Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Farm Household Resilience to Natural Hazards

A. W. Utami, N. P. A. Widjanarko, D. Indradewa, A. Dhamira, Mutiarra Ridyo Arum, Fathi Alfinur Rizqi, N. A. Komarudin, Din Prabaningtyas
{"title":"Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Farm Household Resilience to Natural Hazards","authors":"A. W. Utami, N. P. A. Widjanarko, D. Indradewa, A. Dhamira, Mutiarra Ridyo Arum, Fathi Alfinur Rizqi, N. A. Komarudin, Din Prabaningtyas","doi":"10.20961/carakatani.v39i1.79774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study portrays the roles of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) in the mitigation of natural hazards. Menoreh Hill in Kulon Progo experienced more than 200 landslides in 2022 and its communities implemented TEK to mitigate them. Hence, this research quantitatively analyzes the role of agriculture-related TEK, especially those applied in hilly areas, to support household resilience to natural hazards. Authors surveyed 106 farm households and interviewed eight key informants in Banjararum and Sidoharjo Villages, Kalibawang and Samigaluh Sub-districts, Kulon Progo Regency, D.I. Yogyakarta. The data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. The descriptive statistics showed that farmers in both villages are highest in practicing alley cropping and integrated farming, while also applying mixed cropping, multiple cropping and locally based planting schedule (pranata mangsa). From binary logistic regression, authors found that TEK practices of multiple cropping, alley cropping and pranata mangsa support farm household resilience to natural hazards, especially landslides. The TEK practices serve as sources of buffer and adaptation capacity in the development of farm household resilience. Interestingly, mixed cropping and membership in farmer groups tend to weaken resilience, as mixed cropping often complicates the recovery efforts in the farmlands, and farmers’ groups are not conditioned to act promptly during hazards or disasters. While TEK has been proven to take roles in the mitigation and adaptation to natural hazards, there is a need to integrate scientific knowledge to improve its optimum benefits.","PeriodicalId":513248,"journal":{"name":"Caraka Tani: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture","volume":"30 41","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caraka Tani: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/carakatani.v39i1.79774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study portrays the roles of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) in the mitigation of natural hazards. Menoreh Hill in Kulon Progo experienced more than 200 landslides in 2022 and its communities implemented TEK to mitigate them. Hence, this research quantitatively analyzes the role of agriculture-related TEK, especially those applied in hilly areas, to support household resilience to natural hazards. Authors surveyed 106 farm households and interviewed eight key informants in Banjararum and Sidoharjo Villages, Kalibawang and Samigaluh Sub-districts, Kulon Progo Regency, D.I. Yogyakarta. The data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. The descriptive statistics showed that farmers in both villages are highest in practicing alley cropping and integrated farming, while also applying mixed cropping, multiple cropping and locally based planting schedule (pranata mangsa). From binary logistic regression, authors found that TEK practices of multiple cropping, alley cropping and pranata mangsa support farm household resilience to natural hazards, especially landslides. The TEK practices serve as sources of buffer and adaptation capacity in the development of farm household resilience. Interestingly, mixed cropping and membership in farmer groups tend to weaken resilience, as mixed cropping often complicates the recovery efforts in the farmlands, and farmers’ groups are not conditioned to act promptly during hazards or disasters. While TEK has been proven to take roles in the mitigation and adaptation to natural hazards, there is a need to integrate scientific knowledge to improve its optimum benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统生态知识与农户抵御自然灾害的能力
本研究描绘了传统生态知识(TEK)在减轻自然灾害中的作用。2022 年,Kulon Progo 的 Menoreh 山经历了 200 多次山体滑坡,当地社区利用传统生态知识(TEK)缓解了山体滑坡。因此,本研究定量分析了与农业相关的传统知识(尤其是应用于丘陵地区的传统知识)在支持家庭抵御自然灾害方面的作用。作者在日惹省 Kulon Progo 县的 Banjararum 村和 Sidoharjo 村、Kalibawang 县和 Samigaluh 县调查了 106 户农户,并采访了 8 位主要信息提供者。然后使用描述性统计和二元逻辑回归对数据进行分析。描述性统计结果显示,这两个村庄的农民都最多采用巷作和综合耕作,同时还采用混合种植、多种种植和基于本地的种植计划(pranata mangsa)。通过二元逻辑回归,作者发现,多茬种植、小巷耕作和pranata mangsa等技术经济知识实践有助于农户抵御自然灾害,尤其是山体滑坡。在发展农户抗灾能力的过程中,这些技术、经济和知识实践是缓冲和适应能力的来源。有趣的是,混合种植和农民团体的成员资格往往会削弱抗灾能力,因为混合种植往往会使农田恢复工作复杂化,而且农民团体没有在危害或灾害发生时迅速采取行动的条件。虽然技术和经济知识已被证明可在减轻和适应自然灾害方面发挥作用,但仍有必要整合科学知识,以提高其最佳效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity of Knowledge-Sharing Behavior to Encourage the Practice of Robusta Coffee Red-Picking (Case Study of Temanggung Robusta Coffee Farmer, Indonesia) Status and Development of Agricultural Public-Private Partnership Program Implementation in China Identification and Reduction of Bitter Taste Determinant Compounds in Chocolate Spread Formulated with Candlenut Analysis of the Emerging Market for Poultry By-Products in Ghana Phytohormone-Based Biostimulants as an Alternative Mitigating Strategy for Horticultural Plants Grown Under Adverse Multi-Stress Conditions: Common South African Stress Factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1