Study to analyse the intraoperative and post-operative complications of total abdominal hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy

Gunjan Yadav, Meenal Verma
{"title":"Study to analyse the intraoperative and post-operative complications of total abdominal hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy","authors":"Gunjan Yadav, Meenal Verma","doi":"10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20240794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laparoscopic hysterectomy is preferable due to faster recovery, decreased morbidity and absence of an abdominal incision. The aim of the study was to compare the risks and complications of total laparoscopy hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy in terms of intra-operative and post-operative complications.\nMethods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in the Gynaecology department at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Central Railway Hospital, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India. The data for the past 2-year record was taken for analysis. A total of 72 subjects were included in the study and were divided into two groups with 36 patients under TAH (total abdominal hysterectomy) group and 36 under TLH (Total Laproscopic hysterectomy) group. The primary outcome of the present analysis were incidence of perioperative complications like blood loss and the secondary outcomes were operating time, blood loss, urinary tract injury, rate of conversion to laparotomy, postoperative pain, and length of post operative stay.\nResults: The mean intra-operative blood loss was measured among both the groups and it was found to be very high among TAH group (215 ml) compared to TLH group (124 ml) and the difference was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). Similarly, the duration of operative procedure was found to be less in TLH group (46.5 mins) compared to TAH group (76.8 mins) and the difference was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). Post-operative wound infection (14 vs 0) was found to be more among the patients in TAH group than that of the TLH group and the difference was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05).\nConclusions: TLH is a safe and effective surgical treatment for benign gynaecological diseases and should be offered whenever possible, taking into account the low rate of complications and cost-effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":14225,"journal":{"name":"International journal of reproduction, contraception, obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"57 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of reproduction, contraception, obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20240794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic hysterectomy is preferable due to faster recovery, decreased morbidity and absence of an abdominal incision. The aim of the study was to compare the risks and complications of total laparoscopy hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy in terms of intra-operative and post-operative complications. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in the Gynaecology department at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Central Railway Hospital, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India. The data for the past 2-year record was taken for analysis. A total of 72 subjects were included in the study and were divided into two groups with 36 patients under TAH (total abdominal hysterectomy) group and 36 under TLH (Total Laproscopic hysterectomy) group. The primary outcome of the present analysis were incidence of perioperative complications like blood loss and the secondary outcomes were operating time, blood loss, urinary tract injury, rate of conversion to laparotomy, postoperative pain, and length of post operative stay. Results: The mean intra-operative blood loss was measured among both the groups and it was found to be very high among TAH group (215 ml) compared to TLH group (124 ml) and the difference was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). Similarly, the duration of operative procedure was found to be less in TLH group (46.5 mins) compared to TAH group (76.8 mins) and the difference was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). Post-operative wound infection (14 vs 0) was found to be more among the patients in TAH group than that of the TLH group and the difference was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusions: TLH is a safe and effective surgical treatment for benign gynaecological diseases and should be offered whenever possible, taking into account the low rate of complications and cost-effectiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析全腹子宫切除术和全腹腔镜子宫切除术术中和术后并发症的研究
背景:腹腔镜子宫切除术因其恢复快、发病率低且无需腹部切口而更受欢迎。本研究旨在比较全腹腔镜子宫切除术和全腹腔镜子宫切除术在术中和术后并发症方面的风险和并发症:在印度中央邦贾巴尔布尔市中央铁路医院妇产科进行了一项回顾性观察研究。对过去两年的数据进行了分析。研究共纳入 72 名受试者,分为两组,TAH(全腹子宫切除术)组和 TLH(全腹腔镜子宫切除术)组各 36 名患者。本分析的主要结果是围手术期并发症(如失血)的发生率,次要结果是手术时间、失血量、尿路损伤、转为开腹手术的比率、术后疼痛和术后住院时间:结果:测量了两组患者的术中平均失血量,发现 TAH 组(215 毫升)比 TLH 组(124 毫升)高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。同样,TLH 组的手术时间(46.5 分钟)少于 TAH 组(76.8 分钟),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后伤口感染(14 对 0)在 TAH 组患者中的发生率高于 TLH 组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05):考虑到低并发症发生率和成本效益,TLH 是一种安全有效的妇科良性疾病手术治疗方法,应尽可能采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy as primary and associated indications for caesarean section Tracking immunization milestones: a community-based survey of child vaccination compliance from birth to one year age in India Menstrual hygiene among the undergraduate medical college students in Churachandpur Medical College, Manipur, North Eastern state of India A study on feto-maternal outcome in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes Modes and timing of delivery along with maternal and neonatal conditions for preeclamptic patients of Rajshahi, Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1