Diversity of Knowledge-Sharing Behavior to Encourage the Practice of Robusta Coffee Red-Picking (Case Study of Temanggung Robusta Coffee Farmer, Indonesia)

H. Ihsaniyati, S. Sarwoprasodjo, Pudji Muljono, D. Gandasari
{"title":"Diversity of Knowledge-Sharing Behavior to Encourage the Practice of Robusta Coffee Red-Picking (Case Study of Temanggung Robusta Coffee Farmer, Indonesia)","authors":"H. Ihsaniyati, S. Sarwoprasodjo, Pudji Muljono, D. Gandasari","doi":"10.20961/carakatani.v39i1.82647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Red-picking is the key to good coffee quality and is essential for increasing farmers’ income, added value, competitiveness, and development. Knowledge-sharing is one solution to improve the knowledge confidence of farmers and the reach of dissemination of red-picking practices. This research aims to determine the diversity of knowledge-sharing behavior related to red-picking practices according to farmers’ socio-economic status. This research was conducted in a constructivist paradigm with a qualitative approach and case study strategy. According to specific characteristics, seven primary informants were determined by staged, purposive, and peer group discussions. Temanggung coffee stakeholders take part as supporting informants. Interviews, focus group discussions, social media and document observations, expert discussions, peer group discussions, literature reviews, and documentation were used to collect research data. The data were analyzed qualitatively using the NVivo 12 Plus. Research has found that diversity of knowledge-sharing tends to encourage red-picking practices. The research findings also stated that group farmers with an area of land ≤ 1 ha, younger generation group farmers, group farmers with roles as gathering traders, and group farmers who use social media have more diverse knowledge-sharing behaviors. The practice of red-picking can be encouraged by supporting farmers in carrying out knowledge-sharing activities with other farmers with different characteristics. This study implies that the resulting findings will enrich the concept of knowledge-sharing by describing how people utilize social and offline media in sharing knowledge to encourage red-picking practices.","PeriodicalId":513248,"journal":{"name":"Caraka Tani: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture","volume":"48 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caraka Tani: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/carakatani.v39i1.82647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Red-picking is the key to good coffee quality and is essential for increasing farmers’ income, added value, competitiveness, and development. Knowledge-sharing is one solution to improve the knowledge confidence of farmers and the reach of dissemination of red-picking practices. This research aims to determine the diversity of knowledge-sharing behavior related to red-picking practices according to farmers’ socio-economic status. This research was conducted in a constructivist paradigm with a qualitative approach and case study strategy. According to specific characteristics, seven primary informants were determined by staged, purposive, and peer group discussions. Temanggung coffee stakeholders take part as supporting informants. Interviews, focus group discussions, social media and document observations, expert discussions, peer group discussions, literature reviews, and documentation were used to collect research data. The data were analyzed qualitatively using the NVivo 12 Plus. Research has found that diversity of knowledge-sharing tends to encourage red-picking practices. The research findings also stated that group farmers with an area of land ≤ 1 ha, younger generation group farmers, group farmers with roles as gathering traders, and group farmers who use social media have more diverse knowledge-sharing behaviors. The practice of red-picking can be encouraged by supporting farmers in carrying out knowledge-sharing activities with other farmers with different characteristics. This study implies that the resulting findings will enrich the concept of knowledge-sharing by describing how people utilize social and offline media in sharing knowledge to encourage red-picking practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼓励罗布斯塔咖啡红摘实践的知识分享行为多样性(印度尼西亚 Temanggung 罗布斯塔咖啡种植者案例研究)
红采是保证咖啡质量的关键,对增加农民收入、提高附加值、增强竞争力和促进发展至关重要。知识共享是提高农民知识自信和扩大红采做法传播范围的一个解决方案。本研究旨在根据农民的社会经济地位,确定与红采摘实践相关的知识共享行为的多样性。本研究采用建构主义范式,采用定性方法和案例研究策略。根据具体特征,通过阶段性、目的性和同伴小组讨论确定了七名主要信息提供者。Temanggung 咖啡的利益相关者作为辅助信息提供者参与研究。研究采用访谈、焦点小组讨论、社交媒体和文献观察、专家讨论、同行小组讨论、文献综述和文献资料等方式收集研究数据。使用 NVivo 12 Plus 对数据进行了定性分析。研究发现,知识分享的多样性往往会鼓励红采做法。研究结果还表明,土地面积小于 1 公顷的集体农户、年轻一代的集体农户、扮演集市贸易者角色的集体农户以及使用社交媒体的集体农户的知识共享行为更加多样化。可以通过支持农民与其他具有不同特征的农民开展知识共享活动来鼓励红采行为。本研究通过描述人们如何利用社交媒体和离线媒体分享知识以鼓励采红实践,从而丰富了知识分享的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity of Knowledge-Sharing Behavior to Encourage the Practice of Robusta Coffee Red-Picking (Case Study of Temanggung Robusta Coffee Farmer, Indonesia) Status and Development of Agricultural Public-Private Partnership Program Implementation in China Identification and Reduction of Bitter Taste Determinant Compounds in Chocolate Spread Formulated with Candlenut Analysis of the Emerging Market for Poultry By-Products in Ghana Phytohormone-Based Biostimulants as an Alternative Mitigating Strategy for Horticultural Plants Grown Under Adverse Multi-Stress Conditions: Common South African Stress Factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1