Problems of differentiation in the codes of labor laws of the RSFSR and the Labor Code of the Russian Federation

A. B. Ivanov
{"title":"Problems of differentiation in the codes of labor laws of the RSFSR and the Labor Code of the Russian Federation","authors":"A. B. Ivanov","doi":"10.18255/1996-5648-2024-1-70-77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article addresses the problem of codification of special labor law norms, justifies the importance of their consolidation in the sectoral code. The domestic historical experience of codification through the prism of differentiation is investigated. Trends in the differentiation of legal regulation of labor relations in the modern period are analyzed. The shortcomings of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation in terms of labor regulation of certain categories of employees are shown, options for solving this problem are considered. The need for differentiation in a codified act of labor law is due to the nature of labor in certain areas, as well as the special concern of the state for certain groups of employees. The Code is the main sectoral act, it must contain special norms in order to meet the requirements of completeness and consistency. In the four Russian labor codes, the issue of differentiation was resolved in different ways. With each new codification, the legislator, relying on the experience gained, approached this issue more consistently, while there was also a «field» for criticism. The task of optimal construction of special labor and legal norms is also relevant for the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, in modern conditions the relevance increases due to the increase in atypical employment. It is important, retaining in the codified act a special chapter on the features of labor, to establish uniform approaches to its regulation in relation to the main professional groups and spheres. At the same time, it is inappropriate to reflect in the code the features of labor affecting the specialization of a particular profession, turning the act of codification into a collection of instructions. The legislator should also consider the issue of consolidation in art. 2 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, devoted to the principles of legal regulation of labor relations, the principle of differentiation.","PeriodicalId":396792,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P. G. Demidova. Seriya gumanitarnye nauki","volume":" 37","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P. G. Demidova. Seriya gumanitarnye nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18255/1996-5648-2024-1-70-77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article addresses the problem of codification of special labor law norms, justifies the importance of their consolidation in the sectoral code. The domestic historical experience of codification through the prism of differentiation is investigated. Trends in the differentiation of legal regulation of labor relations in the modern period are analyzed. The shortcomings of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation in terms of labor regulation of certain categories of employees are shown, options for solving this problem are considered. The need for differentiation in a codified act of labor law is due to the nature of labor in certain areas, as well as the special concern of the state for certain groups of employees. The Code is the main sectoral act, it must contain special norms in order to meet the requirements of completeness and consistency. In the four Russian labor codes, the issue of differentiation was resolved in different ways. With each new codification, the legislator, relying on the experience gained, approached this issue more consistently, while there was also a «field» for criticism. The task of optimal construction of special labor and legal norms is also relevant for the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, in modern conditions the relevance increases due to the increase in atypical employment. It is important, retaining in the codified act a special chapter on the features of labor, to establish uniform approaches to its regulation in relation to the main professional groups and spheres. At the same time, it is inappropriate to reflect in the code the features of labor affecting the specialization of a particular profession, turning the act of codification into a collection of instructions. The legislator should also consider the issue of consolidation in art. 2 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, devoted to the principles of legal regulation of labor relations, the principle of differentiation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯苏维埃联邦社会主义共和国劳动法典》和《俄罗斯联邦劳动法典》的区别问题
文章探讨了特别劳动法规范的编纂问题,论证了将其纳入部门法典的重要性。文章从差异化的角度研究了国内法典编纂的历史经验。文章分析了现代劳动关系法律规范的分化趋势。说明了《俄罗斯联邦劳动法典》在某些类别雇员的劳动调节方面存在的缺陷,并考虑了解决这一问题的方案。由于某些领域的劳动性质,以及国家对某些雇员群体的特殊关注,需要在劳动法法典中进行 区别对待。法典是主要的部门法,必须包含特殊规范以满足完整性和一致性的要求。俄罗斯的四部劳动法典以不同的方式解决了区别对待的问题。每一部新法典的编纂,立法者都会借鉴已有的经验,以更加一致的方式处理这一问题,但同时也存在着可以批评的 "领域"。在现代条件下,由于非典型就业的增加,《俄罗斯联邦劳动法典》的相关性也随之增加。重要的是,在成文法中保留关于劳动特征的专门章节,以确定与主要职业群体和领域相关的统一规范 方法。同时,在法典中反映影响特定职业专业化的劳动特征是不恰当的,这样会使法典化法案成为指令集。立法者还应考虑《俄罗斯劳动法典》第 2 条中的合并问题。俄罗斯联邦劳动法典》第 2 条专门规定了劳动关系的法律调节原则和区分原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Falsification of registration of organizations and registration of rights to securities in domestic criminal law Problems of differentiation in the codes of labor laws of the RSFSR and the Labor Code of the Russian Federation Mean values in historical studies Meaningful manifestations of types of sensitivity to humans among students of psychological and pedagogical areas of training Reflection of Everyday Life of the Common Man on the Pages of the "Satyricon" Magazine. Part 2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1