The Development of Instructional Model Based on Design Thinking and Brainstorming to Enhance Undergraduate Students’ Creative Thinking Ability

Chaozheng Zhou, Bung-on Sereerat, Saifon Songsiengchai, Phenporn Thongkamsuk
{"title":"The Development of Instructional Model Based on Design Thinking and Brainstorming to Enhance Undergraduate Students’ Creative Thinking Ability","authors":"Chaozheng Zhou, Bung-on Sereerat, Saifon Songsiengchai, Phenporn Thongkamsuk","doi":"10.5430/wje.v14n1p12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to 1) study the factors that affect third-year undergraduate students’ creative thinking ability at Baise University, 2) develop an instructional model based on design thinking and brainstorming, 3) compare third-year undergraduate students’ creative thinking ability before and after using the instructional model based on design thinking and brainstorming. The sample group was 45 third-year undergraduate students at Baise University. The research Instruments were 1) an interview form about factors that affect the development of third-year undergraduate students’ creative thinking ability, 2) a questionnaire about factors that affect the development of third-year undergraduate students’ creative thinking ability, 3) lesson plans, 4) a creative thinking ability test 5) an interview form about opinions on teaching 6) an observation form about students’ behavior. This study analyzed quantitative data through descriptive statistics, frequency, percentage, means, and standard deviation. For dependent samples, t-tests were used to analyze the different scores of undergraduate students before and after using the instructional model. Qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis. The research results were 1) the factors affecting undergraduate students’ creative thinking ability include environmental factors (family, school, and society) and personal factors (personality traits, motivation, attitude, and emotional state), 2) the four components of the instructional model are principle, objective, learning process, and result, 3) after implementing the instructional model, the post-test scores of undergraduate students' creative thinking ability significantly increased, with a statistical significance of 0.01.","PeriodicalId":515214,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Education","volume":"117 43","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v14n1p12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aimed to 1) study the factors that affect third-year undergraduate students’ creative thinking ability at Baise University, 2) develop an instructional model based on design thinking and brainstorming, 3) compare third-year undergraduate students’ creative thinking ability before and after using the instructional model based on design thinking and brainstorming. The sample group was 45 third-year undergraduate students at Baise University. The research Instruments were 1) an interview form about factors that affect the development of third-year undergraduate students’ creative thinking ability, 2) a questionnaire about factors that affect the development of third-year undergraduate students’ creative thinking ability, 3) lesson plans, 4) a creative thinking ability test 5) an interview form about opinions on teaching 6) an observation form about students’ behavior. This study analyzed quantitative data through descriptive statistics, frequency, percentage, means, and standard deviation. For dependent samples, t-tests were used to analyze the different scores of undergraduate students before and after using the instructional model. Qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis. The research results were 1) the factors affecting undergraduate students’ creative thinking ability include environmental factors (family, school, and society) and personal factors (personality traits, motivation, attitude, and emotional state), 2) the four components of the instructional model are principle, objective, learning process, and result, 3) after implementing the instructional model, the post-test scores of undergraduate students' creative thinking ability significantly increased, with a statistical significance of 0.01.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于设计思维和头脑风暴的教学模式的开发,以提高本科生的创新思维能力
本研究旨在:1)研究影响百色学院三年级本科生创造性思维能力的因素;2)开发基于设计思维和头脑风暴的教学模式;3)比较使用基于设计思维和头脑风暴的教学模式前后三年级本科生的创造性思维能力。样本组为百色学院 45 名三年级本科生。研究工具包括:1)影响三年级本科生创造性思维能力发展的因素访谈表;2)影响三年级本科生创造性思维能力发展的因素问卷;3)教案;4)创造性思维能力测试;5)教学意见访谈表;6)学生行为观察表。本研究通过描述性统计、频数、百分比、均值和标准差对定量数据进行分析。对于因果样本,采用 t 检验分析本科生在使用教学模式前后的不同得分。定性数据通过内容分析进行分析。研究结果为:1)影响本科生创造性思维能力的因素包括环境因素(家庭、学校和社会)和个人因素(个性特征、动机、态度和情绪状态);2)教学模式的四个组成部分是原则、目标、学习过程和结果;3)实施教学模式后,本科生创造性思维能力的后测得分显著提高,统计显著性为 0.01。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development Approach for Quality Assurance in Higher Education on Area-Based and Community based on the Concept of Management of Educational Institution as the World of New Learning to Promote Students’ Living Valuable Lives Embracing the Promise of Open Educational Resources: Faculty Insights and Implications in Higher Education Development for Teacher’s 21st-Century Skills Enhancement into Effective Practices The Development of Instructional Model Based on Design Thinking and Brainstorming to Enhance Undergraduate Students’ Creative Thinking Ability Teaching Mathematics to Students with Hearing Loss Using Instructional Materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1