Diagnostic Value of Dermoscopic Structures in Predicting Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma in the Skin of Color

Maryam Khalili, Sare Mirahmadi, Simin Shamsimeymandi, S. Dabiri, Rezvan Amiri, M. R. Z. Rukerd, Mahin Aflatoonian
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of Dermoscopic Structures in Predicting Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma in the Skin of Color","authors":"Maryam Khalili, Sare Mirahmadi, Simin Shamsimeymandi, S. Dabiri, Rezvan Amiri, M. R. Z. Rukerd, Mahin Aflatoonian","doi":"10.4103/abr.abr_315_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) manifests different dermoscopic patterns in individuals with dark skin complexion compared to those with fair skin types. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic utility of dermoscopy in discerning superficial BCC from other types of BCC, specifically in patients with dark skin complexion.\n \n \n \n This cross-sectional study focuses on patients diagnosed with BCC who were referred for skin biopsy between July 2020 and September 2022. Initially, the demographic characteristics of patients, clinical attributes of lesions, and pathological sub-types of BCC were documented. Subsequently, videodermoscopy was employed to capture comprehensive views and dermoscopic images of the lesions. Univariate logistic regression analysis was then utilized to assess the reliability of dermoscopic structures in distinguishing superficial BCC from other BCC types. Last, the study evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of dermoscopy in the differentiation of superficial BCC from other BCC sub-types.\n \n \n \n The study enrolled 49 patients diagnosed with BCC, with a mean age of 66.22 ± 10.41 years. The most prevalent pathological sub-type observed was nodular (53.1%). Dermoscopy exhibited a higher specificity compared to the naked eye in the differentiation of superficial BCC from other types (55% vs. 35%, respectively). Univariate analysis revealed a significant association between spoke-wheel structures and superficial BCC (P = 0.02, odds ratio = 7.2, 95% confidence interval = 1.35–38.32).\n \n \n \n Dermoscopy exhibited superior specificity compared to the naked eye in differentiating superficial BCC from other BCC types. Notably, the spoke-wheel structure demonstrated the most robust correlation with superficial BCC.\n","PeriodicalId":7225,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Biomedical Research","volume":"35 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_315_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) manifests different dermoscopic patterns in individuals with dark skin complexion compared to those with fair skin types. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic utility of dermoscopy in discerning superficial BCC from other types of BCC, specifically in patients with dark skin complexion. This cross-sectional study focuses on patients diagnosed with BCC who were referred for skin biopsy between July 2020 and September 2022. Initially, the demographic characteristics of patients, clinical attributes of lesions, and pathological sub-types of BCC were documented. Subsequently, videodermoscopy was employed to capture comprehensive views and dermoscopic images of the lesions. Univariate logistic regression analysis was then utilized to assess the reliability of dermoscopic structures in distinguishing superficial BCC from other BCC types. Last, the study evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of dermoscopy in the differentiation of superficial BCC from other BCC sub-types. The study enrolled 49 patients diagnosed with BCC, with a mean age of 66.22 ± 10.41 years. The most prevalent pathological sub-type observed was nodular (53.1%). Dermoscopy exhibited a higher specificity compared to the naked eye in the differentiation of superficial BCC from other types (55% vs. 35%, respectively). Univariate analysis revealed a significant association between spoke-wheel structures and superficial BCC (P = 0.02, odds ratio = 7.2, 95% confidence interval = 1.35–38.32). Dermoscopy exhibited superior specificity compared to the naked eye in differentiating superficial BCC from other BCC types. Notably, the spoke-wheel structure demonstrated the most robust correlation with superficial BCC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮肤镜结构在预测有色人种皮肤表层基底细胞癌方面的诊断价值
与肤色白皙的人相比,肤色黝黑的人患上基底细胞癌(BCC)时,皮肤镜显示的形态会有所不同。本研究旨在探讨皮肤镜在鉴别浅表BCC和其他类型BCC方面的诊断作用,尤其是在肤色较深的患者中。 这项横断面研究的重点是2020年7月至2022年9月期间被转诊进行皮肤活检的BCC患者。研究首先记录了患者的人口统计学特征、皮损的临床属性以及 BCC 的病理亚型。随后,采用视频皮肤镜拍摄病变的全面视图和皮肤镜图像。然后利用单变量逻辑回归分析评估了皮肤镜结构在区分表层 BCC 和其他 BCC 类型方面的可靠性。最后,研究评估了皮肤镜在区分表浅 BCC 和其他 BCC 亚型时的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。 该研究共纳入 49 名确诊为 BCC 的患者,平均年龄为(66.22 ± 10.41)岁。最常见的病理亚型是结节型(53.1%)。与肉眼相比,皮肤镜在区分浅表 BCC 和其他类型方面具有更高的特异性(分别为 55% 和 35%)。单变量分析显示,辐轮结构与浅表 BCC 有显著关联(P = 0.02,几率比 = 7.2,95% 置信区间 = 1.35-38.32)。 与肉眼相比,皮肤镜在区分表浅 BCC 和其他 BCC 类型方面具有更高的特异性。值得注意的是,辐轮结构与表浅 BCC 的相关性最强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cytotoxic Sulfoquinovosyl Glycerols from the Seaweed Sargassum Angustifolium from Persian Gulf Effect of Silybum Marianum on Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity with Cisplatin Evaluation of IP3R3 Gene Silencing Effect on Pyruvate Dehydrogenase (PDH) Enzyme Activity in Breast Cancer Cells with and Without Estrogen Receptor Diagnostic Value of Dermoscopic Structures in Predicting Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma in the Skin of Color The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1