Estimation of terminal ballistics parameters for several 7.62×51 mm projectiles using numerical simulations

Catovic Alan
{"title":"Estimation of terminal ballistics parameters for several 7.62×51 mm projectiles using numerical simulations","authors":"Catovic Alan","doi":"10.1177/15485129241240768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Six widely used 7.62 ×51 mm projectile types (M80, M61, P80/1, M80A1, M1158, and M993) were subjected to the analysis in this paper. Numerical simulations (Ansys Autodyn) of projectile impacts on hard steel targets were performed as part of this analysis. Projectiles had the same impact velocity (800 m/s). This allowed evaluation of the projectile’s design and material’s effect on its performance against a hard steel target. Validation of the numerical model and used materials was first performed, using available experimental data. A short description and Computer-Aided Design (CAD) model of projectiles is also given. Comparing the M1158 projectile to other AP projectiles taken into consideration, it was concluded that the former had a much deeper penetration depth into a hard steel target (Armox 500T). The projectile’s penetrating capability is greatly impacted by the material selection used for its component parts. Assuming all other factors remain constant, penetrators with higher density and harderness can achieve deeper penetration. Under the same conditions, an increase in penetrator length results in an increase in penetration depth. The absence of a gilding metal jacket in the projectile’s frontal ogive section can decrease energy required to remove the jacket during the penetration, hence increasing the projectile’s penetration capabilities.","PeriodicalId":508000,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology","volume":"121 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15485129241240768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Six widely used 7.62 ×51 mm projectile types (M80, M61, P80/1, M80A1, M1158, and M993) were subjected to the analysis in this paper. Numerical simulations (Ansys Autodyn) of projectile impacts on hard steel targets were performed as part of this analysis. Projectiles had the same impact velocity (800 m/s). This allowed evaluation of the projectile’s design and material’s effect on its performance against a hard steel target. Validation of the numerical model and used materials was first performed, using available experimental data. A short description and Computer-Aided Design (CAD) model of projectiles is also given. Comparing the M1158 projectile to other AP projectiles taken into consideration, it was concluded that the former had a much deeper penetration depth into a hard steel target (Armox 500T). The projectile’s penetrating capability is greatly impacted by the material selection used for its component parts. Assuming all other factors remain constant, penetrators with higher density and harderness can achieve deeper penetration. Under the same conditions, an increase in penetrator length results in an increase in penetration depth. The absence of a gilding metal jacket in the projectile’s frontal ogive section can decrease energy required to remove the jacket during the penetration, hence increasing the projectile’s penetration capabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用数值模拟估算几种 7.62×51 毫米射弹的末端弹道参数
本文对六种广泛使用的 7.62 ×51 毫米弹丸(M80、M61、P80/1、M80A1、M1158 和 M993)进行了分析。作为分析的一部分,还对射弹撞击硬钢目标的情况进行了数值模拟(Ansys Autodyn)。弹丸的撞击速度相同(800 米/秒)。这样就可以评估弹丸的设计和材料对其撞击硬钢目标性能的影响。首先利用现有的实验数据对数值模型和所用材料进行了验证。此外,还简要介绍了弹丸和计算机辅助设计(CAD)模型。将 M1158 射弹与其他 AP 射弹进行比较后得出的结论是,前者对硬质钢靶(Armox 500T)的穿透深度更大。弹丸的穿透能力在很大程度上受到其部件材料选择的影响。假设所有其他因素保持不变,密度和硬度较高的穿甲弹可以达到更深的穿透深度。在相同条件下,穿甲弹长度的增加会导致穿透深度的增加。如果穿甲弹正面椭圆形部分没有镀金金属护套,则可减少穿透过程中去除护套所需的能量,从而提高穿甲弹的穿透能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A quantitative comparison of two different models of minefield transit Cutting edge technologies for future military applications: trends and challenges Developing an IoT-enabled probabilistic model for quick identification of hidden radioactive materials in maritime port operations to strengthen global supply chain security Statement of requirements on the accuracy of rocket CFD analysis using exterior ballistics for example rocket models Enhancing military medical evacuation dispatching with armed escort management: comparing model-based reinforcement learning approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1