Evaluation of the Leisure Boredom Perception of Coaches from Different Sports Branches

Şebnem ŞARVAN CENGİZ, Ebrar Şevval Coşkun, Batuhan Er
{"title":"Evaluation of the Leisure Boredom Perception of Coaches from Different Sports Branches","authors":"Şebnem ŞARVAN CENGİZ, Ebrar Şevval Coşkun, Batuhan Er","doi":"10.46463/ijrss.1377959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to evaluate the perceptions of leisure boredom of coaches working in different sports branches. The sample group of the study consists of 224 coaches, 173 men, and 51 women, actively working in different sports branches. In the study, in order to determine individuals' perceptions of leisure boredom, a method developed by Weissinger and Iso-Ahola, \"Leisure Boredom Scale (LBS),\" which was adapted to Turkish culture by Kara et al. (2014), was applied. When the internal consistency coefficients of the Leisure Boredom Scale were examined, it was determined that α = .721 for the boredom sub-dimension and α = 721 for the satisfaction sub-dimension. In order to compare the boredom perceptions of the participant group in terms of different variables, t-Test for Independent Samples and One-way ANOVA were applied. As a result of the analyses, no difference was detected in the coaches' perception of leisure boredom in terms of gender variable (p>.05). No significant difference was detected as a result of the single-factor analysis of variance performed, according to the coaching branch variable of the participant group (p>.05). However, when the results of the single-factor analysis of variance for the coaching experience variable were examined, it was seen that there was a significant difference in the \"boredom\" and \"satisfaction\" sub-dimensions according to the experience of the coaches (p","PeriodicalId":163744,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Recreation and Sports Science","volume":" 56","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Recreation and Sports Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46463/ijrss.1377959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the perceptions of leisure boredom of coaches working in different sports branches. The sample group of the study consists of 224 coaches, 173 men, and 51 women, actively working in different sports branches. In the study, in order to determine individuals' perceptions of leisure boredom, a method developed by Weissinger and Iso-Ahola, "Leisure Boredom Scale (LBS)," which was adapted to Turkish culture by Kara et al. (2014), was applied. When the internal consistency coefficients of the Leisure Boredom Scale were examined, it was determined that α = .721 for the boredom sub-dimension and α = 721 for the satisfaction sub-dimension. In order to compare the boredom perceptions of the participant group in terms of different variables, t-Test for Independent Samples and One-way ANOVA were applied. As a result of the analyses, no difference was detected in the coaches' perception of leisure boredom in terms of gender variable (p>.05). No significant difference was detected as a result of the single-factor analysis of variance performed, according to the coaching branch variable of the participant group (p>.05). However, when the results of the single-factor analysis of variance for the coaching experience variable were examined, it was seen that there was a significant difference in the "boredom" and "satisfaction" sub-dimensions according to the experience of the coaches (p
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对不同体育项目教练员休闲枯燥感的评估
本研究旨在评估在不同体育部门工作的教练员对休闲无聊的看法。研究的样本组包括 224 名活跃在不同体育领域的教练员,其中男性 173 名,女性 51 名。在研究中,为了确定个人对闲暇无聊的感知,采用了由 Weissinger 和 Iso-Ahola 开发的 "闲暇无聊量表(LBS)",该量表由 Kara 等人(2014 年)根据土耳其文化进行了调整。在对休闲无聊感量表的内部一致性系数进行检验时,确定无聊感子维度的内部一致性系数为α = .721,满意度子维度的内部一致性系数为α = 721。为了从不同变量的角度对参与者组的无聊感进行比较,采用了独立样本 t 检验和单因素方差分析。分析结果表明,在性别变量方面,教练员对休闲无聊感的认识没有差异(P>.05)。根据学员组的教练分支变量进行的单因素方差分析结果也未发现明显差异(P>.05)。然而,在对教练经验变量进行单因素方差分析的结果进行研究时,发现根据教练经验的不同,"无聊感 "和 "满意度 "两个子维度存在显著差异(p<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Leisure Boredom Perception of Coaches from Different Sports Branches The Effect Of Preschool Chıldren's Partıcıpatıon In Sportıve Recreatıonal Actıvıtıes On Balance And Flexıbılıty Performance Examining the Relationship between Body Image and Psychological Recilience in Individuals who Do Fitness as Recreational Activity Examination of Career Awareness of University Students Studying in the Field of Sport Sciences Investigation of Freestyle Performance in Swimmers with Different Equipments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1