Investigation of the Multidrug Resistance Pattern of Bacteria Isolated from Car and Office Door Handles in a Tertiary Institution

Testimonies C. Adebayo-Olajide, Goodhead, A. Dakoru, Ekeneokot E. Uche, Usman-Wali Maryam
{"title":"Investigation of the Multidrug Resistance Pattern of Bacteria Isolated from Car and Office Door Handles in a Tertiary Institution","authors":"Testimonies C. Adebayo-Olajide, Goodhead, A. Dakoru, Ekeneokot E. Uche, Usman-Wali Maryam","doi":"10.9734/ijpr/2024/v13i2277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multidrug-resistant bacteria have posed a public health concern over the years, especially with the difficulty and cost of treatment of infections they cause. Fomites such as door handles are thus potent means through which pathogens are transmitted from one person to another as contact with them is made. This study thus involves isolating antibiotic-resistant bacteria from car and office door handles in a university environment. Using the simple random sampling method, twenty samples (20) from car door handles and twenty samples (20) from office door handles were collected, the isolation of bacteria was done using standard microbiological procedures and identification of the isolates was done using cultural, microscopic and biochemical characterization. Determination of the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the isolates was done using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method on Muller Hinton agar. Antibiotics used included Ofloxacin (5 µg), Gentamicin (10 µg), Ceftriaxone (30 µg), Augmentin (30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (5 µg), Erythromycin (5 µg), Streptomycin (30 µg) and Cloxacillin (30 µg). The results showed a significant frequency of occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus at 35% and Klebsiella pneumoniae having least at 5%. From car door handles, S. epidermidis recorded 37% while K. pneumoniae recorded the least with 17.4%. The isolates exhibited resistance to antibiotics including Augmentin and Ceftriaxone (≤22 mm) while they were more susceptible to Ofloxacin (≥16 mm). All the K. pneumoniae isolated from car door handles exhibited resistance to Augmentin and Ceftriaxone. These results show that these surfaces could be a possible reservoir of infections caused by resistant bacteria, leading to difficulty in the treatment of infections caused by them.","PeriodicalId":129993,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pathogen Research","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pathogen Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpr/2024/v13i2277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multidrug-resistant bacteria have posed a public health concern over the years, especially with the difficulty and cost of treatment of infections they cause. Fomites such as door handles are thus potent means through which pathogens are transmitted from one person to another as contact with them is made. This study thus involves isolating antibiotic-resistant bacteria from car and office door handles in a university environment. Using the simple random sampling method, twenty samples (20) from car door handles and twenty samples (20) from office door handles were collected, the isolation of bacteria was done using standard microbiological procedures and identification of the isolates was done using cultural, microscopic and biochemical characterization. Determination of the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the isolates was done using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method on Muller Hinton agar. Antibiotics used included Ofloxacin (5 µg), Gentamicin (10 µg), Ceftriaxone (30 µg), Augmentin (30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (5 µg), Erythromycin (5 µg), Streptomycin (30 µg) and Cloxacillin (30 µg). The results showed a significant frequency of occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus at 35% and Klebsiella pneumoniae having least at 5%. From car door handles, S. epidermidis recorded 37% while K. pneumoniae recorded the least with 17.4%. The isolates exhibited resistance to antibiotics including Augmentin and Ceftriaxone (≤22 mm) while they were more susceptible to Ofloxacin (≥16 mm). All the K. pneumoniae isolated from car door handles exhibited resistance to Augmentin and Ceftriaxone. These results show that these surfaces could be a possible reservoir of infections caused by resistant bacteria, leading to difficulty in the treatment of infections caused by them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查从一所高等院校的汽车和办公室门把手中分离出的细菌的多重耐药性模式
多年来,耐多药细菌已成为公共卫生的一个问题,尤其是在治疗由它们引起的感染时,治疗难度大、费用高。因此,像门把手这样的传播媒介是病原体在人与人之间传播的有效途径。因此,本研究从大学环境中的汽车和办公室门把手中分离抗生素细菌。采用简单随机抽样法,从汽车门把手和办公室门把手各采集了 20 个样本,使用标准微生物学程序分离细菌,并通过文化、显微镜和生化鉴定对分离物进行鉴定。采用柯比-鲍尔盘扩散法在 Muller Hinton 琼脂上确定分离菌的抗生素敏感性模式。使用的抗生素包括氧氟沙星(5 微克)、庆大霉素(10 微克)、头孢曲松(30 微克)、奥门新(30 微克)、环丙沙星(5 微克)、红霉素(5 微克)、链霉素(30 微克)和氯霉素(30 微克)。结果显示,金黄色葡萄球菌的出现率为 35%,肺炎克雷伯菌的出现率最低,为 5%。在车门把手中,表皮葡萄球菌占 37%,肺炎克雷伯菌最少,占 17.4%。分离出的菌株对抗生素有抗药性,包括奥克门汀(Augmentin)和头孢曲松(Ceftriaxone)(≤22 mm),而对氧氟沙星(Ofloxacin)的敏感性较高(≥16 mm)。从汽车门把手中分离出的所有肺炎双球菌都对奥克门汀和头孢曲松表现出抗药性。这些结果表明,这些表面可能是耐药细菌引起的感染的贮藏库,从而导致治疗由其引起的感染的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Waterborne Zoonotic Diseases and Antimicrobial Resistance: Indian Policy and Onehealth Approach Cross Sectional Study on the Prevalence of Tuberculosis among the District of Sudhnuti, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Investigation of the Multidrug Resistance Pattern of Bacteria Isolated from Car and Office Door Handles in a Tertiary Institution Molecular Characterization of Plasmid-mediated Quinolone Resistant Salmonella typhi From Patients Attending Federal Medical Center, Jabi, Abuja, Nigeria The Use of Immersion Oil in Parasitology Light Microscopic Examination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1