Comparison Study of Corn Leaf Disease Detection based on Deep Learning YOLO-v5 and YOLO-v8

IF 0.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2024.56.1.5
Nidya Chitraningrum, L. Banowati, Dina Herdiana, Budi Mulyati, Indra Sakti, Ahmad Fudholi, Huzair Saputra, Salman Farishi, Kahlil Muchtar, Agus Andria
{"title":"Comparison Study of Corn Leaf Disease Detection based on Deep Learning YOLO-v5 and YOLO-v8","authors":"Nidya Chitraningrum, L. Banowati, Dina Herdiana, Budi Mulyati, Indra Sakti, Ahmad Fudholi, Huzair Saputra, Salman Farishi, Kahlil Muchtar, Agus Andria","doi":"10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2024.56.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corn is one of the primary carbohydrate-rich food commodities in Southeast Asian countries, among which Indonesia. Corn production is highly dependent on the health of the corn plant. Infected plants will decrease corn plant productivity. Usually, corn farmers use conventional methods to control diseases in corn plants. Still, these methods are not effective and efficient because they require a long time and a lot of human labor. Deep learning-based plant disease detection has recently been used for early disease detection in agriculture. In this work, we used convolutional neural network algorithms, namely YOLO-v5 and YOLO-v8, to detect infected corn leaves in the public data set called ‘Corn Leaf Infection Data set’ from the Kaggle repository. We compared the mean average precision (mAP) of mAP 50 and mAP 50-95 between YOLO-v5 and YOLO-v8. YOLO-v8 showed better accuracy at an mAP 50 of 0.965 and an mAP 50-95 of 0.727. YOLO-v8 also showed a higher detection number of 12 detections than YOLO-v5 at 11 detections. Both YOLO algorithms required about 2.49 to 3.75 hours to detect the infected corn leaves. This all-trained model could be an effective solution for early disease detection in future corn plantations.","PeriodicalId":15689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2024.56.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corn is one of the primary carbohydrate-rich food commodities in Southeast Asian countries, among which Indonesia. Corn production is highly dependent on the health of the corn plant. Infected plants will decrease corn plant productivity. Usually, corn farmers use conventional methods to control diseases in corn plants. Still, these methods are not effective and efficient because they require a long time and a lot of human labor. Deep learning-based plant disease detection has recently been used for early disease detection in agriculture. In this work, we used convolutional neural network algorithms, namely YOLO-v5 and YOLO-v8, to detect infected corn leaves in the public data set called ‘Corn Leaf Infection Data set’ from the Kaggle repository. We compared the mean average precision (mAP) of mAP 50 and mAP 50-95 between YOLO-v5 and YOLO-v8. YOLO-v8 showed better accuracy at an mAP 50 of 0.965 and an mAP 50-95 of 0.727. YOLO-v8 also showed a higher detection number of 12 detections than YOLO-v5 at 11 detections. Both YOLO algorithms required about 2.49 to 3.75 hours to detect the infected corn leaves. This all-trained model could be an effective solution for early disease detection in future corn plantations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于深度学习 YOLO-v5 和 YOLO-v8 的玉米叶病检测对比研究
玉米是东南亚国家(其中包括印度尼西亚)富含碳水化合物的主要食品之一。玉米产量在很大程度上取决于玉米植株的健康状况。受感染的植株会降低玉米植株的产量。玉米种植者通常使用传统方法来控制玉米植株的病害。然而,这些方法并不有效,因为它们需要花费很长的时间和大量的人力。基于深度学习的植物病害检测最近被用于农业早期病害检测。在这项工作中,我们使用卷积神经网络算法,即 YOLO-v5 和 YOLO-v8,检测了 Kaggle 存储库中名为 "玉米叶片感染数据集 "的公共数据集中受感染的玉米叶片。我们比较了 YOLO-v5 和 YOLO-v8 的 mAP 50 和 mAP 50-95 的平均精度(mAP)。YOLO-v8 显示出更高的精确度,mAP 50 为 0.965,mAP 50-95 为 0.727。YOLO-v8 的检测次数为 12 次,高于 YOLO-v5 的 11 次。两种 YOLO 算法都需要约 2.49 到 3.75 个小时来检测受感染的玉米叶片。这种全训练模型可以成为未来玉米种植园早期病害检测的有效解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences
Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
77
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences welcomes full research articles in the area of Engineering Sciences from the following subject areas: Aerospace Engineering, Biotechnology, Chemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Engineering Physics, Environmental Engineering, Industrial Engineering, Information Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Material Science and Engineering, Manufacturing Processes, Microelectronics, Mining Engineering, Petroleum Engineering, and other application of physical, biological, chemical and mathematical sciences in engineering. Authors are invited to submit articles that have not been published previously and are not under consideration elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Green Energy Technologies: A Key Driver in Carbon Emission Reduction The Effect of Illumination, Electrode Distance, and Illumination Periods on the Performance of Phototrophic Sediment Microbial Fuel Cells (PSMFCs) Comparison Study of Corn Leaf Disease Detection based on Deep Learning YOLO-v5 and YOLO-v8 Hematite-Gamma Alumina-based Solid Catalyst Development for Biodiesel Production from Palm Oil Minimize Total Cost and Maximize Total Profit for Power Systems with Pumped Storage Hydro and Renewable Power Plants Using Improved Self-Organizing Migration Algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1