Autobiographical myth by Igor Kholin in the context of soviet discourse (based on the novel “Cats and Mice”)

A. Bokarev, Yulia V. Adrian
{"title":"Autobiographical myth by Igor Kholin in the context of soviet discourse (based on the novel “Cats and Mice”)","authors":"A. Bokarev, Yulia V. Adrian","doi":"10.34216/1998-0817-2023-29-4-109-117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is aimed at considering the genesis, structure and representation forms of the autobiographical myth by “Lianozovo School” poet Igor Kholin in his novel “Cats and Mice”. It is proved that the sociocultural context and world-modeling category of this myth is the opposition between official and uncensored literature, which is characteristic of Soviet discourse and brings to the fore the author’s role of a nonconformist poet. The latter is formed through introducing a system of characters – Igor Kholin’s “twins” – into the text, to whom he attributes not only the details of his private life, but also his published works. As a result, artist and amateur poet Nikolai Sergeevich, poets Holly and Savely Volin and the Author writing the novel “Cats and Mice” are united by a common biography which excludes their involvement in artistic practices that dominate the cultural space. The desire to dissociate himself from them also determines the key semes of Igor Kholin’s myth – “opposition to official art” emphasising the contraposition of underground literature to any “permitted” forms of literature and “pretense to aesthetic superiority” absolutising its artistic primacy and avant-gardism. The first seme is explicit and “served” by the motifs of an aesthetic demarcation between “state publishing” and “self-publishing”, their mutual intolerance and notorious inadequacy of assessments. The second seme is implicit and “supported” by motifs realising the thematic invariant of “freedom Vs. oppression” (with the former being uncensored literature with sharp “discrepancy” with reality and the unpredictability of text unfolding). Therefore, complicated and contradictory relationships between official and uncensored art in Igor Kholin’s autobiographical myth are whittled away to a spectacular yet extremely simplified scheme which excludes any forms of their interaction other than confrontation.","PeriodicalId":326235,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Kostroma State University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Kostroma State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2023-29-4-109-117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is aimed at considering the genesis, structure and representation forms of the autobiographical myth by “Lianozovo School” poet Igor Kholin in his novel “Cats and Mice”. It is proved that the sociocultural context and world-modeling category of this myth is the opposition between official and uncensored literature, which is characteristic of Soviet discourse and brings to the fore the author’s role of a nonconformist poet. The latter is formed through introducing a system of characters – Igor Kholin’s “twins” – into the text, to whom he attributes not only the details of his private life, but also his published works. As a result, artist and amateur poet Nikolai Sergeevich, poets Holly and Savely Volin and the Author writing the novel “Cats and Mice” are united by a common biography which excludes their involvement in artistic practices that dominate the cultural space. The desire to dissociate himself from them also determines the key semes of Igor Kholin’s myth – “opposition to official art” emphasising the contraposition of underground literature to any “permitted” forms of literature and “pretense to aesthetic superiority” absolutising its artistic primacy and avant-gardism. The first seme is explicit and “served” by the motifs of an aesthetic demarcation between “state publishing” and “self-publishing”, their mutual intolerance and notorious inadequacy of assessments. The second seme is implicit and “supported” by motifs realising the thematic invariant of “freedom Vs. oppression” (with the former being uncensored literature with sharp “discrepancy” with reality and the unpredictability of text unfolding). Therefore, complicated and contradictory relationships between official and uncensored art in Igor Kholin’s autobiographical myth are whittled away to a spectacular yet extremely simplified scheme which excludes any forms of their interaction other than confrontation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊戈尔-霍林在苏联话语背景下的自传体神话(根据小说《猫和老鼠》改编)
文章旨在探讨 "利亚诺佐沃学派 "诗人伊戈尔-霍林在其小说《猫和老鼠》中的自传体神话的起源、结构和表现形式。事实证明,这一神话的社会文化背景和世界模型范畴是官方文学与未经审查的文学之间的对立,这是苏联话语的特点,并凸显了作者作为一个非主流诗人的角色。后者是通过在文本中引入伊戈尔-霍林的 "双胞胎 "角色系统形成的,他不仅将自己的私人生活细节归功于他们,还将自己发表的作品归功于他们。因此,艺术家和业余诗人尼古拉-谢尔盖耶维奇、诗人霍利和萨维里-沃林以及小说《猫和老鼠》的作者被一个共同的传记联系在一起,而这个传记将他们排除在主导文化空间的艺术实践之外。与他们划清界限的愿望也决定了伊戈尔-霍林神话的主要特征--"反对官方艺术",强调地下文学与任何 "允许的 "文学形式的对立;"伪装美学优越性",将其艺术至上性和先锋性绝对化。第一种类型是明确的,"服务 "于 "国家出版 "和 "自费出版 "之间的美学分界线、它们之间的相互不容忍和众所周知的评估不足等主题。第二类是隐性的,由实现 "自由与压迫 "这一主题不变性的主题所 "支持"(前者是未经审查的文学,与现实有明显的 "差异",文本的展开不可预测)。因此,在伊戈尔-霍林的自传体神话中,官方艺术与未经审查的艺术之间复杂而矛盾的关系被简化为一个壮观而又极其简化的方案,排除了它们之间除对抗之外的任何形式的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Publicly available information on the creditworthiness of individuals in the Russian empire (historical and legal analysis) Autobiographical myth by Igor Kholin in the context of soviet discourse (based on the novel “Cats and Mice”) Language and cultural creolisation in nigerian script texts Time in the novel “The Snake’s Pass” by Bram Stoker as a plot-forming element History of formation in Kazakhstan and the combat path of the 310th infantry division during the Soviet-German war (1941-1945)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1