Doris Kumadoh , Hilda Amekyeh , Mary-Ann Archer , Michael O. Kyene , Genevieve N. Yeboah , Henry Brew-Daniels , Ofosua Adi-Dako , Christina Osei-Asare , Emmanuel Adase , Alfred A. Appiah
{"title":"Determination of consistency in pH of some commercial herbal formulations in Ghana","authors":"Doris Kumadoh , Hilda Amekyeh , Mary-Ann Archer , Michael O. Kyene , Genevieve N. Yeboah , Henry Brew-Daniels , Ofosua Adi-Dako , Christina Osei-Asare , Emmanuel Adase , Alfred A. Appiah","doi":"10.1016/j.hermed.2024.100876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There are no strict pH standards for herbal formulations; however, pH can affect the characteristics of drugs and herbal formulations. In this study, the pHs of different herbal formulations produced in the past two batch years at the Centre for Plant Medicine Research (Mampong-Akuapem, Ghana) were analysed. We aimed to evaluate pH consistency among the formulations and suggest suitable pH ranges for the different product classes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The formulations analysed were 17 decoctions, three ointments, and nine powders. Suitable ointment and powder samples were prepared before pH was measured, whereas decoctions were analysed directly.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found that 93.1% of the preparations had average pH < 7 over the two years. The pH values for the decoctions, ointments, and powders were 3.507−6.755, 5.153−5.700, and 5.413−10.719, respectively. Differences in pH over the two production years were not statistically significant for all the powder and ointment formulations as well as for majority of the decoctions (82.4%). This indicates pH consistency for approximately 90% of the products, possibly pointing to consistencies in plant material compositions, formulation conditions, and process parameters.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>From our data and reported literature, we recommend that the labels of oral herbal preparations with pH < 5.5 should include an instruction to dilute the product before intake, or to drink water or rinse the mouth after intake to prevent enamel erosion. Decoctions may also be taken after food. Additionally, pH ranges of 4.6−7.0 and 4.0−6.0 may be suitable for rectal and topical herbal formulations, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Herbal Medicine","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100876"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Herbal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210803324000332","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
There are no strict pH standards for herbal formulations; however, pH can affect the characteristics of drugs and herbal formulations. In this study, the pHs of different herbal formulations produced in the past two batch years at the Centre for Plant Medicine Research (Mampong-Akuapem, Ghana) were analysed. We aimed to evaluate pH consistency among the formulations and suggest suitable pH ranges for the different product classes.
Methods
The formulations analysed were 17 decoctions, three ointments, and nine powders. Suitable ointment and powder samples were prepared before pH was measured, whereas decoctions were analysed directly.
Results
We found that 93.1% of the preparations had average pH < 7 over the two years. The pH values for the decoctions, ointments, and powders were 3.507−6.755, 5.153−5.700, and 5.413−10.719, respectively. Differences in pH over the two production years were not statistically significant for all the powder and ointment formulations as well as for majority of the decoctions (82.4%). This indicates pH consistency for approximately 90% of the products, possibly pointing to consistencies in plant material compositions, formulation conditions, and process parameters.
Conclusions
From our data and reported literature, we recommend that the labels of oral herbal preparations with pH < 5.5 should include an instruction to dilute the product before intake, or to drink water or rinse the mouth after intake to prevent enamel erosion. Decoctions may also be taken after food. Additionally, pH ranges of 4.6−7.0 and 4.0−6.0 may be suitable for rectal and topical herbal formulations, respectively.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Herbal Medicine, the official journal of the National Institute of Medical Herbalists, is a peer reviewed journal which aims to serve its readers as an authoritative resource on the profession and practice of herbal medicine. The content areas of the journal reflect the interests of Medical Herbalists and other health professionals interested in the clinical and professional application of botanical medicines. The objective is to strengthen the research and educational base of herbal medicine with research papers in the form of case studies, original research articles and reviews, monographs, clinical trials and relevant in vitro studies. It also publishes policy statements, opinion pieces, book reviews, conference proceedings and profession related information such as pharmacovigilance reports providing an information source for not only the Herbal Practitioner but any Health professional with an interest in phytotherapy.