science students - A feasibility study Interprofessional Learning for Nursing Students during a Mass Casualty Incident Simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1